{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Efgartigimod for Patients With Myasthenia Gravis in a Real-World Cohort of 77 Patients","authors":"Sijia Hao, Zhe Ruan, Rongjing Guo, Qingqing Wang, Xiaoxi Huang, Chao Sun, Huanhuan Li, Ting Gao, Yonglan Tang, Xiangqi Cao, Yu Liu, Zhuyi Li, Ting Chang","doi":"10.1111/cns.70391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Efgartigimod, a first-in-class neonatal Fc receptor antagonist, is approved for generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Its safety and efficacy across MG subtypes remain unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center real-world study (September 2023–July 2024) analyzed patients from an MG registry study in China. The primary efficacy outcome is the mean MG-ADL score changes from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12, analyzed via generalized estimating equations. Safety was assessed by adverse events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 77 patients (mean age 56.1 ± 15.2 years; 59.7% male), 76 completed at least one treatment cycle (20 completed 2 cycles; 1 completed 3 cycles). After efgartigimod treatment, MG-ADL scores decreased significantly by week 4 (mean difference −6.4, 95% CI −7.2 to −5.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001), sustaining through week 12 (−6.9, −7.8 to −6.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001). After the second cycle, MG-ADL scores at week 12 trended lower than the first cycle (mean difference: −0.8, 95% CI: −2.0 to −0.5, <i>p</i> = 0.061). Efficacy was consistent across MGFA classes and thymoma status. In refractory patients, efgartigimod reduced MG-ADL scores (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 3.9% (3/77).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Efgartigimod safely improved MG-ADL scores and reduced steroid use across MG subtypes, with sustained efficacy through multiple treatment cycles. These findings support its potential when conventional therapies fail.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":154,"journal":{"name":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cns.70391","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cns.70391","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
Efgartigimod, a first-in-class neonatal Fc receptor antagonist, is approved for generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Its safety and efficacy across MG subtypes remain unclear.
Methods
This single-center real-world study (September 2023–July 2024) analyzed patients from an MG registry study in China. The primary efficacy outcome is the mean MG-ADL score changes from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12, analyzed via generalized estimating equations. Safety was assessed by adverse events.
Results
Among 77 patients (mean age 56.1 ± 15.2 years; 59.7% male), 76 completed at least one treatment cycle (20 completed 2 cycles; 1 completed 3 cycles). After efgartigimod treatment, MG-ADL scores decreased significantly by week 4 (mean difference −6.4, 95% CI −7.2 to −5.6, p < 0.001), sustaining through week 12 (−6.9, −7.8 to −6.1, p < 0.001). After the second cycle, MG-ADL scores at week 12 trended lower than the first cycle (mean difference: −0.8, 95% CI: −2.0 to −0.5, p = 0.061). Efficacy was consistent across MGFA classes and thymoma status. In refractory patients, efgartigimod reduced MG-ADL scores (p < 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 3.9% (3/77).
Conclusion
Efgartigimod safely improved MG-ADL scores and reduced steroid use across MG subtypes, with sustained efficacy through multiple treatment cycles. These findings support its potential when conventional therapies fail.
期刊介绍:
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics provides a medium for rapid publication of original clinical, experimental, and translational research papers, timely reviews and reports of novel findings of therapeutic relevance to the central nervous system, as well as papers related to clinical pharmacology, drug development and novel methodologies for drug evaluation. The journal focuses on neurological and psychiatric diseases such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, and drug abuse.