Study on the effect of embodiment on Lexicosemantic Aging: Evidence based on the processing of Chinese action verbs

Meng Jiang , Qi Luo , Xia Wang , Zhenling Tian
{"title":"Study on the effect of embodiment on Lexicosemantic Aging: Evidence based on the processing of Chinese action verbs","authors":"Meng Jiang ,&nbsp;Qi Luo ,&nbsp;Xia Wang ,&nbsp;Zhenling Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.laheal.2025.100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have extensively found that language is embodied and language undergoes aging, yet little attention has been paid to correlate the two issues. To address this gap, the present study put forward the Embodiment Effect on Lexicosemantic Aging (EELA) Hypothesis, which posits that words with stronger magnitude of embodiment are less susceptible to aging, whereas words with weaker magnitude of embodiment exhibit greater aging effects. To test this hypothesis, the present study employed three categories of action verbs, namely, the <em>limb</em> action verb, the <em>face</em> action verb, and the <em>natural-change</em> action verb, which were graded in embodiment, and recruited three age groups of adults (i.e., young, middle-aged and elderly ones) to perform a semantic categorization task. The results revealed a systematic processing hierarchy, with action verbs with the largest embodiment magnitude (<em>limb</em> action verbs) underwent the least aging, action verbs with the second largest embodiment magnitude (<em>face</em> action verbs) underwent more aging, action verbs with the smallest embodiment magnitude (<em>natural-change</em> action verbs) underwent the largest aging. These findings provide support for the EELA Hypothesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100865,"journal":{"name":"Language and Health","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949903825000041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have extensively found that language is embodied and language undergoes aging, yet little attention has been paid to correlate the two issues. To address this gap, the present study put forward the Embodiment Effect on Lexicosemantic Aging (EELA) Hypothesis, which posits that words with stronger magnitude of embodiment are less susceptible to aging, whereas words with weaker magnitude of embodiment exhibit greater aging effects. To test this hypothesis, the present study employed three categories of action verbs, namely, the limb action verb, the face action verb, and the natural-change action verb, which were graded in embodiment, and recruited three age groups of adults (i.e., young, middle-aged and elderly ones) to perform a semantic categorization task. The results revealed a systematic processing hierarchy, with action verbs with the largest embodiment magnitude (limb action verbs) underwent the least aging, action verbs with the second largest embodiment magnitude (face action verbs) underwent more aging, action verbs with the smallest embodiment magnitude (natural-change action verbs) underwent the largest aging. These findings provide support for the EELA Hypothesis.
体现对词汇语义老化的影响研究:基于汉语动作动词加工的证据
以往的研究广泛发现语言的具身性和语言的老化性,但很少关注两者之间的关联。为了弥补这一差距,本研究提出了“词汇语义老化的体现效应”假说,即体现程度越强的词汇对老化的影响越小,而体现程度越弱的词汇对老化的影响越大。为了验证这一假设,本研究采用了肢体动作动词、面部动作动词和自然变化动作动词这三种动作动词,并在体现上进行了分级,并招募了三个年龄组的成年人(青年、中年和老年人)进行语义分类任务。结果显示,体现量最大的动作动词(肢体动作动词)的老化程度最小,体现量第二大的动作动词(面部动作动词)的老化程度更高,体现量最小的动作动词(自然变化动作动词)的老化程度最大。这些发现为EELA假说提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信