Diagnostic value of focal hyperechoic mesenteric fat sign as an indicator of the primary source of intra-abdominal pathology in patients with abdominal pain

IF 2.5 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Rasha Mahmoud, Hanan M. Alfifi, Mohamed Mossad, Naglaa Ezzat Abd Elmageed
{"title":"Diagnostic value of focal hyperechoic mesenteric fat sign as an indicator of the primary source of intra-abdominal pathology in patients with abdominal pain","authors":"Rasha Mahmoud,&nbsp;Hanan M. Alfifi,&nbsp;Mohamed Mossad,&nbsp;Naglaa Ezzat Abd Elmageed","doi":"10.1186/s43088-024-00593-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Most acute abdominal pain raises the suspension of infectious or inflammatory processes. The most obvious sign of acute intra-abdominal inflammation is frequently the identification of inflamed fat on the ultrasound. The study aimed to determine the specificity and sensitivity of focal hyperechogenic fat sign as a localizer of abdominal pathologies and to correlate findings with other imaging modalities as well as operative and pathological data.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-six patients with abdominal pain have been examined by ultrasound. In 32 patients (42.1%), focal hyperechogenic fat sign was the only detected sign by ultrasound; however, it was associated with other findings in 44 patients (57.9%). In 16 patients (21.1%), echogenic fat represents the primary source of pathology, while in 59 patients (77.6%), underlying pathologies were detected, &amp; the echogenic fat was a secondary finding. The diagnostic performance of hyperechogenic fat signs shown in the US in detecting the cause of abdominal pain was true-positive sign in 75 cases &amp; false positive in one case. Its sensitivity is high. It was about 98.7%.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our investigation demonstrated that focal hyperechoic mesenteric fat sign on abdominal ultrasound exhibited exceptionally high diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 100% and accuracy of 98.7% in detecting potential intra-abdominal pathologies. However, these findings necessitate validation through larger, multi-center prospective studies to establish broader clinical applicability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":481,"journal":{"name":"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bjbas.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43088-024-00593-8","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43088-024-00593-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Most acute abdominal pain raises the suspension of infectious or inflammatory processes. The most obvious sign of acute intra-abdominal inflammation is frequently the identification of inflamed fat on the ultrasound. The study aimed to determine the specificity and sensitivity of focal hyperechogenic fat sign as a localizer of abdominal pathologies and to correlate findings with other imaging modalities as well as operative and pathological data.

Results

Seventy-six patients with abdominal pain have been examined by ultrasound. In 32 patients (42.1%), focal hyperechogenic fat sign was the only detected sign by ultrasound; however, it was associated with other findings in 44 patients (57.9%). In 16 patients (21.1%), echogenic fat represents the primary source of pathology, while in 59 patients (77.6%), underlying pathologies were detected, & the echogenic fat was a secondary finding. The diagnostic performance of hyperechogenic fat signs shown in the US in detecting the cause of abdominal pain was true-positive sign in 75 cases & false positive in one case. Its sensitivity is high. It was about 98.7%.

Conclusion

Our investigation demonstrated that focal hyperechoic mesenteric fat sign on abdominal ultrasound exhibited exceptionally high diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 100% and accuracy of 98.7% in detecting potential intra-abdominal pathologies. However, these findings necessitate validation through larger, multi-center prospective studies to establish broader clinical applicability.

局灶性高回声肠系膜脂肪征作为腹痛患者腹内病理主要来源的诊断价值
背景:大多数急性腹痛引起感染或炎症过程的暂停。急性腹内炎症最明显的征象往往是在超声检查上发现发炎的脂肪。本研究旨在确定局灶性高回声脂肪征象作为腹部病变定位指标的特异性和敏感性,并将其与其他成像方式以及手术和病理数据相关联。结果对76例腹痛患者进行了超声检查。32例(42.1%)患者超声仅检出局灶性高回声脂肪征象;然而,在44例(57.9%)患者中,它与其他发现相关。16例(21.1%)患者回声性脂肪是主要病理来源,59例(77.6%)患者发现了潜在病理。回声脂肪是次要发现。美国对75例腹痛病因的高回声脂肪征象诊断为真阳性征象。其中一例为假阳性。它的灵敏度高。大约是98.7%。结论腹部超声显示局灶性高回声肠系膜脂肪征具有非常高的诊断价值,对腹部潜在病变的诊断灵敏度为100%,准确率为98.7%。然而,这些发现需要通过更大的、多中心的前瞻性研究来验证,以建立更广泛的临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences (BJBAS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal. This journal welcomes submissions of original research, literature reviews, and editorials in its respected fields of fundamental science, applied science (with a particular focus on the fields of applied nanotechnology and biotechnology), medical sciences, pharmaceutical sciences, and engineering. The multidisciplinary aspects of the journal encourage global collaboration between researchers in multiple fields and provide cross-disciplinary dissemination of findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信