Sukhveer Singh Sandhu , Dawn L. Denny , Rhoda A. Owens , Kristi L. Jean , Bo Liang , MD Hasib Fakir , Victor Moreno Lozano , Mina Molani , Mary Labuhn , Charisse Vetsch , Darlene Hanson , Prakash Parthiban Selvakumar , Pantea Tavakolian
{"title":"Evaluating alternating pressure air mattress effectiveness through the measurement of skin redness and blood perfusion","authors":"Sukhveer Singh Sandhu , Dawn L. Denny , Rhoda A. Owens , Kristi L. Jean , Bo Liang , MD Hasib Fakir , Victor Moreno Lozano , Mina Molani , Mary Labuhn , Charisse Vetsch , Darlene Hanson , Prakash Parthiban Selvakumar , Pantea Tavakolian","doi":"10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a unique method to evaluate the effectiveness of Alternating Pressure Air Mattresses (APAMs) in preventing Pressure Injuries (PIs). We employed a Laser Speckle Blood Flow and Tissue Oxygenation Imager with color image gathering capabilities by Moor Instruments to quantify skin redness and blood perfusion (flux) in a research study involving 29 healthy participants across three surgical support surfaces: foam, gel, and APAM.</div><div>The methodology combined multimodal imaging with image segmentation and thresholding techniques to correlate visible skin redness with the underlying microcirculatory changes in perfusion (flux).</div><div>The results showed that APAMs exhibited the most significant initial increase in redness compared to baseline but also demonstrated the faster dissipation of concentrated redness and recovery of blood perfusion (flux) after offloading. A strong correlation (r = 0.63, P < 0.001) was observed between concentrated redness and blood flux for APAMs.</div><div>This approach goes beyond traditional incidence-based evaluations, providing insights into the dynamic tissue responses to different support surfaces. Our findings suggest that quantifying redness could be a practical and effective way to monitor individual patient responses to support surfaces, potentially leading to more personalized and effective PI prevention strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of tissue viability","volume":"34 3","pages":"Article 100904"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of tissue viability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965206X2500052X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a unique method to evaluate the effectiveness of Alternating Pressure Air Mattresses (APAMs) in preventing Pressure Injuries (PIs). We employed a Laser Speckle Blood Flow and Tissue Oxygenation Imager with color image gathering capabilities by Moor Instruments to quantify skin redness and blood perfusion (flux) in a research study involving 29 healthy participants across three surgical support surfaces: foam, gel, and APAM.
The methodology combined multimodal imaging with image segmentation and thresholding techniques to correlate visible skin redness with the underlying microcirculatory changes in perfusion (flux).
The results showed that APAMs exhibited the most significant initial increase in redness compared to baseline but also demonstrated the faster dissipation of concentrated redness and recovery of blood perfusion (flux) after offloading. A strong correlation (r = 0.63, P < 0.001) was observed between concentrated redness and blood flux for APAMs.
This approach goes beyond traditional incidence-based evaluations, providing insights into the dynamic tissue responses to different support surfaces. Our findings suggest that quantifying redness could be a practical and effective way to monitor individual patient responses to support surfaces, potentially leading to more personalized and effective PI prevention strategies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Tissue Viability is the official publication of the Tissue Viability Society and is a quarterly journal concerned with all aspects of the occurrence and treatment of wounds, ulcers and pressure sores including patient care, pain, nutrition, wound healing, research, prevention, mobility, social problems and management.
The Journal particularly encourages papers covering skin and skin wounds but will consider articles that discuss injury in any tissue. Articles that stress the multi-professional nature of tissue viability are especially welcome. We seek to encourage new authors as well as well-established contributors to the field - one aim of the journal is to enable all participants in tissue viability to share information with colleagues.