Gengyao Wei, Fraser Birks , Daniel Bax, David Roper, Matt Meek, Ruth Cameron, Serena Best
{"title":"Design and evaluation of an auxetic biaxial substrate straining device for tissue engineering applications","authors":"Gengyao Wei, Fraser Birks , Daniel Bax, David Roper, Matt Meek, Ruth Cameron, Serena Best","doi":"10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mechanical forces play a critical role in cellular behaviour, yet devising systems capable of applying multiaxial strain to three-dimensional (3D) tissue engineering substrates remains challenging. This study introduces an innovative approach using 3D-printed auxetic re-entrant honeycomb meshes to convert uniaxial tension into biaxial straining of cell-laden collagen hydrogel substrates by utilising the unconventional negative Poisson's ratio. Key findings demonstrate that polypropylene (PP) meshes exhibited enhanced compliance and ductility compared to conventional poly-<em><span>l</span></em>-lactide (PLA) alternatives, making them particularly suitable for this application. Across all auxetic designs, the tensile moduli of the PP meshes were approximately 6 times lower, and their ultimate tensile strains remained at 0.66—approximately 17 times higher than that of PLA meshes. Critically, when human dermal fibroblasts were cultured on the strained collagen gels, their aspect ratio increased by 59 % while maintaining random alignment, providing proof of concept for true biaxial mechanical stimulation. This approach offers a versatile and accessible tool for advancing research in mechanobiology and tissue engineering by enabling the exploration of cellular responses to physiologically relevant mechanical environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51111,"journal":{"name":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 214313"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772950825001402","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mechanical forces play a critical role in cellular behaviour, yet devising systems capable of applying multiaxial strain to three-dimensional (3D) tissue engineering substrates remains challenging. This study introduces an innovative approach using 3D-printed auxetic re-entrant honeycomb meshes to convert uniaxial tension into biaxial straining of cell-laden collagen hydrogel substrates by utilising the unconventional negative Poisson's ratio. Key findings demonstrate that polypropylene (PP) meshes exhibited enhanced compliance and ductility compared to conventional poly-l-lactide (PLA) alternatives, making them particularly suitable for this application. Across all auxetic designs, the tensile moduli of the PP meshes were approximately 6 times lower, and their ultimate tensile strains remained at 0.66—approximately 17 times higher than that of PLA meshes. Critically, when human dermal fibroblasts were cultured on the strained collagen gels, their aspect ratio increased by 59 % while maintaining random alignment, providing proof of concept for true biaxial mechanical stimulation. This approach offers a versatile and accessible tool for advancing research in mechanobiology and tissue engineering by enabling the exploration of cellular responses to physiologically relevant mechanical environments.
期刊介绍:
Biomaterials Advances, previously known as Materials Science and Engineering: C-Materials for Biological Applications (P-ISSN: 0928-4931, E-ISSN: 1873-0191). Includes topics at the interface of the biomedical sciences and materials engineering. These topics include:
• Bioinspired and biomimetic materials for medical applications
• Materials of biological origin for medical applications
• Materials for "active" medical applications
• Self-assembling and self-healing materials for medical applications
• "Smart" (i.e., stimulus-response) materials for medical applications
• Ceramic, metallic, polymeric, and composite materials for medical applications
• Materials for in vivo sensing
• Materials for in vivo imaging
• Materials for delivery of pharmacologic agents and vaccines
• Novel approaches for characterizing and modeling materials for medical applications
Manuscripts on biological topics without a materials science component, or manuscripts on materials science without biological applications, will not be considered for publication in Materials Science and Engineering C. New submissions are first assessed for language, scope and originality (plagiarism check) and can be desk rejected before review if they need English language improvements, are out of scope or present excessive duplication with published sources.
Biomaterials Advances sits within Elsevier''s biomaterials science portfolio alongside Biomaterials, Materials Today Bio and Biomaterials and Biosystems. As part of the broader Materials Today family, Biomaterials Advances offers authors rigorous peer review, rapid decisions, and high visibility. We look forward to receiving your submissions!