Improving spectroscopic detection limits with multi-pixel signal-to-noise ratio calculations: Application to the SHERLOC instrument aboard the perseverance rover

IF 5.7 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Ryan S. Jakubek , Rohit Bhartia , Andrew Steele , Sanford A. Asher , William Abbey , Sergei V. Bykov , Andrew D. Czaja , Marc D. Fries , Carina Lee , Francis M. McCubbin , Michelle Minitti , Sunanda Sharma , Kyle Uckert
{"title":"Improving spectroscopic detection limits with multi-pixel signal-to-noise ratio calculations: Application to the SHERLOC instrument aboard the perseverance rover","authors":"Ryan S. Jakubek ,&nbsp;Rohit Bhartia ,&nbsp;Andrew Steele ,&nbsp;Sanford A. Asher ,&nbsp;William Abbey ,&nbsp;Sergei V. Bykov ,&nbsp;Andrew D. Czaja ,&nbsp;Marc D. Fries ,&nbsp;Carina Lee ,&nbsp;Francis M. McCubbin ,&nbsp;Michelle Minitti ,&nbsp;Sunanda Sharma ,&nbsp;Kyle Uckert","doi":"10.1016/j.aca.2025.344072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Scanning Habitable Environments with Raman and Luminescence for Organics and Chemicals (SHERLOC) instrument on NASA's Perseverance rover is a deep ultraviolet Raman and fluorescence instrument used for organic and mineral mapping of the Martian surface. Flight instrument design and operational constraints lead to observations with low signal Raman features that must be statistically differentiated from measurement noise. There are many methods to calculate signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) in the Raman literature and we find that these are not equivalent. <strong>Thus, there is a need to 1) understand the differences and assumptions within SNR calculations, 2) aid in the comparison of SNR values across literature, and 3) identify SNR calculation methods that optimize limit-of-detection (LOD) based on the instrument characteristics.</strong></div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>We quantitatively compare methods in which signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) are calculated in Raman spectroscopy. Methods are separated into two broad categories, multi-pixel methods that utilize information across the full Raman bandwidth and single-pixel methods that use only the center pixel in the Raman band. We compare three SNR calculation methods on a standardized SHERLOC data set and show that multi-pixel methods detect spectral bands prior to single-pixel methods. This occurs because single-pixel methods only include signal from one pixel, ignoring the remaining signal across the bandwidth. While the manuscript focuses on Raman spectroscopy for application to SHERLOC data, the SNR calculation methodology can be utilized by any technique that reports spectral data.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This work is the first to report significant differences between methods of calculating spectroscopic SNR. This manuscript is of broad application with at least 3 points of major impact: 1) different SNR calculation methods are not equivalent and cannot be compared across literature, 2) multi-pixel SNR methods include signal from across the entire Raman bandwidth, improving the assessment of spectral features compared to single-pixel methods, and 3) we confirm a SHERLOC signal previously interpreted as the first Raman detection of organic carbon on the martian surface.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":240,"journal":{"name":"Analytica Chimica Acta","volume":"1357 ","pages":"Article 344072"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267025004660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Scanning Habitable Environments with Raman and Luminescence for Organics and Chemicals (SHERLOC) instrument on NASA's Perseverance rover is a deep ultraviolet Raman and fluorescence instrument used for organic and mineral mapping of the Martian surface. Flight instrument design and operational constraints lead to observations with low signal Raman features that must be statistically differentiated from measurement noise. There are many methods to calculate signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) in the Raman literature and we find that these are not equivalent. Thus, there is a need to 1) understand the differences and assumptions within SNR calculations, 2) aid in the comparison of SNR values across literature, and 3) identify SNR calculation methods that optimize limit-of-detection (LOD) based on the instrument characteristics.

Result

We quantitatively compare methods in which signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) are calculated in Raman spectroscopy. Methods are separated into two broad categories, multi-pixel methods that utilize information across the full Raman bandwidth and single-pixel methods that use only the center pixel in the Raman band. We compare three SNR calculation methods on a standardized SHERLOC data set and show that multi-pixel methods detect spectral bands prior to single-pixel methods. This occurs because single-pixel methods only include signal from one pixel, ignoring the remaining signal across the bandwidth. While the manuscript focuses on Raman spectroscopy for application to SHERLOC data, the SNR calculation methodology can be utilized by any technique that reports spectral data.

Significance

This work is the first to report significant differences between methods of calculating spectroscopic SNR. This manuscript is of broad application with at least 3 points of major impact: 1) different SNR calculation methods are not equivalent and cannot be compared across literature, 2) multi-pixel SNR methods include signal from across the entire Raman bandwidth, improving the assessment of spectral features compared to single-pixel methods, and 3) we confirm a SHERLOC signal previously interpreted as the first Raman detection of organic carbon on the martian surface.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用多像素信噪比计算提高光谱检测极限:在毅力号探测器SHERLOC仪器上的应用
NASA毅力号探测器上的拉曼和有机化学发光扫描适居环境(SHERLOC)仪器是一种深紫外拉曼和荧光仪器,用于火星表面的有机和矿物测绘。飞行仪器的设计和操作限制导致观测结果具有低信号拉曼特征,必须从统计上与测量噪声区分开来。在拉曼文献中有许多计算信噪比(SNR)的方法,我们发现这些方法并不等效。因此,需要1)了解信噪比计算中的差异和假设,2)帮助比较文献中的信噪比值,以及3)确定基于仪器特性优化检测限(LOD)的信噪比计算方法。结果对拉曼光谱中信噪比的计算方法进行了定量比较。方法分为两大类,利用整个拉曼带宽信息的多像素方法和仅使用拉曼波段中心像素的单像素方法。我们在标准化SHERLOC数据集上比较了三种信噪比计算方法,结果表明,多像素方法比单像素方法更能检测到光谱波段。这是因为单像素方法只包括来自一个像素的信号,忽略了带宽上的剩余信号。虽然手稿侧重于拉曼光谱应用于SHERLOC数据,但信噪比计算方法可用于报告光谱数据的任何技术。这项工作首次报道了计算光谱信噪比的方法之间的显著差异。该论文具有广泛的应用,至少有3点具有重大影响:1)不同的信噪比计算方法不等效,无法在文献中进行比较;2)多像元信噪比方法包括整个拉曼带宽的信号,与单像元方法相比,改进了光谱特征的评估;3)我们确认了SHERLOC信号先前被解释为火星表面有机碳的第一次拉曼检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Analytica Chimica Acta
Analytica Chimica Acta 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1081
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Analytica Chimica Acta has an open access mirror journal Analytica Chimica Acta: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Analytica Chimica Acta provides a forum for the rapid publication of original research, and critical, comprehensive reviews dealing with all aspects of fundamental and applied modern analytical chemistry. The journal welcomes the submission of research papers which report studies concerning the development of new and significant analytical methodologies. In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny will be placed on the degree of novelty and impact of the research and the extent to which it adds to the existing body of knowledge in analytical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信