A combination of Planetary Boundaries-LCA and the Doughnut to assess social impacts of systems

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Alexis Lalevée , Claire Lalevée
{"title":"A combination of Planetary Boundaries-LCA and the Doughnut to assess social impacts of systems","authors":"Alexis Lalevée ,&nbsp;Claire Lalevée","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Life Cycle Assessment is the most widely used method for assessing ecological impacts. This method only considers the ecological part of the sustainability, although social issues are becoming increasingly important. “Social life cycle assessment” (S-LCA) has been developed to fill this gap, but it is rarely used in practice. In fact, it is complex and there is a lack of clear guidelines to implement S-LCA, especially for localising (adapting to a context), the indicators, which often imply the involvement of various stakeholders.</div><div>Our hypothesis is that social indicators can be linked to ecological indicators through a mathematical correlation. Thus it allows the assessment of social impacts using these correlations. This article provide a method to do so, taking as input a Planetary-Boundaries LCA (PB-LCA) and achieving localisation by a downscaling of this PB-LCA. Our proposal is illustrated by a case study. The illustration highlights how to link and interpret the social and ecological dimensions, but also some weaknesses, such as the fact that it depends on PB-LCA, a method not yet widely spread, thus causing limitations of use by practitioners under real conditions. To remedy this, we make preliminary recommendations for practitioners wishing to use this method. Furthermore, the results must be interpreted with caution by practitioners: they are only a statistical representation. Practitioners should validate this mathematical approach with a field approach (interviews, etc.).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100679"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266597272500100X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment is the most widely used method for assessing ecological impacts. This method only considers the ecological part of the sustainability, although social issues are becoming increasingly important. “Social life cycle assessment” (S-LCA) has been developed to fill this gap, but it is rarely used in practice. In fact, it is complex and there is a lack of clear guidelines to implement S-LCA, especially for localising (adapting to a context), the indicators, which often imply the involvement of various stakeholders.
Our hypothesis is that social indicators can be linked to ecological indicators through a mathematical correlation. Thus it allows the assessment of social impacts using these correlations. This article provide a method to do so, taking as input a Planetary-Boundaries LCA (PB-LCA) and achieving localisation by a downscaling of this PB-LCA. Our proposal is illustrated by a case study. The illustration highlights how to link and interpret the social and ecological dimensions, but also some weaknesses, such as the fact that it depends on PB-LCA, a method not yet widely spread, thus causing limitations of use by practitioners under real conditions. To remedy this, we make preliminary recommendations for practitioners wishing to use this method. Furthermore, the results must be interpreted with caution by practitioners: they are only a statistical representation. Practitioners should validate this mathematical approach with a field approach (interviews, etc.).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信