Language improves health and wellbeing in Indigenous communities: A scoping review

Louise Harding , Ryan DeCaire , Ursula Ellis , Karleen Delaurier-Lyle , Julia Schillo , Mark Turin
{"title":"Language improves health and wellbeing in Indigenous communities: A scoping review","authors":"Louise Harding ,&nbsp;Ryan DeCaire ,&nbsp;Ursula Ellis ,&nbsp;Karleen Delaurier-Lyle ,&nbsp;Julia Schillo ,&nbsp;Mark Turin","doi":"10.1016/j.laheal.2025.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Indigenous languages in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States are endangered due to colonial policies which promote English language dominance. While Indigenous communities know the importance of language for their wellbeing, this topic has only recently received attention in scholarship and public policy. This scoping review synthesizes and assesses existing literature on the links between the vitality of Indigenous languages and health or wellness in four English-speaking settler colonial countries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our interdisciplinary research team followed JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Key databases searched included MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Searches were restricted to English language literature. The last search was on February 8, 2021. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted to categorize and elucidate the nature of the links reported.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over 10,000 records were reviewed and 262 met the inclusion criteria – 70 % academic and 30 % gray literature. The largest number of studies focus on Canadian contexts (40.1 %). 78 % of the original research studies report only supportive links between Indigenous languages and health, while 98 % of the literature reviews report supportive links. The most significant aspects of health reported to be positively related to language are outcomes from health care, education and promotion initiatives; overall health, wellness, resilience and healing; and mental, cognitive, and psychological health and development. The results of the remaining original research studies are mixed (10 %), statistically non-significant (6 %), adverse (5 %) and neutral (1 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of this scoping review suggest that a vast body of academic and gray literature exists to support that language is a determinant of health for Indigenous peoples in the contexts studied. Recommendations for harnessing the healing effects of language include increasing tangible support to language programs, delivering linguistically tailored health care, and advancing knowledge through community-engaged research and education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100865,"journal":{"name":"Language and Health","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949903825000028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Indigenous languages in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States are endangered due to colonial policies which promote English language dominance. While Indigenous communities know the importance of language for their wellbeing, this topic has only recently received attention in scholarship and public policy. This scoping review synthesizes and assesses existing literature on the links between the vitality of Indigenous languages and health or wellness in four English-speaking settler colonial countries.

Methods

Our interdisciplinary research team followed JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Key databases searched included MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Searches were restricted to English language literature. The last search was on February 8, 2021. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted to categorize and elucidate the nature of the links reported.

Results

Over 10,000 records were reviewed and 262 met the inclusion criteria – 70 % academic and 30 % gray literature. The largest number of studies focus on Canadian contexts (40.1 %). 78 % of the original research studies report only supportive links between Indigenous languages and health, while 98 % of the literature reviews report supportive links. The most significant aspects of health reported to be positively related to language are outcomes from health care, education and promotion initiatives; overall health, wellness, resilience and healing; and mental, cognitive, and psychological health and development. The results of the remaining original research studies are mixed (10 %), statistically non-significant (6 %), adverse (5 %) and neutral (1 %).

Conclusions

The results of this scoping review suggest that a vast body of academic and gray literature exists to support that language is a determinant of health for Indigenous peoples in the contexts studied. Recommendations for harnessing the healing effects of language include increasing tangible support to language programs, delivering linguistically tailored health care, and advancing knowledge through community-engaged research and education.
语言改善土著社区的健康和福祉:范围审查
澳大利亚、加拿大、新西兰和美国的土著语言由于促进英语主导地位的殖民政策而濒临灭绝。虽然土著社区知道语言对他们福祉的重要性,但这个话题直到最近才受到学术界和公共政策的关注。这一范围审查综合和评估了关于四个英语殖民国家土著语言活力与健康或健康之间联系的现有文献。方法我们的跨学科研究团队采用JBI方法进行范围评估。检索的主要数据库包括MEDLINE、PsycInfo和护理及相关健康文献累积索引。搜索仅限于英语文学。最后一次搜索是在2021年2月8日。进行了定量和定性分析,以分类和阐明所报告的联系的性质。结果共纳入10000余篇文献,262篇符合纳入标准,其中学术文献70篇 %,灰色文献30篇 %。最多的研究集中在加拿大的背景下(40.1% %)。78% %的原始研究报告土著语言与健康之间仅存在支持性联系,而98% %的文献综述报告存在支持性联系。据报告,与语言呈正相关的最重要的健康方面是保健、教育和促进倡议的结果;整体健康、健康、复原力和康复;以及心理、认知和心理健康与发展。其余原始研究的结果是混合的(10 %),统计上不显著的(6 %),不利的(5 %)和中性的(1 %)。结论本综述的结果表明,大量的学术文献和灰色文献支持语言是所研究背景下土著人民健康的决定因素。关于利用语言的治疗效果的建议包括增加对语言项目的有形支持,提供适合语言的医疗保健,以及通过社区参与的研究和教育来推进知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信