Barriers and Facilitators of NHS Health Checks in Socioeconomically Deprived Communities in the North East of England: A Qualitative Study With Peer Researchers

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Judith Eberhardt, Laura Kane, Robert Portman, Jonathan Ling, Tracy Goddard, Mark Johnston, Claire Robinson, Abigail Reay, Andrew Divers, Dorothy Newbury-Birch
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators of NHS Health Checks in Socioeconomically Deprived Communities in the North East of England: A Qualitative Study With Peer Researchers","authors":"Judith Eberhardt,&nbsp;Laura Kane,&nbsp;Robert Portman,&nbsp;Jonathan Ling,&nbsp;Tracy Goddard,&nbsp;Mark Johnston,&nbsp;Claire Robinson,&nbsp;Abigail Reay,&nbsp;Andrew Divers,&nbsp;Dorothy Newbury-Birch","doi":"10.1111/hex.70199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Preventive health services, such as the NHS Health Check programme, aim to identify and address key health risks, yet participation is particularly low in socioeconomically deprived areas, such as the North East of England. Understanding barriers and facilitators to engagement is critical to improving access and outcomes for these communities. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to NHS Health Check attendance in these underserved communities using a participatory research approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study employed a qualitative design with a participatory approach, involving peer researchers from the target communities. Two peer research associates (PRAs) from socioeconomically deprived areas were trained to conduct semi-structured online or telephone interviews with 12 community members eligible for NHS Health Checks. Additionally, 5 stakeholders involved in the programme's delivery were interviewed. Thematic analysis was conducted in collaboration with the PRAs to ensure community perspectives were authentically captured.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Barriers to participation included limited awareness, cultural perceptions of self-reliance, fear of health-related discoveries, mistrust of healthcare systems and logistical challenges exacerbated by structural inequalities. Participants emphasised the need for culturally tailored communication and flexible, accessible health checks. Stakeholders highlighted the role of collaboration, targeted outreach and digital tools in addressing these barriers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study highlights key barriers to NHS Health Check uptake in socioeconomically deprived communities in the North East of England. Improving communication, increasing accessibility through community-based services and building trust in healthcare are recommended key strategies to enhance participation and reduce health inequalities in these regions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Peer researchers, individuals with lived experience of being from socioeconomically deprived communities in North East England and eligible for NHS Health Checks, were involved in the design and conduct of this study. They were trained to conduct interviews with community members and contributed to the thematic analysis, ensuring that public perspectives were integral to the interpretation of the data.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70199","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Preventive health services, such as the NHS Health Check programme, aim to identify and address key health risks, yet participation is particularly low in socioeconomically deprived areas, such as the North East of England. Understanding barriers and facilitators to engagement is critical to improving access and outcomes for these communities. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to NHS Health Check attendance in these underserved communities using a participatory research approach.

Methods

This study employed a qualitative design with a participatory approach, involving peer researchers from the target communities. Two peer research associates (PRAs) from socioeconomically deprived areas were trained to conduct semi-structured online or telephone interviews with 12 community members eligible for NHS Health Checks. Additionally, 5 stakeholders involved in the programme's delivery were interviewed. Thematic analysis was conducted in collaboration with the PRAs to ensure community perspectives were authentically captured.

Results

Barriers to participation included limited awareness, cultural perceptions of self-reliance, fear of health-related discoveries, mistrust of healthcare systems and logistical challenges exacerbated by structural inequalities. Participants emphasised the need for culturally tailored communication and flexible, accessible health checks. Stakeholders highlighted the role of collaboration, targeted outreach and digital tools in addressing these barriers.

Conclusion

The study highlights key barriers to NHS Health Check uptake in socioeconomically deprived communities in the North East of England. Improving communication, increasing accessibility through community-based services and building trust in healthcare are recommended key strategies to enhance participation and reduce health inequalities in these regions.

Patient or Public Contribution

Peer researchers, individuals with lived experience of being from socioeconomically deprived communities in North East England and eligible for NHS Health Checks, were involved in the design and conduct of this study. They were trained to conduct interviews with community members and contributed to the thematic analysis, ensuring that public perspectives were integral to the interpretation of the data.

英国东北部社会经济贫困社区NHS健康检查的障碍和促进因素:与同行研究人员的定性研究
预防性保健服务,如国民保健制度健康检查方案,旨在确定和解决主要的健康风险,但在社会经济贫困地区,如英格兰东北部,参与程度特别低。了解参与的障碍和促进因素对于改善这些社区的获取和成果至关重要。本研究旨在利用参与式研究方法探讨在这些服务不足的社区中NHS健康检查出勤率的障碍和促进因素。方法本研究采用定性设计和参与式方法,涉及目标社区的同行研究人员。来自社会经济贫困地区的两名同行研究助理(PRAs)接受了培训,对12名有资格接受国民保健制度健康检查的社区成员进行半结构化的在线或电话访谈。此外,还采访了参与方案实施的5名利益相关者。专题分析是与民政事务处合作进行的,以确保真实地了解社区的观点。结果参与的障碍包括有限的意识,自力更生的文化观念,对健康相关发现的恐惧,对医疗保健系统的不信任以及由于结构性不平等而加剧的后勤挑战。与会者强调有必要根据不同文化进行沟通,并进行灵活、方便的健康检查。利益攸关方强调了协作、有针对性的外联和数字工具在解决这些障碍方面的作用。该研究强调了英格兰东北部社会经济贫困社区NHS健康检查吸收的主要障碍。建议的关键战略是改善沟通、通过社区服务增加可及性和建立对保健的信任,以促进这些区域的参与和减少保健不平等。同行研究人员,来自英格兰东北部社会经济贫困社区并有资格接受NHS健康检查的个人,参与了本研究的设计和实施。他们接受了与社区成员进行访谈的培训,并为专题分析做出了贡献,确保公众的观点是数据解释不可或缺的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信