Chemical constituents of Helminthostachys zeylanica (L.) Hook. and their chemotaxonomic significance

IF 1.4 4区生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology Pub Date : 2025-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.bse.2025.105026

Mengmeng Fu , Bangcheng Gu , Ruiqing Wu , Yan Li , Huankai Yao , Suhua Qi

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phytochemical investigation on Helminthostachys zeylanica (L.) Hook. has resulted in the identification of 21 natural compounds including nine phenolic acids (1–7, 14 and 19), five alkaloids (8–11 and 13), one nucleoside (12), three saccharides (15–17), one steroid (18) and two furfural derivatives (20 and 21). Compounds were identified by analysis of NMR spectra and comparison of the data with literature. All these compounds were firstly found in the family Ophioglossaceae. Their chemotaxonomic significance was comprehensively discussed herein.

查看原文本刊更多论文

泽兰线虫的化学成分研究钩。以及它们的化学分类意义

泽兰线虫（Helminthostachys zeylanica）植物化学研究钩。鉴定出21种天然化合物，包括9种酚酸（1 - 7,14和19），5种生物碱（8-11和13），1种核苷（12），3种糖（15-17），1种类固醇（18）和2种糠醛衍生物（20和21）。通过核磁共振谱分析和文献资料比对，鉴定了化合物。这些化合物均为首次在蛇舌科中发现。本文全面讨论了它们的化学分类意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 生物-进化生物学

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

12.50%

发文量

147

审稿时长

43 days

期刊介绍： Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology). In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.