Safety and efficacy of extended expectant management in preterm premature rupture of membrane between 32 and 34 weeks of pregnancy-A randomization control trial

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Deepti Ghosh , Pramila Jena , Partha Sarathi Sahu , Deepti Damayanty Pradhan , Jyochnamayi Panda , Bandita Panda
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of extended expectant management in preterm premature rupture of membrane between 32 and 34 weeks of pregnancy-A randomization control trial","authors":"Deepti Ghosh ,&nbsp;Pramila Jena ,&nbsp;Partha Sarathi Sahu ,&nbsp;Deepti Damayanty Pradhan ,&nbsp;Jyochnamayi Panda ,&nbsp;Bandita Panda","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.113971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cases of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) occur in approximately 3 % of pregnancies and are a significant contributor to preterm birth and its associated complications. Traditionally expectant management followed by delivery at 34 weeks is the recommended standard for treatment of PPROM but recent evidence suggests that extended expectant management in selected cases improves the pregnancy outcome. Thus the study aims to compare the feto-maternal outcome in PPROM cases between traditional management (delivery at 34 weeks) and extended expectant management (delivery at 36 weeks)</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>Women presenting to labor emergency with leakage due to membrane rupture at 32 to 34 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned as per CONSORT guidelines into two groups, group A (n = 72) with traditional treatment and group B (n = 72) with extended expectant management. The pregnancy outcomes and feto-maternal outcomes of both groups were analyzed by appropriate statistical tools.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of a total of 144 cases with comparable baseline characteristics, 72 patients in group A had the mean gestational age at delivery was 34.02 weeks and in group B it was 35.02 weeks. There is no significant increase in chorioamnionitis and other maternal morbidity in group B. The mean birth weight was significantly higher in group B patients<strong>.</strong> The median duration of NICU stay, need for mechanical ventilation and complications like neonatal jaundice and necrotizing enterocolitis were significantly lower (p-value &lt; 0.05) in Group B as compared to Group A reflecting a better perinatal outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Extended expectant management can safely be considered in PPROM cases till 36 weeks based on the timing of onset of PPROM without the fear of increased risk of maternal chorioamnionitis and adverse neonatal outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"310 ","pages":"Article 113971"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525002404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cases of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) occur in approximately 3 % of pregnancies and are a significant contributor to preterm birth and its associated complications. Traditionally expectant management followed by delivery at 34 weeks is the recommended standard for treatment of PPROM but recent evidence suggests that extended expectant management in selected cases improves the pregnancy outcome. Thus the study aims to compare the feto-maternal outcome in PPROM cases between traditional management (delivery at 34 weeks) and extended expectant management (delivery at 36 weeks)

Methodology

Women presenting to labor emergency with leakage due to membrane rupture at 32 to 34 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned as per CONSORT guidelines into two groups, group A (n = 72) with traditional treatment and group B (n = 72) with extended expectant management. The pregnancy outcomes and feto-maternal outcomes of both groups were analyzed by appropriate statistical tools.

Results

Out of a total of 144 cases with comparable baseline characteristics, 72 patients in group A had the mean gestational age at delivery was 34.02 weeks and in group B it was 35.02 weeks. There is no significant increase in chorioamnionitis and other maternal morbidity in group B. The mean birth weight was significantly higher in group B patients. The median duration of NICU stay, need for mechanical ventilation and complications like neonatal jaundice and necrotizing enterocolitis were significantly lower (p-value < 0.05) in Group B as compared to Group A reflecting a better perinatal outcome.

Conclusion

Extended expectant management can safely be considered in PPROM cases till 36 weeks based on the timing of onset of PPROM without the fear of increased risk of maternal chorioamnionitis and adverse neonatal outcomes.
妊娠32 ~ 34周胎膜早破延长妊娠管理的安全性和有效性——一项随机对照试验
背景:早产胎膜早破(PPROM)的发生率约为3%,是早产及其相关并发症的重要因素。传统上,在34周分娩后进行预期治疗是PPROM治疗的推荐标准,但最近的证据表明,在某些情况下延长预期治疗可改善妊娠结局。因此,本研究旨在比较传统管理(34周分娩)和延长妊娠管理(36周分娩)对PPROM病例的胎母结局的影响。方法根据CONSORT指南,将32 ~ 34周因胎膜破裂而出现产程紧急情况的妇女随机分为两组,A组(n = 72)采用传统治疗,B组(n = 72)采用延长妊娠管理。对两组妊娠结局及胎母结局进行统计学分析。结果144例基线特征比较的患者中,a组72例平均胎龄为34.02周,B组为35.02周。B组患者的绒毛膜羊膜炎和其他产妇发病率没有明显增加。B组患者的平均出生体重明显高于B组患者。新生儿重症监护病房的中位住院时间、机械通气需求以及新生儿黄疸和坏死性小肠结肠炎等并发症均显著降低(p值<;0.05),反映出B组围产儿预后较A组好。结论根据胎膜早破的发病时间,可考虑延长妊娠至36周,无需担心产妇羊膜炎风险增加和新生儿不良结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信