Widening Patient Engagement for Rare Disease Drug Trials: The Perspectives of Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis on Participating in Clinical Drug Trials and Drug Trial Design
Julia Frost, Widening Engagement Patient Advisory Group, Jessica Mandizha, Steve Jones, Chantal van den Dungen, Lauren Asare, Catherine Pope
{"title":"Widening Patient Engagement for Rare Disease Drug Trials: The Perspectives of Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis on Participating in Clinical Drug Trials and Drug Trial Design","authors":"Julia Frost, Widening Engagement Patient Advisory Group, Jessica Mandizha, Steve Jones, Chantal van den Dungen, Lauren Asare, Catherine Pope","doi":"10.1111/hex.70260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Research about patient engagement for people with rare diseases has identified how the experiences of some members of the public are overlooked in relation to clinical trial design and trial participation. As part of a knowledge transfer partnership (KTP), the authors were granted access to patient insight reports about the needs of people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), to inform clinical trial design and marketing strategy. These were contrasted with data from qualitative interviews, informed by and collected from people with IPF and the clinical staff who recruit them to trials.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To identify patient and professional perspectives for IPF drug trials to create opportunities for innovation in patient engagement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Ethnography. Qualitative researcher embedded in a pharmaceutical organisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting and Participants</h3>\n \n <p>International patient insight reports to inform a clinical trial protocol (<i>n</i> = 1) and marketing strategy (<i>n</i> = 6), including the experiences of over 100 patients with IPF. In the United Kingdom, interviews with patients with IPF (<i>n</i> = 32) and the staff who support them clinically and recruit them to trials of new medicines (<i>n</i> = 19) at one specialist interstitial lung disease (ILD) centre.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Methodological practices inherent in inpatient insight reports ensured the perspectives of some people with IPF were overlooked. Interviews with a more marginalised population of people with IPF, and the staff who support them, identified that some found trial information confusing, trial practices frustrating and the opportunities to engage in trial design absent.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Current pharmaceutical practices of working with contract research organisations and patient organisations exclude the perspectives of patients with IPF who do not engage with either. Trial recruitment information needs to be tailored to the needs of individuals, and trial processes need to enable a wider group of patients to participate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>People with IPF want the opportunity to participate in drug trials and trial science. However, methodological rigour and deliberative practices are required to enable a wider group of patients to have a stake in the design and conduct of drug trials for rare diseases. The challenge now is for regulators to mandate such inclusive practices and for pharmaceutical organisations to adopt them.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>A Patient Advisory Group (PAG) comprising six people with IPF gave input on the research protocol and then on the scope and content of the ongoing research. Two patients from international patient organisations served as a Steering Group (SG). Members of these groups provided their interpretations of the study findings and gave insight on their experiences in clinical design and participation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70260","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Research about patient engagement for people with rare diseases has identified how the experiences of some members of the public are overlooked in relation to clinical trial design and trial participation. As part of a knowledge transfer partnership (KTP), the authors were granted access to patient insight reports about the needs of people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), to inform clinical trial design and marketing strategy. These were contrasted with data from qualitative interviews, informed by and collected from people with IPF and the clinical staff who recruit them to trials.
Objective
To identify patient and professional perspectives for IPF drug trials to create opportunities for innovation in patient engagement.
Design
Ethnography. Qualitative researcher embedded in a pharmaceutical organisation.
Setting and Participants
International patient insight reports to inform a clinical trial protocol (n = 1) and marketing strategy (n = 6), including the experiences of over 100 patients with IPF. In the United Kingdom, interviews with patients with IPF (n = 32) and the staff who support them clinically and recruit them to trials of new medicines (n = 19) at one specialist interstitial lung disease (ILD) centre.
Results
Methodological practices inherent in inpatient insight reports ensured the perspectives of some people with IPF were overlooked. Interviews with a more marginalised population of people with IPF, and the staff who support them, identified that some found trial information confusing, trial practices frustrating and the opportunities to engage in trial design absent.
Discussion
Current pharmaceutical practices of working with contract research organisations and patient organisations exclude the perspectives of patients with IPF who do not engage with either. Trial recruitment information needs to be tailored to the needs of individuals, and trial processes need to enable a wider group of patients to participate.
Conclusions
People with IPF want the opportunity to participate in drug trials and trial science. However, methodological rigour and deliberative practices are required to enable a wider group of patients to have a stake in the design and conduct of drug trials for rare diseases. The challenge now is for regulators to mandate such inclusive practices and for pharmaceutical organisations to adopt them.
Patient or Public Contribution
A Patient Advisory Group (PAG) comprising six people with IPF gave input on the research protocol and then on the scope and content of the ongoing research. Two patients from international patient organisations served as a Steering Group (SG). Members of these groups provided their interpretations of the study findings and gave insight on their experiences in clinical design and participation.
期刊介绍:
Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including:
• Person-centred care and quality improvement
• Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management
• Public perceptions of health services
• Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting
• Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation
• Empowerment and consumerism
• Patients'' role in safety and quality
• Patient and public role in health services research
• Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy
Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.