Philippe Pinton, Chloe Terciolo , Delphine Payros , Isabelle P Oswald
{"title":"Mycotoxins hazard: the European view","authors":"Philippe Pinton, Chloe Terciolo , Delphine Payros , Isabelle P Oswald","doi":"10.1016/j.cofs.2025.101306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food and feed are likely to be contaminated by mycotoxins, toxic secondary metabolites produced by molds mainly from <em>Aspergillus</em>, <em>Fusarium</em>, and <em>Penicillium</em> genera. To characterize the hazard of these contaminants, published data on their toxicokinetics and toxicity are scrutinized to determine the human health-based guidance values and to identify reference points (RPs) for animal category and species. This review describes how these values are constructed and summarizes the human tolerable daily intake (TDI) for the <em>Fusarium</em> toxins, deoxynivalenol, nivalenol, T-2 and HT-2 toxins, zearalenone, and fumonisins but also for ochratoxin A, and ergot alkaloids. For carcinogenic mycotoxins such as aflatoxins, it is not possible to establish TDI, and the risk for human health is determined by the margin of exposure between the benchmark dose’s lower confidence limit and the exposure. This review also details, when they could be determined, the RPs for the same mycotoxins for ruminants (dairy cow, heifer, beef cattle, steer, sheep, goats), poultry (chicken, duck, turkey), porcine, solipeds, fish, rabbits, cats, and dogs.</div><div>It also addresses the difficulties and challenges involved in establishing TDIs and/or RPs with regard to (i) the lack of data (e.g. on emerging mycotoxins) and their quality, (ii) the availability of species- or sex-specific data, (iii) the consideration of clinical cases or a new, more sensitive endpoints, and (iv) the establishment of grouped TDIs/RPs and the consideration of possible interactions between mycotoxins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54291,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Food Science","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101306"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214799325000360","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Food and feed are likely to be contaminated by mycotoxins, toxic secondary metabolites produced by molds mainly from Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium genera. To characterize the hazard of these contaminants, published data on their toxicokinetics and toxicity are scrutinized to determine the human health-based guidance values and to identify reference points (RPs) for animal category and species. This review describes how these values are constructed and summarizes the human tolerable daily intake (TDI) for the Fusarium toxins, deoxynivalenol, nivalenol, T-2 and HT-2 toxins, zearalenone, and fumonisins but also for ochratoxin A, and ergot alkaloids. For carcinogenic mycotoxins such as aflatoxins, it is not possible to establish TDI, and the risk for human health is determined by the margin of exposure between the benchmark dose’s lower confidence limit and the exposure. This review also details, when they could be determined, the RPs for the same mycotoxins for ruminants (dairy cow, heifer, beef cattle, steer, sheep, goats), poultry (chicken, duck, turkey), porcine, solipeds, fish, rabbits, cats, and dogs.
It also addresses the difficulties and challenges involved in establishing TDIs and/or RPs with regard to (i) the lack of data (e.g. on emerging mycotoxins) and their quality, (ii) the availability of species- or sex-specific data, (iii) the consideration of clinical cases or a new, more sensitive endpoints, and (iv) the establishment of grouped TDIs/RPs and the consideration of possible interactions between mycotoxins.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Food Science specifically provides expert views on current advances in food science in a clear and readable format. It also evaluates the most noteworthy papers from original publications, annotated by experts.
Key Features:
Expert Views on Current Advances: Clear and readable insights from experts in the field regarding current advances in food science.
Evaluation of Noteworthy Papers: Annotated evaluations of the most interesting papers from the extensive array of original publications.
Themed Sections: The subject of food science is divided into themed sections, each reviewed once a year.