On Rhetorical Theory and Criticism in Sport Communication

IF 2.8 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Michael L. Butterworth
{"title":"On Rhetorical Theory and Criticism in Sport Communication","authors":"Michael L. Butterworth","doi":"10.1177/21674795251331024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using Cummins and Hahn’s review of Communication & Sport as an invitation to consider future directions in research, this commentary suggests sport communication scholars can do more to engage with the contributions of rhetorical theory and criticism. While Cummins and Hahn rightly point to the field’s overall limited engagement with method and theory, they may miss the epistemological assumptions at play which guide the use of method and theory in rhetorical studies. This essay offers some counterpoints, using several representative publications to demonstrate rhetoric’s guiding epistemology.","PeriodicalId":46882,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Sport","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Sport","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795251331024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using Cummins and Hahn’s review of Communication & Sport as an invitation to consider future directions in research, this commentary suggests sport communication scholars can do more to engage with the contributions of rhetorical theory and criticism. While Cummins and Hahn rightly point to the field’s overall limited engagement with method and theory, they may miss the epistemological assumptions at play which guide the use of method and theory in rhetorical studies. This essay offers some counterpoints, using several representative publications to demonstrate rhetoric’s guiding epistemology.
论体育传播中的修辞理论与批评
利用康明斯和哈恩对《传播》的回顾;体育作为一个考虑未来研究方向的邀请,这篇评论建议体育传播学者可以做更多的工作来参与修辞理论和批评的贡献。虽然康明斯和哈恩正确地指出了该领域对方法和理论的总体有限参与,但他们可能错过了在修辞研究中指导方法和理论使用的认识论假设。本文以几篇有代表性的论文为对照,论证修辞学的认识论指导思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信