Marie C.D. Stoner , Jenna Michaels , Jacob B. Stocks , Noah Mancuso , Zachary Soberano , Erica Browne , C. Lily Bond , Ibrahim Yigit , Allysha C. Maragh-Bass , Audrey E. Pettifor , Kathryn E. Muessig , Maria Leonora G. Comello , Margo Adams Larsen , Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman , Henna Budhwani
{"title":"Evaluating concurrency and gaps between self-report and vaccine card data for COVID-19 vaccination","authors":"Marie C.D. Stoner , Jenna Michaels , Jacob B. Stocks , Noah Mancuso , Zachary Soberano , Erica Browne , C. Lily Bond , Ibrahim Yigit , Allysha C. Maragh-Bass , Audrey E. Pettifor , Kathryn E. Muessig , Maria Leonora G. Comello , Margo Adams Larsen , Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman , Henna Budhwani","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We compared self-reported vaccination to vaccine card data to assess concurrency in a sample of Black young adults in Georgia, Alabama, and North Carolina. We described vaccine card versus self-reported data over time and examined discrepancies in reporting between these two sources. Results indicated strong currency suggesting collection of self-reported data may be an acceptable proxy to requiring official vaccine documentation. However, since 58 % of participants did not upload a vaccine card, finding should be applied with caution. Minor differences were found and were generally due to boosters that were self-reported but were not on cards. The discrepancy in number of vaccines and boosters was likely because COVID-19 vaccination has become routine and vaccine cards are not being updated regularly. At this stage in the pandemic and for other vaccinations that become routine and are administered at pharmacies, self-report may be a reliable indication of the number of vaccinations received.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 127136"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25004335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We compared self-reported vaccination to vaccine card data to assess concurrency in a sample of Black young adults in Georgia, Alabama, and North Carolina. We described vaccine card versus self-reported data over time and examined discrepancies in reporting between these two sources. Results indicated strong currency suggesting collection of self-reported data may be an acceptable proxy to requiring official vaccine documentation. However, since 58 % of participants did not upload a vaccine card, finding should be applied with caution. Minor differences were found and were generally due to boosters that were self-reported but were not on cards. The discrepancy in number of vaccines and boosters was likely because COVID-19 vaccination has become routine and vaccine cards are not being updated regularly. At this stage in the pandemic and for other vaccinations that become routine and are administered at pharmacies, self-report may be a reliable indication of the number of vaccinations received.
期刊介绍:
Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.