Hongcheng Du , Kun Li , Jinhong Yang , Pengfei Hao , Xingshi Gu , Xian Yi , Zhiping Xu , Cunjing Lv
{"title":"Coupling of low elastic modulus with porosity makes extreme low ice adhesion strength possible","authors":"Hongcheng Du , Kun Li , Jinhong Yang , Pengfei Hao , Xingshi Gu , Xian Yi , Zhiping Xu , Cunjing Lv","doi":"10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anti-icing surfaces are vital for transportation and infrastructure. Low adhesion strength enables energy-efficient wind-driven or vibration-based ice-removal techniques beyond heating. A key challenge is to reduce the tangential adhesion strength of ice below 10 kPa, a goal hindered in practice by the high toughness of the ice-substrate interface. Even superhydrophobic materials with low surface energy struggle. Recent studies leverage low elastic moduli, lubricated surfaces, and minimal ice contact of porous substrates to reduce the adhesion strength. However, the rationale behind such an approach remains unclear, with no theories available for design purposes. In this study, we address this gap by establishing a solid mechanics framework based on fracture mechanics to model ice adhesion and inform anti-icing surface design. Here, we present an ice-solid interface fracture theory based on the Biot theory and a neo-Hookean framework, which accounts for substrate deformation and energy balance during ice debonding. Guided by this model, we optimized material properties of the substrate, including the porosity and pore size. Increasing porosity reduces the contact area and elastic modulus, while an optimized pore size prevents ice ingress and promotes interfacial cracking, lowering the interface toughness and energy cost of ice removal. The model prediction revises conventional scaling relations between the adhesion strength and the substrate modulus by modifying the exponent from 1/2 to 1, allowing the strength to reach even 0.1 kPa in theory. A durable, weather-resistant substrate with a tangential adhesion strength of 3 kPa is demonstrated in experiments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17331,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 106147"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022509625001231","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Anti-icing surfaces are vital for transportation and infrastructure. Low adhesion strength enables energy-efficient wind-driven or vibration-based ice-removal techniques beyond heating. A key challenge is to reduce the tangential adhesion strength of ice below 10 kPa, a goal hindered in practice by the high toughness of the ice-substrate interface. Even superhydrophobic materials with low surface energy struggle. Recent studies leverage low elastic moduli, lubricated surfaces, and minimal ice contact of porous substrates to reduce the adhesion strength. However, the rationale behind such an approach remains unclear, with no theories available for design purposes. In this study, we address this gap by establishing a solid mechanics framework based on fracture mechanics to model ice adhesion and inform anti-icing surface design. Here, we present an ice-solid interface fracture theory based on the Biot theory and a neo-Hookean framework, which accounts for substrate deformation and energy balance during ice debonding. Guided by this model, we optimized material properties of the substrate, including the porosity and pore size. Increasing porosity reduces the contact area and elastic modulus, while an optimized pore size prevents ice ingress and promotes interfacial cracking, lowering the interface toughness and energy cost of ice removal. The model prediction revises conventional scaling relations between the adhesion strength and the substrate modulus by modifying the exponent from 1/2 to 1, allowing the strength to reach even 0.1 kPa in theory. A durable, weather-resistant substrate with a tangential adhesion strength of 3 kPa is demonstrated in experiments.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids is to publish research of the highest quality and of lasting significance on the mechanics of solids. The scope is broad, from fundamental concepts in mechanics to the analysis of novel phenomena and applications. Solids are interpreted broadly to include both hard and soft materials as well as natural and synthetic structures. The approach can be theoretical, experimental or computational.This research activity sits within engineering science and the allied areas of applied mathematics, materials science, bio-mechanics, applied physics, and geophysics.
The Journal was founded in 1952 by Rodney Hill, who was its Editor-in-Chief until 1968. The topics of interest to the Journal evolve with developments in the subject but its basic ethos remains the same: to publish research of the highest quality relating to the mechanics of solids. Thus, emphasis is placed on the development of fundamental concepts of mechanics and novel applications of these concepts based on theoretical, experimental or computational approaches, drawing upon the various branches of engineering science and the allied areas within applied mathematics, materials science, structural engineering, applied physics, and geophysics.
The main purpose of the Journal is to foster scientific understanding of the processes of deformation and mechanical failure of all solid materials, both technological and natural, and the connections between these processes and their underlying physical mechanisms. In this sense, the content of the Journal should reflect the current state of the discipline in analysis, experimental observation, and numerical simulation. In the interest of achieving this goal, authors are encouraged to consider the significance of their contributions for the field of mechanics and the implications of their results, in addition to describing the details of their work.