Reliable Quantum-Chemistry Heats of Formation for an Extensive Set of C-, H-, N-, O-, F-, S-, Cl-, Br-Containing Molecules in the NIST Chemistry Webbook

IF 2.7 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Bun Chan*, 
{"title":"Reliable Quantum-Chemistry Heats of Formation for an Extensive Set of C-, H-, N-, O-, F-, S-, Cl-, Br-Containing Molecules in the NIST Chemistry Webbook","authors":"Bun Chan*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpca.5c0047610.1021/acs.jpca.5c00476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In the present study, we have computed the heat of formation (HOF) for over 500 C-, H-, N-, O-, F-, S-, Cl-, Br-containing molecules in the NIST Chemistry Webbook with a previously established methodology [from the highest- to lowest-level methods, W1X-2, CCSD(T)-F12b, DSD-PBEP86, and ωB97M-V, with the lower levels calibrated against higher levels for the atomic energies, see: <cite><i>J. Phys. Chem. A</i></cite> <span>2022</span>, <em>126</em>, 4981–4990]. We find a reasonable level of agreement between the computed and NIST values for the present set of species. However, the set of F-containing compounds shows considerably larger discrepancies, which can in part be attributed to dubious experimental values, as we have demonstrated in some cases. With our highest-level computed HOFs, we validated the lower-level methods used in our protocol. Specifically, CCSD(T)-F12b yields chemically accurate (±4.2 kJ mol<sup>–1</sup>) values for all types of molecules, while DSD-PBEP86 and ωB97M-V yield similar levels of accuracy for most systems, with key exceptions being molecules with numerous electron-withdrawing F and NO<sub>2</sub> groups. Our results further support the use of the protocol for the computation of HOFs, particularly for systems with few reliable reference values.</p>","PeriodicalId":59,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","volume":"129 15","pages":"3578–3586 3578–3586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c00476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, we have computed the heat of formation (HOF) for over 500 C-, H-, N-, O-, F-, S-, Cl-, Br-containing molecules in the NIST Chemistry Webbook with a previously established methodology [from the highest- to lowest-level methods, W1X-2, CCSD(T)-F12b, DSD-PBEP86, and ωB97M-V, with the lower levels calibrated against higher levels for the atomic energies, see: J. Phys. Chem. A 2022, 126, 4981–4990]. We find a reasonable level of agreement between the computed and NIST values for the present set of species. However, the set of F-containing compounds shows considerably larger discrepancies, which can in part be attributed to dubious experimental values, as we have demonstrated in some cases. With our highest-level computed HOFs, we validated the lower-level methods used in our protocol. Specifically, CCSD(T)-F12b yields chemically accurate (±4.2 kJ mol–1) values for all types of molecules, while DSD-PBEP86 and ωB97M-V yield similar levels of accuracy for most systems, with key exceptions being molecules with numerous electron-withdrawing F and NO2 groups. Our results further support the use of the protocol for the computation of HOFs, particularly for systems with few reliable reference values.

Abstract Image

NIST 化学网络手册中大量含 C-、H-、N-、O-、F-、S-、Cl-、Br 分子的可靠量子化学形成热
在本研究中,我们采用先前建立的方法计算了 NIST 化学网络手册中 500 多种含 C-、H-、N-、O-、F-、S-、Cl-、Br- 分子的形成热(HOF)[从最高级到最低级别的方法:W1X-2、CCSD(T)-F12b、DSD-PBEP86 和 ωB97M-V,其中低级别方法的原子能量是根据高级别方法校准的,见《物理化学杂志》(J Phys Chem: J. Phys.A 2022, 126, 4981-4990].我们发现本组物种的计算值与 NIST 值之间存在合理的一致程度。然而,含 F 化合物的计算值与 NIST 数值之间的差异要大得多,这部分可归因于可疑的实验值,我们已在某些情况下证明了这一点。通过最高级别的 HOFs 计算,我们验证了协议中使用的低级别方法。具体来说,CCSD(T)-F12b 对所有类型的分子都得出了化学精确值(±4.2 kJ mol-1),而 DSD-PBEP86 和 ωB97M-V 对大多数体系都得出了类似的精确度,但含有大量电子吸收 F 和 NO2 基团的分子除外。我们的研究结果进一步支持将该协议用于计算 HOF,尤其是对于缺乏可靠参考值的体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
922
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Chemistry A is devoted to reporting new and original experimental and theoretical basic research of interest to physical chemists, biophysical chemists, and chemical physicists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信