César Merino-Soto , Sergio Dominguez-Lara , Lucas Marcelo Rodriguez , Guillermo M. Chans , Manuel Marti-Vilar
{"title":"Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the BFI-15p in university students from Argentina, Spain, and Peru","authors":"César Merino-Soto , Sergio Dominguez-Lara , Lucas Marcelo Rodriguez , Guillermo M. Chans , Manuel Marti-Vilar","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Big Five Inventory–15p (BFI-15p) is a relatively new 15-item version developed for Hispanic populations; however, evidence of its cross-cultural equivalence is lacking. This study examined the clarity of item phrasing (Study 1) and measurement invariance (Study 2) in university students from Argentina, Spain, and Peru. Two studies were conducted: one to assess perceived item clarity (<em>n</em> = 70) and another to evaluate the internal structure (<em>n</em> = 737), including dimensionality, reliability, and measurement invariance. In Study 1, consistent item clarity was observed across the three groups, though one item required minor revision. In Study 2, the five-factor structure showed a good fit in the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) provided slightly better results. However, differences between CFA and ESEM were not substantial, as cross-loadings were close to zero. Omega reliability varied across country groups but was predominantly acceptable for three-item subscales (approximately 0.60). Differential item functioning (DIF) by sex within each country was predominantly negligible. Measurement invariance was supported at the configural, metric, and scalar levels. The findings highlight the implications of measuring the Big Five model in university students across diverse cultural contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 104993"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825003063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Big Five Inventory–15p (BFI-15p) is a relatively new 15-item version developed for Hispanic populations; however, evidence of its cross-cultural equivalence is lacking. This study examined the clarity of item phrasing (Study 1) and measurement invariance (Study 2) in university students from Argentina, Spain, and Peru. Two studies were conducted: one to assess perceived item clarity (n = 70) and another to evaluate the internal structure (n = 737), including dimensionality, reliability, and measurement invariance. In Study 1, consistent item clarity was observed across the three groups, though one item required minor revision. In Study 2, the five-factor structure showed a good fit in the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) provided slightly better results. However, differences between CFA and ESEM were not substantial, as cross-loadings were close to zero. Omega reliability varied across country groups but was predominantly acceptable for three-item subscales (approximately 0.60). Differential item functioning (DIF) by sex within each country was predominantly negligible. Measurement invariance was supported at the configural, metric, and scalar levels. The findings highlight the implications of measuring the Big Five model in university students across diverse cultural contexts.
Big Five Inventory-15p (BFI-15p)是为西班牙裔人群开发的一个相对较新的15项版本;然而,缺乏跨文化对等性的证据。本研究考察了来自阿根廷、西班牙和秘鲁的大学生的项目措辞清晰度(研究1)和测量不变性(研究2)。进行了两项研究:一项评估感知项目清晰度(n = 70),另一项评估内部结构(n = 737),包括维度、信度和测量不变性。在研究1中,三组观察到一致的项目清晰度,尽管有一个项目需要轻微修改。在研究2中,验证性因子分析(CFA)对五因子结构的拟合效果较好,而探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)的拟合效果略好。然而,CFA和ESEM之间的差异并不大,因为交叉加载接近于零。欧米茄的信度因国家而异,但对于三项分量表(约0.60),欧米茄的信度主要是可以接受的。每个国家内按性别划分的差异项目功能基本上可以忽略不计。在配置、度量和标量级别上支持度量不变性。研究结果强调了在不同文化背景下衡量大五人格模式对大学生的影响。
期刊介绍:
Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.