Life cycle sustainability assessment of staple food processing: A double and dynamic materiality approach

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Mwewa Chikonkolo Mwape , Aditya Parmar , Franz Roman , Naushad M. Emmambux , Yaovi Ouézou Azouma , Oliver Hensel
{"title":"Life cycle sustainability assessment of staple food processing: A double and dynamic materiality approach","authors":"Mwewa Chikonkolo Mwape ,&nbsp;Aditya Parmar ,&nbsp;Franz Roman ,&nbsp;Naushad M. Emmambux ,&nbsp;Yaovi Ouézou Azouma ,&nbsp;Oliver Hensel","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Globally, 70 % of people are fed through peasant food systems that are responsible for growing 50 % of the world's food calories on 30 % of the land. In the global south, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, small-scale farming serves as a crucial lifeline for the food and income needs of local populations. Yet, it remains underfunded and under-researched in the context of sustainable development. Even if the traditional Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment offers a holistic approach to evaluating the impacts of staple food processing across environmental, economic, and social dimensions, its inability to track dynamic materiality limits its application in evaluating future impacts. Therefore, this study aimed to provide a comprehensive Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment framework for staple food processing, using cassava to produce gari, a staple food for more than 300 million West Africans, as a case study. This framework integrates Material and Energy Flow Analysis techniques to trace resource use and emissions. The research incorporated Environmental, Social and Governance pillars; double materiality, evaluating both the direct and indirect impacts of processing activities, alongside dynamic materiality to capture evolving environmental, financial, and social factors through scenarios. Python computational modeling was used to perform these complex analyses, ensuring accuracy and adaptability. The findings highlight significant energy inefficiencies (6.67 kWh kg<sup>-1</sup>) coupled with a high Global Warming Potential (GWP) of 9.02 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq kg<sup>-1</sup> and production costs of $0.56 kg<sup>-1</sup>. The most significant opportunities for improvement were identified in optimizing energy consumption and transforming waste into biogas. The dynamic model revealed that integrating renewable energy sources could substantially reduce environmental impacts and increase the Net Profit Margin from 34.43 to 52.52 %, as proposed in the energy transition from woodfuel and gasoline to a Hybrid Solar and Biogas energy system. This study contributes to the growing body of literature on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment by applying a comprehensive framework to staple food processing. The findings offer valuable insights into the environmental, social, and economic trade-offs in food processing systems, providing practical recommendations for improving sustainability throughout the food supply chain. Extended studies using these methods on other staples are highly recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"56 ","pages":"Pages 343-363"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925000764","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, 70 % of people are fed through peasant food systems that are responsible for growing 50 % of the world's food calories on 30 % of the land. In the global south, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, small-scale farming serves as a crucial lifeline for the food and income needs of local populations. Yet, it remains underfunded and under-researched in the context of sustainable development. Even if the traditional Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment offers a holistic approach to evaluating the impacts of staple food processing across environmental, economic, and social dimensions, its inability to track dynamic materiality limits its application in evaluating future impacts. Therefore, this study aimed to provide a comprehensive Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment framework for staple food processing, using cassava to produce gari, a staple food for more than 300 million West Africans, as a case study. This framework integrates Material and Energy Flow Analysis techniques to trace resource use and emissions. The research incorporated Environmental, Social and Governance pillars; double materiality, evaluating both the direct and indirect impacts of processing activities, alongside dynamic materiality to capture evolving environmental, financial, and social factors through scenarios. Python computational modeling was used to perform these complex analyses, ensuring accuracy and adaptability. The findings highlight significant energy inefficiencies (6.67 kWh kg-1) coupled with a high Global Warming Potential (GWP) of 9.02 kgCO2eq kg-1 and production costs of $0.56 kg-1. The most significant opportunities for improvement were identified in optimizing energy consumption and transforming waste into biogas. The dynamic model revealed that integrating renewable energy sources could substantially reduce environmental impacts and increase the Net Profit Margin from 34.43 to 52.52 %, as proposed in the energy transition from woodfuel and gasoline to a Hybrid Solar and Biogas energy system. This study contributes to the growing body of literature on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment by applying a comprehensive framework to staple food processing. The findings offer valuable insights into the environmental, social, and economic trade-offs in food processing systems, providing practical recommendations for improving sustainability throughout the food supply chain. Extended studies using these methods on other staples are highly recommended.
主粮加工的生命周期可持续性评估:双重动态物质性方法
在全球范围内,70%的人通过农民粮食系统获得食物,而农民粮食系统在30%的土地上生产了世界上50%的食物卡路里。在全球南方,特别是在撒哈拉以南非洲,小规模农业是满足当地人口粮食和收入需求的关键生命线。然而,在可持续发展的背景下,它仍然缺乏资金和研究。尽管传统的生命周期可持续性评估提供了一种全面的方法来评估主食加工在环境、经济和社会方面的影响,但它无法跟踪动态重要性,限制了它在评估未来影响方面的应用。因此,本研究旨在为主食加工提供一个全面的生命周期可持续性评估框架,利用木薯生产gari作为案例研究,gari是3亿多西非人的主食。该框架整合了物质和能量流分析技术,以追踪资源使用和排放。这项研究纳入了环境、社会和治理支柱;双重重要性,评估加工活动的直接和间接影响,以及动态重要性,通过场景捕捉不断变化的环境、金融和社会因素。Python计算建模用于执行这些复杂的分析,以确保准确性和适应性。研究结果强调了显著的能源效率低下(6.67 kWh kg-1),加上9.02 kgCO2eq kg-1的全球变暖潜能值(GWP)和0.56美元的生产成本。在优化能源消耗和将废物转化为沼气方面确定了最重要的改进机会。动态模型显示,在从木材燃料和汽油向太阳能和沼气混合能源系统过渡的过程中,整合可再生能源可以大幅减少对环境的影响,并将净利润率从34.43%提高到52.52%。本研究通过将一个综合框架应用于主食加工,为生命周期可持续性评估的文献体的增长做出了贡献。研究结果为食品加工系统中的环境、社会和经济权衡提供了有价值的见解,为提高整个食品供应链的可持续性提供了实用建议。强烈建议在其他主食上使用这些方法进行扩展研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信