Practical application of artificial intelligence for ecological image analysis: Trialling different levels of taxonomic classification to promote convolutional neural network performance

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Amelia E.H. Bridges , Eleanor Cross , Kyran P. Graves , Nils Piechaud , Antony Raymont , Kerry L. Howell
{"title":"Practical application of artificial intelligence for ecological image analysis: Trialling different levels of taxonomic classification to promote convolutional neural network performance","authors":"Amelia E.H. Bridges ,&nbsp;Eleanor Cross ,&nbsp;Kyran P. Graves ,&nbsp;Nils Piechaud ,&nbsp;Antony Raymont ,&nbsp;Kerry L. Howell","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), into ecological research presents new opportunities for the automated analysis of image-based data. This study explores the practical application of CNNs for ecological image analysis by trialling annotation to different levels of taxonomic classification to determine their impact on model performance. We systematically compare various annotation strategies, evaluating their effects on the accuracy of CNNs in ecological contexts; as well as considering the feasibility of manually annotating training data to different levels. We demonstrate that variation in annotations groupings (animal, phylum or morphology) has little impact on model performance, despite large differences in class numbers. Consequently, the decision for annotators should hinge on whether to invest effort in detailed annotation at the beginning of a project or to perform finer sorting of model predictions at the end. These findings provide practical guidance for optimizing the workflow in AI-driven ecological studies, offering flexibility without compromising model performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 103146"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954125001554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), into ecological research presents new opportunities for the automated analysis of image-based data. This study explores the practical application of CNNs for ecological image analysis by trialling annotation to different levels of taxonomic classification to determine their impact on model performance. We systematically compare various annotation strategies, evaluating their effects on the accuracy of CNNs in ecological contexts; as well as considering the feasibility of manually annotating training data to different levels. We demonstrate that variation in annotations groupings (animal, phylum or morphology) has little impact on model performance, despite large differences in class numbers. Consequently, the decision for annotators should hinge on whether to invest effort in detailed annotation at the beginning of a project or to perform finer sorting of model predictions at the end. These findings provide practical guidance for optimizing the workflow in AI-driven ecological studies, offering flexibility without compromising model performance.

Abstract Image

人工智能在生态图像分析中的实际应用:尝试不同层次的分类分类以提高卷积神经网络的性能
人工智能(AI),特别是卷积神经网络(cnn)与生态研究的整合为基于图像的数据的自动分析提供了新的机会。本研究探索了cnn在生态图像分析中的实际应用,对不同层次的分类分类进行了标注试验,以确定其对模型性能的影响。我们系统地比较了各种标注策略,评估了它们对生态环境下cnn准确性的影响;同时也考虑了手工标注训练数据到不同层次的可行性。我们证明了注释分组(动物、门或形态)的变化对模型性能的影响很小,尽管分类数量存在很大差异。因此,注释者的决定应该取决于是在项目开始时投入精力进行详细的注释,还是在项目结束时对模型预测进行更精细的排序。这些发现为优化人工智能驱动的生态研究中的工作流程提供了实用指导,在不影响模型性能的情况下提供了灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Informatics
Ecological Informatics 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
346
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change. The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信