Effectiveness of a Structured Self-Management Intervention to Improve Quality of Life in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AMPOC Study)

Q4 Medicine
Maite López Luque , Marta Chuecos Molina , Guadalupe Ortega Cuelva , M. Jesús Vázquez López , Francisco Orfila Pernas , Nina Granel Giménez , Esther Ruiz Rodríguez , M. Ángeles Santos Santos , Adrià Almazor Sirvent , Antonio Vallejo Domingo , Toni López Ruiz , Purificación Jordana Ferrando
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Structured Self-Management Intervention to Improve Quality of Life in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AMPOC Study)","authors":"Maite López Luque ,&nbsp;Marta Chuecos Molina ,&nbsp;Guadalupe Ortega Cuelva ,&nbsp;M. Jesús Vázquez López ,&nbsp;Francisco Orfila Pernas ,&nbsp;Nina Granel Giménez ,&nbsp;Esther Ruiz Rodríguez ,&nbsp;M. Ángeles Santos Santos ,&nbsp;Adrià Almazor Sirvent ,&nbsp;Antonio Vallejo Domingo ,&nbsp;Toni López Ruiz ,&nbsp;Purificación Jordana Ferrando","doi":"10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a structured self-management program in patients with moderate–severe COPD followed up for 12 months, in improving quality of life, dyspnea, inhaler adherence, anxiety, and depression, compared to standard practice.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>This was a multicenter randomized clinical trial involving 115 patients, 59 in the intervention group and 56 in the control group. Participants from 16 primary care centers in Barcelona, Spain, were allocated consecutively and in a blinded manner to the intervention and control groups in stages. Professionals received training in behavioral change techniques. The intervention consisted of four 20-min sessions conducted at 14-day intervals, covering topics such as COPD knowledge, smoking, inhaler use, physical activity, nutrition, breathing, exacerbations, vaccinations, work and environmental conditions, leisure, sexuality, daily activities, anxiety, and depression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 102 patients completed the study, 50 in the intervention group and 52 in the control group. Differences between the intervention and control groups in quality of life, dyspnea, inhaler adherence, smoking, anxiety, and depression were not significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients with moderate–severe COPD, a structured self-management intervention in primary care is not more effective than standard care in improving quality of life, dyspnea, inhaler adherence, anxiety, and depression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34317,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Archives","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S265966362500030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a structured self-management program in patients with moderate–severe COPD followed up for 12 months, in improving quality of life, dyspnea, inhaler adherence, anxiety, and depression, compared to standard practice.

Material and methods

This was a multicenter randomized clinical trial involving 115 patients, 59 in the intervention group and 56 in the control group. Participants from 16 primary care centers in Barcelona, Spain, were allocated consecutively and in a blinded manner to the intervention and control groups in stages. Professionals received training in behavioral change techniques. The intervention consisted of four 20-min sessions conducted at 14-day intervals, covering topics such as COPD knowledge, smoking, inhaler use, physical activity, nutrition, breathing, exacerbations, vaccinations, work and environmental conditions, leisure, sexuality, daily activities, anxiety, and depression.

Results

A total of 102 patients completed the study, 50 in the intervention group and 52 in the control group. Differences between the intervention and control groups in quality of life, dyspnea, inhaler adherence, smoking, anxiety, and depression were not significant.

Conclusion

In patients with moderate–severe COPD, a structured self-management intervention in primary care is not more effective than standard care in improving quality of life, dyspnea, inhaler adherence, anxiety, and depression.

Abstract Image

结构化自我管理干预改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者生活质量的有效性(AMPOC研究)
本研究旨在比较结构化自我管理计划在中重度COPD患者中随访12个月的有效性,与标准实践相比,在改善生活质量、呼吸困难、吸入器依从性、焦虑和抑郁方面。材料与方法这是一项多中心随机临床试验,涉及115例患者,干预组59例,对照组56例。来自西班牙巴塞罗那16个初级保健中心的参与者以盲法连续分配到干预组和对照组。专业人员接受了行为改变技巧方面的培训。干预包括四个20分钟的疗程,每隔14天进行一次,涵盖COPD知识、吸烟、吸入器使用、身体活动、营养、呼吸、恶化、疫苗接种、工作和环境条件、休闲、性、日常活动、焦虑和抑郁等主题。结果102例患者完成研究,干预组50例,对照组52例。干预组与对照组在生活质量、呼吸困难、吸入器依从性、吸烟、焦虑和抑郁方面的差异无统计学意义。结论:在中重度COPD患者中,初级保健中的结构化自我管理干预在改善生活质量、呼吸困难、吸入器依从性、焦虑和抑郁方面并不比标准护理更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Archives
Open Respiratory Archives Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信