Negative Effects During Placebo Treatment

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Tom Bschor, Josephine Unger, Lea Nagel, Guido Schwarzer, Christopher Baethge
{"title":"Negative Effects During Placebo Treatment","authors":"Tom Bschor, Josephine Unger, Lea Nagel, Guido Schwarzer, Christopher Baethge","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceAnalyzing effects within placebo groups allows for transdiagnostic comparisons, as placebo is the only substance systematically studied across all major psychiatric diagnoses. Recently, the study team meta-analytically showed that improvement under placebo varies across major psychiatric diagnoses. However, comprehensive transdiagnostic comparisons of negative effects under placebo (nocebo effects) are lacking.ObjectiveTo compare premature study termination rates in placebo groups of high-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs) across 9 major psychiatric disorders, focusing on total dropouts, dropouts due to adverse events, and dropouts due to lack of effect.Data SourcesThis analysis is part of a broader research project using a systematic approach to identifying the most recent high-quality systematic review for each diagnosis (Open-Science-Foundation preregistered: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https://osf.io/u469a/\">u469a</jats:ext-link>).Study SelectionFrom these reviews, the 10 highest quality and most recent placebo-controlled RCTs were selected for each diagnosis, totaling 90 RCTs.Data Extraction and SynthesisSearches and data extraction were conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook. Pooled dropout rates (DRs) with 95% CIs were calculated.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was total DR per diagnosis, determined in random-effects meta-analyses. Diagnostic differences were tested for statistical significance using <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic> tests. Potential confounders were examined in multivariable meta-regression analyses.ResultsEighty-six of the 90 studies reported total DRs (10 056 participants). DR differed between diagnoses (<jats:italic>Q</jats:italic> = 82.2; <jats:italic>df</jats:italic> = 8; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001), with schizophrenia (DR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.35-0.48), panic disorder, and mania showing the highest rates, and posttraumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (DR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.11-0.25) had the lowest. Schizophrenia and mania also had the highest DR due to lack of effect, while ADHD and MDD had the lowest (<jats:italic>Q</jats:italic> = 71.3; <jats:italic>df</jats:italic> = 8; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). Most dropouts due to adverse events occurred in obsessive-compulsive disorder (DR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.05-0.09) and panic disorder studies and the fewest occurred in MDD and ADHD trials (<jats:italic>Q</jats:italic> = 32.1; <jats:italic>df</jats:italic> = 8; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). Meta-regression revealed no additional associated factors on DRs.Conclusion and RelevanceThese findings indicate that placebo treatment is associated with adverse effects that differ among psychiatric diagnoses. The main negative effect was lack of effect, with diagnostic variations corroborating findings on positive placebo response from earlier analyses. Schizophrenia had the least favorable course under placebo, while MDD demonstrated the most favorable.","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0336","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceAnalyzing effects within placebo groups allows for transdiagnostic comparisons, as placebo is the only substance systematically studied across all major psychiatric diagnoses. Recently, the study team meta-analytically showed that improvement under placebo varies across major psychiatric diagnoses. However, comprehensive transdiagnostic comparisons of negative effects under placebo (nocebo effects) are lacking.ObjectiveTo compare premature study termination rates in placebo groups of high-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs) across 9 major psychiatric disorders, focusing on total dropouts, dropouts due to adverse events, and dropouts due to lack of effect.Data SourcesThis analysis is part of a broader research project using a systematic approach to identifying the most recent high-quality systematic review for each diagnosis (Open-Science-Foundation preregistered: u469a).Study SelectionFrom these reviews, the 10 highest quality and most recent placebo-controlled RCTs were selected for each diagnosis, totaling 90 RCTs.Data Extraction and SynthesisSearches and data extraction were conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook. Pooled dropout rates (DRs) with 95% CIs were calculated.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was total DR per diagnosis, determined in random-effects meta-analyses. Diagnostic differences were tested for statistical significance using Q tests. Potential confounders were examined in multivariable meta-regression analyses.ResultsEighty-six of the 90 studies reported total DRs (10 056 participants). DR differed between diagnoses (Q = 82.2; df = 8; P &amp;lt; .001), with schizophrenia (DR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.35-0.48), panic disorder, and mania showing the highest rates, and posttraumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (DR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.11-0.25) had the lowest. Schizophrenia and mania also had the highest DR due to lack of effect, while ADHD and MDD had the lowest (Q = 71.3; df = 8; P &amp;lt; .001). Most dropouts due to adverse events occurred in obsessive-compulsive disorder (DR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.05-0.09) and panic disorder studies and the fewest occurred in MDD and ADHD trials (Q = 32.1; df = 8; P &amp;lt; .001). Meta-regression revealed no additional associated factors on DRs.Conclusion and RelevanceThese findings indicate that placebo treatment is associated with adverse effects that differ among psychiatric diagnoses. The main negative effect was lack of effect, with diagnostic variations corroborating findings on positive placebo response from earlier analyses. Schizophrenia had the least favorable course under placebo, while MDD demonstrated the most favorable.
安慰剂治疗期间的负面影响
重要性分析安慰剂组的效果可以进行跨诊断比较,因为安慰剂是唯一在所有主要精神病诊断中系统研究的物质。最近,研究小组荟萃分析表明,安慰剂的改善在主要精神疾病诊断中有所不同。然而,缺乏对安慰剂(反安慰剂效应)的负面影响进行全面的跨诊断比较。目的比较9种主要精神疾病的高质量随机临床试验(rct)中安慰剂组的过早研究终止率,重点关注总退出、不良事件退出和缺乏效果退出。数据来源该分析是一个更广泛的研究项目的一部分,该项目使用系统方法确定每种诊断的最新高质量系统评价(开放科学基金会预注册:u469a)。研究选择从这些综述中,为每个诊断选择10个最高质量和最新的安慰剂对照随机对照试验,共计90个随机对照试验。数据提取与合成根据Cochrane手册进行检索和数据提取。计算95% ci的合并退学率(DRs)。主要结局和测量:主要结局是每次诊断的总DR,在随机效应荟萃分析中确定。采用Q检验对诊断差异进行统计学显著性检验。在多变量元回归分析中检查潜在的混杂因素。结果90项研究中有86项报告了总dr(10,056名受试者)。诊断间DR差异(Q = 82.2;Df = 8;P, amp;肝移植;.001),精神分裂症(DR, 0.41;95% CI, 0.35-0.48),惊恐障碍和躁狂症的发生率最高,创伤后应激障碍,重度抑郁症(MDD)和注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD) (DR, 0.17;95% CI(0.11-0.25)最低。由于缺乏疗效,精神分裂症和躁狂症的DR也最高,而ADHD和MDD最低(Q = 71.3;Df = 8;P, amp;肝移植;措施)。大多数因不良事件而退出的患者为强迫症患者(DR, 0.07;95% CI, 0.05-0.09)和惊恐障碍研究,MDD和ADHD试验中出现的发生率最低(Q = 32.1;Df = 8;P, amp;肝移植;措施)。meta回归显示dr没有其他相关因素。结论和相关性这些发现表明,安慰剂治疗与不同精神病诊断的不良反应相关。主要的负面影响是缺乏效果,诊断差异证实了早期分析中安慰剂阳性反应的发现。在安慰剂组中,精神分裂症的病程最差,而重度抑郁症的病程最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信