Malak Mohamed MBChB MRes , Saliqa Amin , Edward Lever , Angelina Montini , Komari Machida , Srivatsan Rajagopalan MSc , Prof Anthony Costello FRCPCH , Alice McGushin MBBS , Beth Jennings PhD , Laelia Benoit MD , Naomi Saville PhD , Nicola Walshe PhD , Sarah L Dalglish PhD , Sonja Ayeb-Karlsson PhD , Sarah Sterlini BA , Prof Audrey Prost PhD
{"title":"Climate change and child wellbeing: a systematic evidence and gap map on impacts, mitigation, and adaptation","authors":"Malak Mohamed MBChB MRes , Saliqa Amin , Edward Lever , Angelina Montini , Komari Machida , Srivatsan Rajagopalan MSc , Prof Anthony Costello FRCPCH , Alice McGushin MBBS , Beth Jennings PhD , Laelia Benoit MD , Naomi Saville PhD , Nicola Walshe PhD , Sarah L Dalglish PhD , Sonja Ayeb-Karlsson PhD , Sarah Sterlini BA , Prof Audrey Prost PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00061-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We developed a systematic evidence and gap map (2014–24) to assess how climate change impacts, mitigation, and adaptation affect the wellbeing of children aged 0–18 years globally, and discussed findings with the Children in All Policies 2030 Youth Advisory Board. Health was the most researched child wellbeing domain (84%; 948 of 1127 studies), followed by education (15%; n=171), and food security and nutrition (14%; n=160). Research on children's agency and resilience, displacement, socioeconomic distress, and safety received less attention. Health research gaps included limited studies on vector-borne diseases, children's mental health beyond post-traumatic stress disorder, and health outcomes for children aged 5–18 years. Mitigation and adaptation research focused largely on educational (45%; 114 of 252 studies) and behavioural changes (31%; n=79), with gaps in the evaluation of financing, infrastructure, technology, clean energy, and policy actions. Youth advisory board members emphasised the importance of schools, social media, and intergenerational dialogue in driving climate action while protecting children's wellbeing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages e337-e346"},"PeriodicalIF":24.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Planetary Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542519625000610","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We developed a systematic evidence and gap map (2014–24) to assess how climate change impacts, mitigation, and adaptation affect the wellbeing of children aged 0–18 years globally, and discussed findings with the Children in All Policies 2030 Youth Advisory Board. Health was the most researched child wellbeing domain (84%; 948 of 1127 studies), followed by education (15%; n=171), and food security and nutrition (14%; n=160). Research on children's agency and resilience, displacement, socioeconomic distress, and safety received less attention. Health research gaps included limited studies on vector-borne diseases, children's mental health beyond post-traumatic stress disorder, and health outcomes for children aged 5–18 years. Mitigation and adaptation research focused largely on educational (45%; 114 of 252 studies) and behavioural changes (31%; n=79), with gaps in the evaluation of financing, infrastructure, technology, clean energy, and policy actions. Youth advisory board members emphasised the importance of schools, social media, and intergenerational dialogue in driving climate action while protecting children's wellbeing.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Planetary Health is a gold Open Access journal dedicated to investigating and addressing the multifaceted determinants of healthy human civilizations and their impact on natural systems. Positioned as a key player in sustainable development, the journal covers a broad, interdisciplinary scope, encompassing areas such as poverty, nutrition, gender equity, water and sanitation, energy, economic growth, industrialization, inequality, urbanization, human consumption and production, climate change, ocean health, land use, peace, and justice.
With a commitment to publishing high-quality research, comment, and correspondence, it aims to be the leading journal for sustainable development in the face of unprecedented dangers and threats.