A Novel Assessment of Sagittal Proximal Tibial Morphology and Relationship to Proximal Posterior Tibial Slope: Lateral Supratubercle Angle.

Alfred Mansour,Alexis Aboulafia,Nicole Lemaster,Jessica Dziuba,Nikhil Gattu,Hayden Anz,William Brooks,Jaremy Rodriguez,Walter Lowe
{"title":"A Novel Assessment of Sagittal Proximal Tibial Morphology and Relationship to Proximal Posterior Tibial Slope: Lateral Supratubercle Angle.","authors":"Alfred Mansour,Alexis Aboulafia,Nicole Lemaster,Jessica Dziuba,Nikhil Gattu,Hayden Anz,William Brooks,Jaremy Rodriguez,Walter Lowe","doi":"10.1177/03635465251331005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nMultiple techniques have been utilized to measure posterior tibial slope (PTS) without consensus on which imaging modality, view, and axis combination is most consistent for risk assessment and preoperative planning in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. An exclusively proximal-based measurement of PTS has yet to be defined.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS\r\nThe purpose of this study was to establish normal values for novel measurements of sagittal proximal tibial morphology, the lateral supratubercle angle (LSTA) and the lateral supratubercle distance (LSTD), in normative and primary ACL tear cohorts. The secondary aim was to establish cutoff values and determine if these tibial measurement values are predictive of the presence of an ACL tear. It was hypothesized that LSTA will be significantly different between cohorts.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nCase-control study; Level of evidence, 3.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe medical records of patients with a knee complaint between August 2016 and June 2024 were retrospectively reviewed, and the patients were placed into either the normative or primary ACL tear cohort. Three independent observers measured LSTA, LSTD, and PTS along both the lateral (L) and medial (M) tibial plateaus on standard lateral knee radiographs. Means were calculated for each measurement and compared between groups. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of significant measurements.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSignificant differences were found between normative (n = 150) and primary ACL tear (n = 150) groups in LSTA-L (normative: 9.9°± 4.4° vs primary ACL tear: 11.1°± 4.4°; P = .02), LSTA-M (normative: 10.3°± 4.4° vs ACL tear: 11.4°± 4.6°; P = .03), and PTS-M (normative: 9.2°± 3.2° vs primary ACL tear: 10.0°± 3.1°; P = .03).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nMean values and ranges for LSTA and LSTD have been established in normative and primary ACL tear cohorts. LSTA-L, LSTA-M, and PTS-M significantly differed between the cohorts. Future studies with LSTA will evaluate the utilization of these proximal tibial deformity-based measurements in ACL surgery, retear risk assessment, and slope-reducing osteotomy planning.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"310 1","pages":"3635465251331005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251331005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Multiple techniques have been utilized to measure posterior tibial slope (PTS) without consensus on which imaging modality, view, and axis combination is most consistent for risk assessment and preoperative planning in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. An exclusively proximal-based measurement of PTS has yet to be defined. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The purpose of this study was to establish normal values for novel measurements of sagittal proximal tibial morphology, the lateral supratubercle angle (LSTA) and the lateral supratubercle distance (LSTD), in normative and primary ACL tear cohorts. The secondary aim was to establish cutoff values and determine if these tibial measurement values are predictive of the presence of an ACL tear. It was hypothesized that LSTA will be significantly different between cohorts. STUDY DESIGN Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS The medical records of patients with a knee complaint between August 2016 and June 2024 were retrospectively reviewed, and the patients were placed into either the normative or primary ACL tear cohort. Three independent observers measured LSTA, LSTD, and PTS along both the lateral (L) and medial (M) tibial plateaus on standard lateral knee radiographs. Means were calculated for each measurement and compared between groups. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of significant measurements. RESULTS Significant differences were found between normative (n = 150) and primary ACL tear (n = 150) groups in LSTA-L (normative: 9.9°± 4.4° vs primary ACL tear: 11.1°± 4.4°; P = .02), LSTA-M (normative: 10.3°± 4.4° vs ACL tear: 11.4°± 4.6°; P = .03), and PTS-M (normative: 9.2°± 3.2° vs primary ACL tear: 10.0°± 3.1°; P = .03). CONCLUSION Mean values and ranges for LSTA and LSTD have been established in normative and primary ACL tear cohorts. LSTA-L, LSTA-M, and PTS-M significantly differed between the cohorts. Future studies with LSTA will evaluate the utilization of these proximal tibial deformity-based measurements in ACL surgery, retear risk assessment, and slope-reducing osteotomy planning.
胫骨近端矢状面形态的新评估及其与胫骨近端后斜度的关系:外侧关节上角。
背景:在原发性和翻修性前交叉韧带(ACL)手术中,多种技术被用于测量胫骨后斜率(PTS),但对于哪种成像方式、视角和轴组合最符合风险评估和术前计划,尚未达成共识。一种完全基于近端的PTS测量方法尚未确定。目的/假设本研究的目的是建立正常和原发性ACL撕裂队列中胫骨近端矢状面形态、外侧关节上角(LSTA)和外侧关节上距离(LSTD)的新测量值的正常值。第二个目的是建立临界值,并确定这些胫骨测量值是否可以预测ACL撕裂的存在。假设LSTA在队列之间存在显著差异。研究设计:病例对照研究;证据水平,3。方法回顾性分析2016年8月至2024年6月膝关节主诉患者的医疗记录,将患者分为常规和原发性前交叉韧带撕裂组。三名独立观察员在标准膝外侧x线片上沿外侧(L)和内侧(M)胫骨平台测量LSTA、LSTD和PTS。计算每次测量的平均值,并进行组间比较。采用受试者工作特性曲线确定重要测量值的敏感性和特异性。结果LSTA-L规范组(n = 150)与原发性ACL撕裂组(n = 150)比较差异有统计学意义(规范组:9.9°±4.4°vs原发性ACL撕裂:11.1°±4.4°;P = 0.02), LSTA-M(正常:10.3°±4.4°vs ACL撕裂:11.4°±4.6°;P = .03), PTS-M(规范:9.2°±3.2°vs原发性ACL撕裂:10.0°±3.1°;P = .03)。结论LSTA和LSTD在正常和原发性ACL撕裂队列中的平均值和范围已经确定。LSTA-L、LSTA-M和PTS-M在队列之间存在显著差异。未来的LSTA研究将评估这些基于胫骨近端变形的测量在前交叉韧带手术、撕裂风险评估和减坡截骨计划中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信