Source-Specific Mass Absorption Efficiencies of Char-EC and Soot-EC Improve Accuracy in Black Carbon Radiative Effect Estimation

IF 3.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Huikun Liu, Qiyuan Wang, Jie Tian, Jin Wang, Ruixia Tian, Yong Zhang, Qian Zhang, Yonggang Xue, Hongmei Xu, Weikang Ran, Hui Su, Yongming Han, Junji Cao
{"title":"Source-Specific Mass Absorption Efficiencies of Char-EC and Soot-EC Improve Accuracy in Black Carbon Radiative Effect Estimation","authors":"Huikun Liu,&nbsp;Qiyuan Wang,&nbsp;Jie Tian,&nbsp;Jin Wang,&nbsp;Ruixia Tian,&nbsp;Yong Zhang,&nbsp;Qian Zhang,&nbsp;Yonggang Xue,&nbsp;Hongmei Xu,&nbsp;Weikang Ran,&nbsp;Hui Su,&nbsp;Yongming Han,&nbsp;Junji Cao","doi":"10.1029/2024JD043079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Optical properties of elemental carbon (EC) are critical for climate modeling due to its strong light absorption. Elemental carbon consists of char-EC and soot-EC, which differ in mass absorption efficiency (MAE). However, the MAEs of these forms remain underexplored primarily due to the limited methods available for measurement, limiting the accuracy of EC climate impact assessments and leading distortions of EC radiative effect in the temporal and spatial distribution. In this study, we derived MAEs for char-EC and soot-EC using combined modeling methods based on observational data, revealing key differences. Soot-EC generally has higher MAEs than char-EC, except from biomass burning. Meteorological factors, such as relative humidity, also influence the MAEs of char-EC and soot-EC differently. The differences in sources and aging process lead to changes in the mass concentration and MAE of char-EC and soot-EC over time. Ignoring these differences can lead to discrepancies in the radiative effect from −9.1% to 18.7%. This study underscores the importance of considering the char-EC and soot-EC in accurate EC radiative effect estimates, and implies that optimizing the management of different black carbon emission sources would mitigate global warming to varying extents due to the divergence of the char/soot emission ratio and their MAE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD043079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optical properties of elemental carbon (EC) are critical for climate modeling due to its strong light absorption. Elemental carbon consists of char-EC and soot-EC, which differ in mass absorption efficiency (MAE). However, the MAEs of these forms remain underexplored primarily due to the limited methods available for measurement, limiting the accuracy of EC climate impact assessments and leading distortions of EC radiative effect in the temporal and spatial distribution. In this study, we derived MAEs for char-EC and soot-EC using combined modeling methods based on observational data, revealing key differences. Soot-EC generally has higher MAEs than char-EC, except from biomass burning. Meteorological factors, such as relative humidity, also influence the MAEs of char-EC and soot-EC differently. The differences in sources and aging process lead to changes in the mass concentration and MAE of char-EC and soot-EC over time. Ignoring these differences can lead to discrepancies in the radiative effect from −9.1% to 18.7%. This study underscores the importance of considering the char-EC and soot-EC in accurate EC radiative effect estimates, and implies that optimizing the management of different black carbon emission sources would mitigate global warming to varying extents due to the divergence of the char/soot emission ratio and their MAE.

Char-EC 和 Soot-EC 的特定源质量吸收效率提高了黑碳辐射效应估算的准确性
单质碳(EC)的光学特性对气候模拟至关重要,因为它具有很强的光吸收能力。单质碳分为炭质- ec和煤烟质- ec,两者的质量吸收效率不同。然而,这些形式的MAEs仍未得到充分探索,主要是由于可用的测量方法有限,限制了欧空体气候影响评估的准确性,并导致欧空体辐射效应在时空分布上的扭曲。在本研究中,我们利用基于观测数据的组合建模方法推导了炭- ec和煤烟- ec的MAEs,揭示了关键差异。除生物质燃烧外,煤烟- ec的MAEs通常高于炭- ec。相对湿度等气象因素对炭- ec和煤烟- ec的MAEs也有不同的影响。来源和老化过程的差异导致炭- ec和烟灰- ec的质量浓度和MAE随时间的变化。忽略这些差异会导致辐射效应从- 9.1%到18.7%的差异。本研究强调了在准确估算碳排放效应时考虑炭-碳排放和煤烟-碳排放的重要性,并指出由于炭/煤烟排放比及其MAE的差异,优化不同黑碳排放源的管理将在不同程度上缓解全球变暖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信