{"title":"Environmental resource theory: An integrative perspective on human habitat preferences and emotional responses to the environment","authors":"Svein Åge Kjøs Johnsen","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although modern humans occupy many habitats, human habitat preferences are relatively specific. We tend to prefer environments containing resources and avoid barren environments. Much research has focused on comparing emotional, motivational, and cognitive responses to urban and natural environments, which may be a false dichotomy. Considering environmental resources explicitly, the present article argues that resource content and resource exploitability are evolutionary relevant aspects of any environment. Findings from studies on environmental preferences and responses to urban and natural environments are reinterpreted in terms of environmental resource theory. The dynamics of moving from low to high resource environments can explain most findings within this area of research and environmental resource theory offers a different perspective on affective and cognitive restoration in nature. The relevance for climate change and environmental degradation is discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X25000182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although modern humans occupy many habitats, human habitat preferences are relatively specific. We tend to prefer environments containing resources and avoid barren environments. Much research has focused on comparing emotional, motivational, and cognitive responses to urban and natural environments, which may be a false dichotomy. Considering environmental resources explicitly, the present article argues that resource content and resource exploitability are evolutionary relevant aspects of any environment. Findings from studies on environmental preferences and responses to urban and natural environments are reinterpreted in terms of environmental resource theory. The dynamics of moving from low to high resource environments can explain most findings within this area of research and environmental resource theory offers a different perspective on affective and cognitive restoration in nature. The relevance for climate change and environmental degradation is discussed.
期刊介绍:
New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.