From Compliance to Competitiveness: Unpacking the Impact of ESG Performance on Strategic Innovation and Market Dynamics

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Zeyu Xing;Jing Huang;Debin Fang
{"title":"From Compliance to Competitiveness: Unpacking the Impact of ESG Performance on Strategic Innovation and Market Dynamics","authors":"Zeyu Xing;Jing Huang;Debin Fang","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3551742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and corporate innovation strategies using an evolutionary game model. It clarifies how firms make strategic decisions under varying ESG benchmarks. The analysis shows that government subsidies help mitigate financial risks linked to exploratory innovation, encouraging firms to pursue competitive return innovation activities. As market competition intensifies, firms often shift toward more conservative innovation strategies—unless counterbalanced by significant profit opportunities. Notably, the findings reveal a “U-shaped” relationship between ESG performance and innovation: early ESG efforts may initially constrain innovation by reallocating resources to compliance, but stronger ESG engagement ultimately enhances innovation capabilities. By integrating stakeholder and institutional theories, this article illuminates how ESG practices influence innovation choices in different institutional contexts, advancing our theoretical understanding of sustainable innovation. These insights can inform corporate strategies and policy frameworks aimed at fostering long-term, sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"1297-1319"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10930601/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and corporate innovation strategies using an evolutionary game model. It clarifies how firms make strategic decisions under varying ESG benchmarks. The analysis shows that government subsidies help mitigate financial risks linked to exploratory innovation, encouraging firms to pursue competitive return innovation activities. As market competition intensifies, firms often shift toward more conservative innovation strategies—unless counterbalanced by significant profit opportunities. Notably, the findings reveal a “U-shaped” relationship between ESG performance and innovation: early ESG efforts may initially constrain innovation by reallocating resources to compliance, but stronger ESG engagement ultimately enhances innovation capabilities. By integrating stakeholder and institutional theories, this article illuminates how ESG practices influence innovation choices in different institutional contexts, advancing our theoretical understanding of sustainable innovation. These insights can inform corporate strategies and policy frameworks aimed at fostering long-term, sustainable development.
从合规到竞争力:解读环境、社会和公司治理绩效对战略创新和市场动态的影响
本文运用演化博弈模型研究了环境、社会和治理绩效与企业创新战略之间的关系。它阐明了企业如何在不同的ESG基准下做出战略决策。分析表明,政府补贴有助于降低与探索性创新相关的财务风险,鼓励企业追求竞争性回报的创新活动。随着市场竞争的加剧,企业通常会转向更保守的创新策略——除非有重大的利润机会作为平衡。值得注意的是,研究结果揭示了ESG绩效与创新之间的“u型”关系:早期的ESG努力最初可能会通过将资源重新分配给合规来限制创新,但更强的ESG参与度最终会提高创新能力。本文通过整合利益相关者理论和制度理论,阐述了ESG实践如何影响不同制度背景下的创新选择,从而提升了我们对可持续创新的理论认识。这些见解可以为旨在促进长期可持续发展的企业战略和政策框架提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信