The role of governance in large-scale mining sector in Latin America

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Manuel A. Zambrano-Monserrate
{"title":"The role of governance in large-scale mining sector in Latin America","authors":"Manuel A. Zambrano-Monserrate","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a surge in global raw material demand since 2021, suggesting the onset of a potential minerals and oil supercycle. This rebound has been driven by post-pandemic economic growth, infrastructure expansion, the transition to renewable energy, and sector electrification. These dynamics offer an opportunity to improve mineral resource governance, as highlighted by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), which stresses the role of institutional design. In this context, State Mining Enterprises (SMEs) have gained renewed importance, as several countries promote them to strengthen state ownership, foster innovation, and support public investment. While state-owned enterprises dominate the oil, gas, and mining sectors globally, they often face challenges related to inefficiency and corruption. This paper analyzes the governance of SMEs in Chile, Ecuador, and Bolivia, focusing on differences in sustainability practices, transparency, and their capacity to promote innovation and value creation. In Chile, CODELCO and ENAMI demonstrate a stronger institutional framework and lead innovation efforts within the region. In contrast, Bolivia’s COMIBOL and YLB struggle with operational implementation and lack effective oversight mechanisms. Ecuador’s ENAMI EP is shifting its strategy toward diversification beyond mining, particularly in energy and infrastructure. However, sustainability and transparency standards remain weak across the three countries, with CODELCO standing out as the only enterprise consistently aligning with international best practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 104071"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000875","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a surge in global raw material demand since 2021, suggesting the onset of a potential minerals and oil supercycle. This rebound has been driven by post-pandemic economic growth, infrastructure expansion, the transition to renewable energy, and sector electrification. These dynamics offer an opportunity to improve mineral resource governance, as highlighted by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), which stresses the role of institutional design. In this context, State Mining Enterprises (SMEs) have gained renewed importance, as several countries promote them to strengthen state ownership, foster innovation, and support public investment. While state-owned enterprises dominate the oil, gas, and mining sectors globally, they often face challenges related to inefficiency and corruption. This paper analyzes the governance of SMEs in Chile, Ecuador, and Bolivia, focusing on differences in sustainability practices, transparency, and their capacity to promote innovation and value creation. In Chile, CODELCO and ENAMI demonstrate a stronger institutional framework and lead innovation efforts within the region. In contrast, Bolivia’s COMIBOL and YLB struggle with operational implementation and lack effective oversight mechanisms. Ecuador’s ENAMI EP is shifting its strategy toward diversification beyond mining, particularly in energy and infrastructure. However, sustainability and transparency standards remain weak across the three countries, with CODELCO standing out as the only enterprise consistently aligning with international best practices.
治理在拉丁美洲大型采矿部门中的作用
自2021年以来,新冠肺炎疫情引发全球原材料需求激增,这表明一个潜在的矿产和石油超级周期开始了。大流行后的经济增长、基础设施扩建、向可再生能源过渡以及行业电气化推动了这一反弹。这些动态提供了改善矿物资源管理的机会,正如拉丁美洲和加勒比经济委员会(拉加经委会)所强调的那样,该委员会强调体制设计的作用。在这种背景下,国有矿业企业(sme)重新获得了重要性,因为一些国家推动它们加强国有所有权,促进创新和支持公共投资。尽管国有企业在全球石油、天然气和矿业领域占据主导地位,但它们经常面临效率低下和腐败的挑战。本文分析了智利、厄瓜多尔和玻利维亚中小企业的治理,重点关注可持续性实践、透明度及其促进创新和价值创造能力的差异。在智利,CODELCO和ENAMI展示了更强大的体制框架,并在该地区引领创新努力。相比之下,玻利维亚的COMIBOL和YLB在业务执行方面挣扎,缺乏有效的监督机制。厄瓜多尔ENAMI EP正在将其战略转向矿业以外的多元化,特别是在能源和基础设施领域。然而,这三个国家的可持续性和透明度标准仍然很弱,CODELCO是唯一一家始终与国际最佳实践保持一致的企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信