Sometimes tame, sometimes wild: Weak continuity

IF 0.8 3区 数学 Q2 MATHEMATICS
Sam Sanders
{"title":"Sometimes tame, sometimes wild: Weak continuity","authors":"Sam Sanders","doi":"10.1112/blms.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Continuity is one of the most central notions in mathematics, physics and computer science. An interesting associated topic is <i>decompositions of continuity</i>, where continuity is shown to be equivalent to the combination of two or more <i>weak continuity</i> notions. In this paper, we study the logical properties of basic theorems about weakly continuous functions, like the supremum principle for the unit interval. We establish that most weak continuity notions are as tame as continuity, that is, the supremum principle can be proved from the relatively weak <i>arithmetical comprehension axiom</i> only. By contrast, for seven ‘wild’ weak continuity notions, the associated supremum principle yields rather strong axioms, including Feferman's projection principle, full second-order arithmetic or Kleene's associated quantifier <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <msup>\n <mo>∃</mo>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msup>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$(\\exists ^{3})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. Working in Kohlenbach's higher-order <i>Reverse Mathematics</i>, we also obtain elegant equivalences in various cases and obtain similar results for for example, Riemann integration. We believe these results to be of interest to mainstream mathematics as they cast new light on the distinction of ‘ordinary mathematics’ versus ‘foundations of mathematics/set theory’.</p>","PeriodicalId":55298,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society","volume":"57 4","pages":"1324-1346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1112/blms.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuity is one of the most central notions in mathematics, physics and computer science. An interesting associated topic is decompositions of continuity, where continuity is shown to be equivalent to the combination of two or more weak continuity notions. In this paper, we study the logical properties of basic theorems about weakly continuous functions, like the supremum principle for the unit interval. We establish that most weak continuity notions are as tame as continuity, that is, the supremum principle can be proved from the relatively weak arithmetical comprehension axiom only. By contrast, for seven ‘wild’ weak continuity notions, the associated supremum principle yields rather strong axioms, including Feferman's projection principle, full second-order arithmetic or Kleene's associated quantifier ( 3 ) $(\exists ^{3})$ . Working in Kohlenbach's higher-order Reverse Mathematics, we also obtain elegant equivalences in various cases and obtain similar results for for example, Riemann integration. We believe these results to be of interest to mainstream mathematics as they cast new light on the distinction of ‘ordinary mathematics’ versus ‘foundations of mathematics/set theory’.

时而温顺,时而狂野:弱连续性
连续性是数学、物理和计算机科学中最核心的概念之一。一个有趣的相关话题是连续性的分解,其中连续性被证明等同于两个或多个弱连续性概念的组合。本文研究了弱连续函数的基本定理的逻辑性质,如单位区间的上性原理。我们证明了大多数弱连续性概念都和连续性一样驯服,即只能从相对弱的算术理解公理来证明其最高原理。相比之下,对于七个“狂野”弱连续性概念,相关的最高原理产生了相当强的公理,包括费曼投影原理,全二阶算术或Kleene相关量词(∃3)$ (\exists ^{3})$。在Kohlenbach的高阶反向数学中,我们也得到了各种情况下的优雅等价,并得到了类似的结果,例如黎曼积分。我们相信这些结果会引起主流数学的兴趣,因为它们对“普通数学”与“数学基础/集合论”的区别有了新的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published by Oxford University Press prior to January 2017: http://blms.oxfordjournals.org/
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信