Effects of an Iso-Osmotic Chloride-Free Solution With High Strong Ion Difference vs. Ringer's Lactate on Non-Lactate Metabolic Acidosis in Dogs

IF 2.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Roberto Rabozzi, Stefano Oricco
{"title":"Effects of an Iso-Osmotic Chloride-Free Solution With High Strong Ion Difference vs. Ringer's Lactate on Non-Lactate Metabolic Acidosis in Dogs","authors":"Roberto Rabozzi,&nbsp;Stefano Oricco","doi":"10.1111/jvim.70099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Metabolic acidosis is a common acid–base disorder in critically ill dogs, with fluid therapy being a key but debated treatment. Sodium bicarbonate's risks have spurred interest in safer alternatives such as sodium lactate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the efficacy of a chloride-free, high strong ion difference solution (H-SID) to Ringer's lactate (RL) for treating metabolic acidosis, hypothesizing the superiority of the H-SID solution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-six dogs with metabolic acidosis from two veterinary hospitals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective randomized multicenter study. Dogs were randomly assigned to receive either RL or H-SID at infusion rates of 4 or 10 mL/kg/h for 4 h, based on their volume status. H-SID was compounded with sodium (145 mmol/L), lactate (145 mmol/L), potassium (10 mmol/L), and aspartate (10 mmol/L) in sterile water for injection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The H-SID group showed a significant increase in BE-ecf (mmol/L) at infusion rates of 4 mL/kg/h (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and 10 mL/kg/h (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) when compared to the RL group. At the lower infusion rate, the median increase was 4.1 mmol/L (95% CI: 3.37, 6.71), whereas the RL group exhibited a variation of −0.1 (95% CI: −0.75, 2.2). At the higher infusion rate, the median increase was 11 mmol/L (95% CI: 8.16, 12.52) compared to the RL group variation of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.01, 2.96).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions and Clinical Importance</h3>\n \n <p>Our results indicate a significant alkalizing effect of the H-SID solution in dogs with non-lactic metabolic acidosis, demonstrating a superior effect compared to the RL solution without notable adverse effects.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.70099","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.70099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Metabolic acidosis is a common acid–base disorder in critically ill dogs, with fluid therapy being a key but debated treatment. Sodium bicarbonate's risks have spurred interest in safer alternatives such as sodium lactate.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy of a chloride-free, high strong ion difference solution (H-SID) to Ringer's lactate (RL) for treating metabolic acidosis, hypothesizing the superiority of the H-SID solution.

Animals

Forty-six dogs with metabolic acidosis from two veterinary hospitals.

Methods

Prospective randomized multicenter study. Dogs were randomly assigned to receive either RL or H-SID at infusion rates of 4 or 10 mL/kg/h for 4 h, based on their volume status. H-SID was compounded with sodium (145 mmol/L), lactate (145 mmol/L), potassium (10 mmol/L), and aspartate (10 mmol/L) in sterile water for injection.

Results

The H-SID group showed a significant increase in BE-ecf (mmol/L) at infusion rates of 4 mL/kg/h (p < 0.001) and 10 mL/kg/h (p < 0.001) when compared to the RL group. At the lower infusion rate, the median increase was 4.1 mmol/L (95% CI: 3.37, 6.71), whereas the RL group exhibited a variation of −0.1 (95% CI: −0.75, 2.2). At the higher infusion rate, the median increase was 11 mmol/L (95% CI: 8.16, 12.52) compared to the RL group variation of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.01, 2.96).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Our results indicate a significant alkalizing effect of the H-SID solution in dogs with non-lactic metabolic acidosis, demonstrating a superior effect compared to the RL solution without notable adverse effects.

Abstract Image

高强离子差等渗透无氯溶液与林格氏乳酸对犬非乳酸代谢性酸中毒的影响
背景:代谢性酸中毒是危重犬常见的酸碱失调,液体疗法是一种关键但有争议的治疗方法。碳酸氢钠的风险激发了人们对乳酸钠等更安全替代品的兴趣。目的比较无氯高强度离子差溶液(H-SID)与乳酸林格液(RL)治疗代谢性酸中毒的疗效,并推测H-SID溶液的优越性。两家兽医院46只代谢性酸中毒犬。方法前瞻性随机多中心研究。根据狗的体积状况,随机分配给它们以4或10 mL/kg/h的输注速率接受RL或h - sid,持续4小时。H-SID在无菌注射水中与钠(145 mmol/L)、乳酸(145 mmol/L)、钾(10 mmol/L)、天冬氨酸(10 mmol/L)复配。结果h - sid组在4 mL/kg/h (p < 0.001)和10 mL/kg/h (p < 0.001)时BE-ecf (mmol/L)较RL组显著升高。在较低的输注速率下,中位数增加为4.1 mmol/L (95% CI: 3.37, 6.71),而RL组的变化为−0.1 (95% CI:−0.75,2.2)。在较高的输注速率下,中位数增加为11 mmol/L (95% CI: 8.16, 12.52),而RL组的变化为1.3 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.01, 2.96)。结论及临床意义我们的研究结果表明,H-SID溶液对非乳酸代谢性酸中毒犬具有显著的碱化作用,与RL溶液相比,其效果优于RL溶液,且无明显不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
243
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信