Yield and Stability of Three Tropical Forage Grasses Cultivated as Pure or Mixed Stands

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Larissa Fernanda Garcia-Carvalho, Guilhermo Francklin de Souza Congio, Gislaine Cristina Barro, Alex Marciano dos Santos Silva, Emanoella Karol Saraiva Otaviano, Caio Macret Gomes, Alexandre Fameli Mammana, André Fischer Sbrissia, Paulo Gonçalves Duchini, Rodrigo Amorim Barbosa, Carlos Tadeu dos Santos Dias, Sila Carneiro da Silva
{"title":"Yield and Stability of Three Tropical Forage Grasses Cultivated as Pure or Mixed Stands","authors":"Larissa Fernanda Garcia-Carvalho,&nbsp;Guilhermo Francklin de Souza Congio,&nbsp;Gislaine Cristina Barro,&nbsp;Alex Marciano dos Santos Silva,&nbsp;Emanoella Karol Saraiva Otaviano,&nbsp;Caio Macret Gomes,&nbsp;Alexandre Fameli Mammana,&nbsp;André Fischer Sbrissia,&nbsp;Paulo Gonçalves Duchini,&nbsp;Rodrigo Amorim Barbosa,&nbsp;Carlos Tadeu dos Santos Dias,&nbsp;Sila Carneiro da Silva","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multispecific pastures are considered more sustainable to animal production than monocultures. However, studies on mixtures of tropical grasses are underexplored. We aimed to assess whether a mixture of three contrasting growth strategies of perennial tropical forage grasses could outperform their respective monocultures in terms of forage yield and stability. The four treatments included three perennial tropical forage grasses: Andropogon gambagrass (AG; <i>Andropogon gayanus</i> cv. Planaltina), Massai guineagrass [MG; <i>Megathyrsus maximus</i> cv. Massai] and Piatã palisadegrass [PP; <i>Urochloa brizantha</i> cv. BRS Piatã], cultivated as monocultures and as a mixture of the three species. Treatments were randomly assigned to sixteen 180 m<sup>2</sup> plots and managed intermittently under manual harvest at pre- and post-harvest heights of 35 and 17.5 cm, respectively, for 2 years. The botanical composition of the mixture remained relatively stable, with a predominance of MG (68.9%), followed by PP (20.1%) and AG (6.8%). Annual forage yield varied between years (<i>p</i> = 0.0017) with a difference of 3974 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, but not according to treatments (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) with an average of 23,012 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>. No effect was observed for the intra-annual forage yield variance among treatments (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The association among PP, MG and AG in a mixture allows species to coexist with a relatively stable botanical composition, as well as forage yield and stability, similar to their monocultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12717","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multispecific pastures are considered more sustainable to animal production than monocultures. However, studies on mixtures of tropical grasses are underexplored. We aimed to assess whether a mixture of three contrasting growth strategies of perennial tropical forage grasses could outperform their respective monocultures in terms of forage yield and stability. The four treatments included three perennial tropical forage grasses: Andropogon gambagrass (AG; Andropogon gayanus cv. Planaltina), Massai guineagrass [MG; Megathyrsus maximus cv. Massai] and Piatã palisadegrass [PP; Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã], cultivated as monocultures and as a mixture of the three species. Treatments were randomly assigned to sixteen 180 m2 plots and managed intermittently under manual harvest at pre- and post-harvest heights of 35 and 17.5 cm, respectively, for 2 years. The botanical composition of the mixture remained relatively stable, with a predominance of MG (68.9%), followed by PP (20.1%) and AG (6.8%). Annual forage yield varied between years (p = 0.0017) with a difference of 3974 kg DM ha−1 year−1, but not according to treatments (p > 0.05) with an average of 23,012 kg DM ha−1 year−1. No effect was observed for the intra-annual forage yield variance among treatments (p > 0.05). The association among PP, MG and AG in a mixture allows species to coexist with a relatively stable botanical composition, as well as forage yield and stability, similar to their monocultures.

Abstract Image

三种热带牧草纯林和混交林的产量和稳定性
与单一种植相比,多种牧草被认为对动物生产更具可持续性。然而,有关热带牧草混合物的研究还不够深入。我们的目的是评估由三种生长策略截然不同的多年生热带牧草组成的混合物在牧草产量和稳定性方面是否优于其各自的单一种植。四种处理包括三种多年生热带牧草:AG;Andropogon gayanus cv. Planaltina)、Massai guineagrass [MG;Megathyrs maximus cv. Massai] 和 Piatã palisadegrass [PP;Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã]。各处理被随机分配到 16 块 180 平方米的地块上,并在人工收割下间歇管理,收割前和收割后的高度分别为 35 厘米和 17.5 厘米,为期两年。混合物的植物成分相对稳定,以 MG(68.9%)为主,其次是 PP(20.1%)和 AG(6.8%)。不同年份的年牧草产量不同(p = 0.0017),差异为 3974 千克 DM(公顷/年),但不同处理的差异不大(p > 0.05),平均为 23012 千克 DM(公顷/年)。不同处理间的年内牧草产量差异没有影响(p > 0.05)。PP、MG 和 AG 的混合种植可使物种共存,植物成分相对稳定,牧草产量和稳定性与单一种植相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信