A novel open-vascular single-branched stent graft in total arch repair of type a aortic dissection one-year results of a prospective multicenter randomized controlled study

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jiawei Gu , Weize Zhang , Le Kang , Yongxin Sun, Jun Li, Yulin Wang, Qiang Ji, Shuyang Lu, Junyu Zhai, Ben Huang, Kai Zhu, Dingqian Liu, Hao Lai, Chunsheng Wang
{"title":"A novel open-vascular single-branched stent graft in total arch repair of type a aortic dissection one-year results of a prospective multicenter randomized controlled study","authors":"Jiawei Gu ,&nbsp;Weize Zhang ,&nbsp;Le Kang ,&nbsp;Yongxin Sun,&nbsp;Jun Li,&nbsp;Yulin Wang,&nbsp;Qiang Ji,&nbsp;Shuyang Lu,&nbsp;Junyu Zhai,&nbsp;Ben Huang,&nbsp;Kai Zhu,&nbsp;Dingqian Liu,&nbsp;Hao Lai,&nbsp;Chunsheng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening condition requiring timely surgery. Modifications in TAAD arch reconstruction are needed to improve surgical manipulation and reduce complications. This study evaluates a novel single-branched stent graft for arch reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and results</h3><div>We randomly enrolled 156 patients with acute Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) from 8 Chinese hospitals to receive either the Fontus branched stent graft (75 patients) or the Cronus straight stent graft (81 patients) for frozen elephant trunk (FET) surgery. In the analysis of the primary endpoint, 30-day mortality was 10.7 % (8/75) in the Fontus group and 11.1 % (9/81) in the Cronus group, with a mortality difference of 0.44 % (95 % CI, −9.34 % to 10.22 %; non-inferiority threshold −14 %). At 12 months, all-cause mortality was 16.0 % in the Fontus group compared to 13.6 % in the Cronus group (<em>p</em> = 0.670). The rates of false lumen (FL) obliteration and freedom from secondary interventions for target lesions were 90.5 % and 98.4 % in the Fontus group, and 92.7 % and 98.6 % in the Cronus group. Instrumental adverse events occurred in 5 patients in the Fontus group, while no such events occurred in the Cronus group (<em>p</em> = 0.024). At 1 month, dissection-associated mortality was 10.7 % (8/75) in the Fontus group and 11.1 % (9/81) in the Cronus group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This first randomized clinical study on FET repair for acute TAAD shows that the Fontus single-branched stent graft is safe, effective and non-inferior to the conventional straight stent graft in 1-year survival and adverse event rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"431 ","pages":"Article 133268"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325003110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening condition requiring timely surgery. Modifications in TAAD arch reconstruction are needed to improve surgical manipulation and reduce complications. This study evaluates a novel single-branched stent graft for arch reconstruction.

Methods and results

We randomly enrolled 156 patients with acute Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) from 8 Chinese hospitals to receive either the Fontus branched stent graft (75 patients) or the Cronus straight stent graft (81 patients) for frozen elephant trunk (FET) surgery. In the analysis of the primary endpoint, 30-day mortality was 10.7 % (8/75) in the Fontus group and 11.1 % (9/81) in the Cronus group, with a mortality difference of 0.44 % (95 % CI, −9.34 % to 10.22 %; non-inferiority threshold −14 %). At 12 months, all-cause mortality was 16.0 % in the Fontus group compared to 13.6 % in the Cronus group (p = 0.670). The rates of false lumen (FL) obliteration and freedom from secondary interventions for target lesions were 90.5 % and 98.4 % in the Fontus group, and 92.7 % and 98.6 % in the Cronus group. Instrumental adverse events occurred in 5 patients in the Fontus group, while no such events occurred in the Cronus group (p = 0.024). At 1 month, dissection-associated mortality was 10.7 % (8/75) in the Fontus group and 11.1 % (9/81) in the Cronus group.

Conclusions

This first randomized clinical study on FET repair for acute TAAD shows that the Fontus single-branched stent graft is safe, effective and non-inferior to the conventional straight stent graft in 1-year survival and adverse event rates.

Abstract Image

一项前瞻性多中心随机对照研究表明,一种新型开放血管单支支架用于全弓修复A型主动脉夹层
背景急性 A 型主动脉夹层(TAAD)是一种危及生命的疾病,需要及时进行手术治疗。为了改善手术操作并减少并发症,需要对 TAAD 弓重建进行改进。本研究评估了一种新型单支支架移植物用于拱重建。方法和结果我们从中国的8家医院随机招募了156名急性A型主动脉夹层(TAAD)患者,让他们接受Fontus支支架移植物(75名患者)或Cronus直支架移植物(81名患者)进行冷冻象鼻干(FET)手术。在主要终点分析中,Fontus组的30天死亡率为10.7%(8/75),Cronus组为11.1%(9/81),死亡率差异为0.44%(95% CI,-9.34%至10.22%;非劣效阈值-14%)。12 个月时,Fontus 组的全因死亡率为 16.0%,而 Cronus 组为 13.6%(P = 0.670)。Fontus组的假腔(FL)阻塞率和靶病变的二次干预率分别为90.5%和98.4%,Cronus组分别为92.7%和98.6%。Fontus组有5名患者发生器械不良事件,而Cronus组未发生此类事件(P = 0.024)。1个月时,Fontus组的夹层相关死亡率为10.7%(8/75),Cronus组为11.1%(9/81)。结论这项首次针对急性TAAD的FET修复术的随机临床研究表明,Fontus单支支架移植安全、有效,在1年生存率和不良事件发生率方面不劣于传统的直支架移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信