Efficacy of a culturally tailored intervention on perceived stigma among women living with HIV/AIDS in China: A randomized clinical trial

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zhongfang Yang , Shuyu Han , Xiang Qi , Jing Wang , Zhijing Xu , Weiyu Mao , Yaguang Zheng , Yue Zhang , Bei Wu , Yan Hu
{"title":"Efficacy of a culturally tailored intervention on perceived stigma among women living with HIV/AIDS in China: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Zhongfang Yang ,&nbsp;Shuyu Han ,&nbsp;Xiang Qi ,&nbsp;Jing Wang ,&nbsp;Zhijing Xu ,&nbsp;Weiyu Mao ,&nbsp;Yaguang Zheng ,&nbsp;Yue Zhang ,&nbsp;Bei Wu ,&nbsp;Yan Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite evidence supporting the efficacy of culturally tailored interventions in reducing stigma, such approaches are lacking for women living with HIV/AIDS (WLWHAs) in China. We conducted this study to determine the efficacy of the culturally tailored Helping Overcome Perceived Stigma (HOPES) intervention in reducing perceived stigma among WLWHAs in China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-blinded, two-arm parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted from 2023 to 2024 in South and Southwest China. WLWHAs from four hospitals were assigned using a WeChat-embedded randomization application to the control group (usual care) or the HOPES intervention. Data analysts remained blinded. Interventions were conducted virtually using Leave No One Behind (LNOB) platform for 3 months. The primary outcome, perceived stigma score, was assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention and at 3 months post-intervention using 7 items from the HIV/AIDS Stigma Experience Questionnaire (HASEQ), with data analyzed through repeated measures analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 136 WLWHAs screened, we randomized 101 WLWHAs (50 HOPES; 51 controls). The HOPES group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in perceived stigma scores immediately after the intervention (−3.86 points, 95 % CI: 5.34 to −2.38, P &lt; .001) and at three months post-intervention (−5.83 points, 95 % CI: 7.20 to −4.47, P &lt; .001) compared to the control group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings demonstrate HOPES' efficacy in reducing perceived stigma in WLWHA. However, the clinical significance of these changes needs further investigation. Future research should focus on defining meaningful patient-reported thresholds, assessing long-term impact, and optimizing delivery methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"374 ","pages":"Article 118072"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite evidence supporting the efficacy of culturally tailored interventions in reducing stigma, such approaches are lacking for women living with HIV/AIDS (WLWHAs) in China. We conducted this study to determine the efficacy of the culturally tailored Helping Overcome Perceived Stigma (HOPES) intervention in reducing perceived stigma among WLWHAs in China.

Methods

A single-blinded, two-arm parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted from 2023 to 2024 in South and Southwest China. WLWHAs from four hospitals were assigned using a WeChat-embedded randomization application to the control group (usual care) or the HOPES intervention. Data analysts remained blinded. Interventions were conducted virtually using Leave No One Behind (LNOB) platform for 3 months. The primary outcome, perceived stigma score, was assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention and at 3 months post-intervention using 7 items from the HIV/AIDS Stigma Experience Questionnaire (HASEQ), with data analyzed through repeated measures analysis.

Results

Of 136 WLWHAs screened, we randomized 101 WLWHAs (50 HOPES; 51 controls). The HOPES group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in perceived stigma scores immediately after the intervention (−3.86 points, 95 % CI: 5.34 to −2.38, P < .001) and at three months post-intervention (−5.83 points, 95 % CI: 7.20 to −4.47, P < .001) compared to the control group.

Conclusion

The findings demonstrate HOPES' efficacy in reducing perceived stigma in WLWHA. However, the clinical significance of these changes needs further investigation. Future research should focus on defining meaningful patient-reported thresholds, assessing long-term impact, and optimizing delivery methods.
一项针对中国女性艾滋病毒携带者/艾滋病患者的污名化干预的效果:一项随机临床试验
背景:尽管有证据支持针对文化的干预措施在减少耻辱感方面的有效性,但在中国,这种方法对感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病的妇女(WLWHAs)缺乏。我们进行了这项研究,以确定文化定制的帮助克服耻辱感(hope)干预在减少中国wlwha的耻辱感方面的效果。方法于2023 - 2024年在中国南方和西南地区进行单盲、双平行组随机临床试验。使用嵌入微信的随机化应用程序将来自四家医院的wlwha分配到对照组(常规护理)或hope干预组。数据分析师仍然是盲目的。使用“不让任何人掉队”(Leave No One Behind, LNOB)平台进行干预,为期3个月。在基线、干预后和干预后3个月,使用HIV/AIDS污名体验问卷(HASEQ)中的7个项目评估主要结局——感知污名得分,并通过重复测量分析对数据进行分析。结果在筛选的136例WLWHAs中,我们随机选取了101例(50例;51控制)。霍普组在干预后立即显示出具有统计学意义的耻辱感得分下降(- 3.86分,95% CI: 5.34至- 2.38,P <;.001)和干预后3个月(- 5.83点,95% CI: 7.20至- 4.47,P <;.001)。结论研究结果表明,hope在减少WLWHA患者的耻辱感方面具有疗效。然而,这些变化的临床意义有待进一步研究。未来的研究应侧重于定义有意义的患者报告阈值,评估长期影响,并优化给药方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信