Calculating the heart rate cutoff that avoids motion artifacts with and without beta-blockers during 64-row coronary artery CT angiography

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
T. Masuda , T. Nakaura , Y. Funama , T. Sato , K. Arao , J. Miyata , K. Sugimoto , A. Ono , S. Arao , K. Awai
{"title":"Calculating the heart rate cutoff that avoids motion artifacts with and without beta-blockers during 64-row coronary artery CT angiography","authors":"T. Masuda ,&nbsp;T. Nakaura ,&nbsp;Y. Funama ,&nbsp;T. Sato ,&nbsp;K. Arao ,&nbsp;J. Miyata ,&nbsp;K. Sugimoto ,&nbsp;A. Ono ,&nbsp;S. Arao ,&nbsp;K. Awai","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.102950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study evaluates the establishment of specific heart rate (HR) cutoff values for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images obtained with and without the use of beta-blockers in a 64-row scanner.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 399 patients, of whom 269 received beta-blockers and 130 did not. Patients with an HR exceeding 65 bpm were administered an additional dose of landiolol hydrochloride (CoreBeta; Ono, Osaka, Japan). HR was continuously monitored using a noninvasive cardiac output monitor (Aesculon mini; Ospyka Medical, Berlin, Germany). A total of 1197 randomized curved maximum intensity projection images were independently reviewed by observers for the presence or absence of motion artifacts in the CCTA images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and determine the optimal HR thresholds that maximized the sum of sensitivity and specificity for detecting motion artifacts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The optimal HR cutoff values were 76.6 bpm (AUC = 0.88, sensitivity = 83.0 %, specificity = 78.0 %) with beta-blockers, and 64.3 bpm (AUC = 0.91, sensitivity = 93.0 %, specificity = 86.0 %) without beta-blockers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study determined the optimal HR cut-off values for CCTA using a 64-row CT scanner, with and without beta-blockers, respectively. Future research should explore how evolving imaging technology and techniques influence optimal HR thresholds and image quality.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Patients whose HR exceed 64.3 bpm during a CCTA scan, should be administered beta-blockers to lower HR to the level (≤64.3) that optimises image quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 3","pages":"Article 102950"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742500094X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study evaluates the establishment of specific heart rate (HR) cutoff values for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images obtained with and without the use of beta-blockers in a 64-row scanner.

Methods

The study included 399 patients, of whom 269 received beta-blockers and 130 did not. Patients with an HR exceeding 65 bpm were administered an additional dose of landiolol hydrochloride (CoreBeta; Ono, Osaka, Japan). HR was continuously monitored using a noninvasive cardiac output monitor (Aesculon mini; Ospyka Medical, Berlin, Germany). A total of 1197 randomized curved maximum intensity projection images were independently reviewed by observers for the presence or absence of motion artifacts in the CCTA images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and determine the optimal HR thresholds that maximized the sum of sensitivity and specificity for detecting motion artifacts.

Results

The optimal HR cutoff values were 76.6 bpm (AUC = 0.88, sensitivity = 83.0 %, specificity = 78.0 %) with beta-blockers, and 64.3 bpm (AUC = 0.91, sensitivity = 93.0 %, specificity = 86.0 %) without beta-blockers.

Conclusion

This study determined the optimal HR cut-off values for CCTA using a 64-row CT scanner, with and without beta-blockers, respectively. Future research should explore how evolving imaging technology and techniques influence optimal HR thresholds and image quality.

Implications for practice

Patients whose HR exceed 64.3 bpm during a CCTA scan, should be administered beta-blockers to lower HR to the level (≤64.3) that optimises image quality.
在64排冠状动脉CT血管造影中,计算心率临界值以避免使用和不使用β受体阻滞剂时的运动伪影
本研究评估了在64排扫描仪上使用和不使用β受体阻阻剂获得的冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)图像的特定心率(HR)临界值的建立。方法本研究纳入399例患者,其中269例接受β受体阻滞剂治疗,130例未接受β受体阻滞剂治疗。心率比超过65bpm的患者额外服用盐酸兰地洛尔(CoreBeta;小野,大阪,日本)。使用无创心输出量监测仪(Aesculon mini;Ospyka Medical,柏林,德国)。共1197张随机曲线最大强度投影图像由观察者独立审查CCTA图像中是否存在运动伪影。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来计算曲线下面积(AUC),并确定检测运动伪影的灵敏度和特异性之和最大的最佳HR阈值。结果使用受体阻滞剂时最佳心率临界值为76.6 bpm (AUC = 0.88,敏感性= 83.0%,特异性= 78.0%),未使用受体阻滞剂时最佳心率临界值为64.3 bpm (AUC = 0.91,敏感性= 93.0%,特异性= 86.0%)。本研究分别确定了使用和不使用受体阻滞剂的64排CT扫描仪CCTA的最佳HR临界值。未来的研究应该探索不断发展的成像技术和技术如何影响最佳HR阈值和图像质量。在CCTA扫描中心率超过64.3 bpm的患者,应给予β受体阻滞剂以降低心率到优化图像质量的水平(≤64.3)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信