Geological and biostratigraphical factors in hydrocarbon recovery optimization using integrated seismic, petrophysical, and core data, Niger Delta

Abstract

The study of geologic heterogeneities (the quality of reservoir rock according to its spatial variation in properties such as grain size, mineralogy, organic content, fossil content, and natural fracture) and their impact on recovery factors, optimization, and performance of injection fluids in concurrent development (production of both oil and gas at the same time) of oil rim reservoirs (reservoirs with a thin oil column that is overlain with a large gas cap) has become necessary to explore the role of geological and biostratigraphical heterogeneity in optimizing hydrocarbon recovery from oil rim reservoirs in the Niger Delta using integrated seismic, petrophysical, and core data. This is to achieve optimum hydrocarbon recovery instead of relying only on development strategies, which is usually the practice and thus fails. Petrel and Eclipse software were used to simulate the static and dynamic models, respectively, for three oil rim reservoirs, using data (seismic, petrophysical, core, and reservoir data) from a green field in the Niger Delta, Nigeria, for concurrent development under the natural depletion (base case), surfactant enhanced-water-alternating-gas (SeWAG), and water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection options. In each option, two scenarios of injection well positions were simulated: gas-oil contact (GOC) and oil-water contact (OWC). Geological studies showed that Reservoir 1 is a heterolith facies of lower-shoreface deposits with traces of Ophiomorpha burrows, Reservoir 2 is a channel facies of lower shoreface deposits with Ophiomorpha burrows, and Reservoir 3 is a heterolith facies of upper shoreface without vertical burrows. When SeWAG of ratio 1:4:2 was injected at OWC, the highest oil recovery factor was observed compared to other options, and injection at GOC gave the highest gas recovery factor. Permeability anisotropy (Kv/Kh) for reservoirs 1 and 2, with Ophiomorpha burrows being considered, was 0.32 and 0.34, respectively. High recovery factors for both oil and gas were recorded. However, the model of the same reservoir without Ophiomorpha burrows gave reduced values of Kv/Kh of 0.12 and 0.15, respectively, with reduced recovery factors. Reservoir 3, which doesn't have burrows in the initial model, has a Kv/Kh value of 0.11 with low recovery factors in various development cases. However, when Ophiomorpha burrows were integrated into the model, Kv/Kh was 0.31, and the recovery factors increased significantly. The study has shown that geological and biostratigraphical interactions induce Kv/Kh. It has a significant optimization impact on recovery factors in concurrent development and enhances vertical sweep efficiency in EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery). The study further shows that Ophiomorpha burrows improve the geologic heterogeneity quality of a reservoir (permeability anisotropy) by enhancing the injection fluid to get into micro- and macropore spaces for efficient sweeping of oil and gas into the development well.