Mycotoxins hazard: the European view

IF 8.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Philippe Pinton, Chloe Terciolo , Delphine Payros , Isabelle P Oswald
{"title":"Mycotoxins hazard: the European view","authors":"Philippe Pinton,&nbsp;Chloe Terciolo ,&nbsp;Delphine Payros ,&nbsp;Isabelle P Oswald","doi":"10.1016/j.cofs.2025.101306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food and feed are likely to be contaminated by mycotoxins, toxic secondary metabolites produced by molds mainly from <em>Aspergillus</em>, <em>Fusarium</em>, and <em>Penicillium</em> genera. To characterize the hazard of these contaminants, published data on their toxicokinetics and toxicity are scrutinized to determine the human health-based guidance values and to identify reference points (RPs) for animal category and species. This review describes how these values are constructed and summarizes the human tolerable daily intake (TDI) for the <em>Fusarium</em> toxins, deoxynivalenol, nivalenol, T-2 and HT-2 toxins, zearalenone, and fumonisins but also for ochratoxin A, and ergot alkaloids. For carcinogenic mycotoxins such as aflatoxins, it is not possible to establish TDI, and the risk for human health is determined by the margin of exposure between the benchmark dose’s lower confidence limit and the exposure. This review also details, when they could be determined, the RPs for the same mycotoxins for ruminants (dairy cow, heifer, beef cattle, steer, sheep, goats), poultry (chicken, duck, turkey), porcine, solipeds, fish, rabbits, cats, and dogs.</div><div>It also addresses the difficulties and challenges involved in establishing TDIs and/or RPs with regard to (i) the lack of data (e.g. on emerging mycotoxins) and their quality, (ii) the availability of species- or sex-specific data, (iii) the consideration of clinical cases or a new, more sensitive endpoints, and (iv) the establishment of grouped TDIs/RPs and the consideration of possible interactions between mycotoxins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54291,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Food Science","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101306"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214799325000360","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food and feed are likely to be contaminated by mycotoxins, toxic secondary metabolites produced by molds mainly from Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium genera. To characterize the hazard of these contaminants, published data on their toxicokinetics and toxicity are scrutinized to determine the human health-based guidance values and to identify reference points (RPs) for animal category and species. This review describes how these values are constructed and summarizes the human tolerable daily intake (TDI) for the Fusarium toxins, deoxynivalenol, nivalenol, T-2 and HT-2 toxins, zearalenone, and fumonisins but also for ochratoxin A, and ergot alkaloids. For carcinogenic mycotoxins such as aflatoxins, it is not possible to establish TDI, and the risk for human health is determined by the margin of exposure between the benchmark dose’s lower confidence limit and the exposure. This review also details, when they could be determined, the RPs for the same mycotoxins for ruminants (dairy cow, heifer, beef cattle, steer, sheep, goats), poultry (chicken, duck, turkey), porcine, solipeds, fish, rabbits, cats, and dogs.
It also addresses the difficulties and challenges involved in establishing TDIs and/or RPs with regard to (i) the lack of data (e.g. on emerging mycotoxins) and their quality, (ii) the availability of species- or sex-specific data, (iii) the consideration of clinical cases or a new, more sensitive endpoints, and (iv) the establishment of grouped TDIs/RPs and the consideration of possible interactions between mycotoxins.
真菌毒素危害:欧洲人的观点
食品和饲料很可能被霉菌毒素污染,霉菌毒素是由主要来自曲霉属、镰刀菌属和青霉属的霉菌产生的有毒次生代谢物。为了描述这些污染物的危害特征,对已公布的有关其毒性动力学和毒性的数据进行了仔细审查,以确定基于人类健康的指导值,并确定动物类别和物种的参考点。这篇综述描述了这些值是如何构建的,并总结了镰刀菌毒素、脱氧雪腐镰刀菌醇、雪腐镰刀菌醇、T-2和HT-2毒素、玉米赤霉烯酮和伏马毒素以及赭曲霉毒素A和麦角生物碱的人体耐受日摄入量(TDI)。对于致癌性真菌毒素,如黄曲霉毒素,不可能确定TDI,对人类健康的风险取决于基准剂量的下限置信限与暴露之间的接触范围。如果可以确定,本综述还详细说明了相同真菌毒素对反刍动物(奶牛、小母牛、肉牛、阉牛、绵羊、山羊)、家禽(鸡、鸭、火鸡)、猪、固体、鱼、兔子、猫和狗的rp。它还解决了在以下方面建立tdi和/或rp所涉及的困难和挑战:(i)缺乏数据(例如关于新出现的真菌毒素)及其质量,(ii)物种或性别特异性数据的可获得性,(iii)考虑临床病例或新的、更敏感的终点,以及(iv)建立分组tdi / rp和考虑真菌毒素之间可能的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Food Science
Current Opinion in Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Food Science specifically provides expert views on current advances in food science in a clear and readable format. It also evaluates the most noteworthy papers from original publications, annotated by experts. Key Features: Expert Views on Current Advances: Clear and readable insights from experts in the field regarding current advances in food science. Evaluation of Noteworthy Papers: Annotated evaluations of the most interesting papers from the extensive array of original publications. Themed Sections: The subject of food science is divided into themed sections, each reviewed once a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信