The College of Radiographers’ Education and Career Framework (fourth edition): Exploring the guideline implementation gap across England using Normalisation Process Theory

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
H.L. Spencer , K.E. Williamson , A. Robertson , M.N.K. Anudjo , C.R. Burton
{"title":"The College of Radiographers’ Education and Career Framework (fourth edition): Exploring the guideline implementation gap across England using Normalisation Process Theory","authors":"H.L. Spencer ,&nbsp;K.E. Williamson ,&nbsp;A. Robertson ,&nbsp;M.N.K. Anudjo ,&nbsp;C.R. Burton","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.102931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In 2022, the College of Radiographers (CoR) published the fourth edition of their Education and Career Framework (ECF). This essential document provides a professional blueprint for the radiography career trajectory with the overarching aim of improving patient outcomes. However, publication does not guarantee adoption. To access the full benefits of the ECF, its implementation requires a strategic approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To advance our understanding of the translational gap between policy and practice, this observational mixed-methods study employed Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) as a theoretical frame. Focusing on the diagnostic radiography profession in England, a national consultation survey was deployed, together with four consultation workshops. The quantitative survey data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Meanwhile, the framework approach was adapted for the qualitative analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The data collection took place between April–June 2023. In total, 142 survey responses were returned. Each workshop was comprised of 7–11 participants. The findings were deductively interpreted through the lens of NPT, from which five core themes emerged: making sense of complexity (coherence); bringing people together (cognitive participation); being strategic (collective action); evaluating complexity (reflexive monitoring); implementation in the ‘real world’ (barriers and enablers).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>By furthering our understanding of how the workforce has received and utilised the ECF, the gaps in its implementation were identified. This led to the development of recommendations to address the implementation gaps and enhance the ECF's adoption. The recommendations were study-derived, linked to responsible stakeholders, and grouped into four strategic priorities, aligned with the NPT domains.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>By enacting these evidence-based recommendations, we can enhance the ECF's translation from printed page to real-world outcomes, for the benefit of the profession, service delivery, and service users.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 3","pages":"Article 102931"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425000720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In 2022, the College of Radiographers (CoR) published the fourth edition of their Education and Career Framework (ECF). This essential document provides a professional blueprint for the radiography career trajectory with the overarching aim of improving patient outcomes. However, publication does not guarantee adoption. To access the full benefits of the ECF, its implementation requires a strategic approach.

Methods

To advance our understanding of the translational gap between policy and practice, this observational mixed-methods study employed Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) as a theoretical frame. Focusing on the diagnostic radiography profession in England, a national consultation survey was deployed, together with four consultation workshops. The quantitative survey data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Meanwhile, the framework approach was adapted for the qualitative analysis.

Results

The data collection took place between April–June 2023. In total, 142 survey responses were returned. Each workshop was comprised of 7–11 participants. The findings were deductively interpreted through the lens of NPT, from which five core themes emerged: making sense of complexity (coherence); bringing people together (cognitive participation); being strategic (collective action); evaluating complexity (reflexive monitoring); implementation in the ‘real world’ (barriers and enablers).

Conclusion

By furthering our understanding of how the workforce has received and utilised the ECF, the gaps in its implementation were identified. This led to the development of recommendations to address the implementation gaps and enhance the ECF's adoption. The recommendations were study-derived, linked to responsible stakeholders, and grouped into four strategic priorities, aligned with the NPT domains.

Implications for practice

By enacting these evidence-based recommendations, we can enhance the ECF's translation from printed page to real-world outcomes, for the benefit of the profession, service delivery, and service users.
放射技师教育和职业框架学院(第四版):利用规范化过程理论探索英格兰的指导实施差距
在2022年,放射技师学院(CoR)发布了他们的教育和职业框架(ECF)的第四版。这个重要的文件提供了一个专业的蓝图,放射学的职业轨迹与改善患者的总体目标结果。但是,发表并不能保证采用。为了充分利用ECF的好处,它的实施需要一种战略方法。方法为了促进我们对政策与实践之间转化差距的理解,本观察性混合方法研究采用正常化过程理论(NPT)作为理论框架。针对英格兰的放射诊断专业,开展了一项全国咨询调查,并举办了四次咨询讲习班。定量调查数据采用描述性统计和推理统计进行分析。同时,采用框架方法进行定性分析。结果数据采集时间为2023年4 - 6月。共收到142份调查回复。每个讲习班由7-11名参加者组成。通过《不扩散核武器条约》的视角对调查结果进行了演绎解释,从中出现了五个核心主题:理解复杂性(一致性);将人们聚集在一起(认知参与);战略性(集体行动);评估复杂性(自反性监控);在“现实世界”中的实现(障碍和促成因素)。通过进一步了解员工如何接受和利用ECF,我们确定了其实施中的差距。这导致了建议的制定,以解决实施差距和加强ECF的采用。这些建议是根据研究得出的,与负责任的利益攸关方联系在一起,并根据《不扩散核武器条约》的领域分为四个战略重点。对实践的影响通过制定这些基于证据的建议,我们可以加强ECF从印刷页面到实际结果的转化,从而使专业人员、服务提供和服务用户受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信