Modeling to evaluate permanent gully susceptibility and dominant controlling factors analysis in the black soil region of Northeast China

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Hongyue Wang , Ruixiang Liu , Yantun Song, Yating Wang, Chongfa Cai, Junguang Wang
{"title":"Modeling to evaluate permanent gully susceptibility and dominant controlling factors analysis in the black soil region of Northeast China","authors":"Hongyue Wang ,&nbsp;Ruixiang Liu ,&nbsp;Yantun Song,&nbsp;Yating Wang,&nbsp;Chongfa Cai,&nbsp;Junguang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Permanent gully caused by high-intensity agricultural activities and water erosion have severely degraded croplands in the Northeast China, a global critical black soil regions. The precise differential characteristics of the primary factors contributing to the formation of permanent gully across diverse regions and at varying scales remain unclear. It is necessary to select representative regions and scale effect models to reveal dominant factors and their influencing scales. This study selected certain permanent gully influencing factors and built three models (CF, ME, and CNN) to identify dominant controlling factors of permanent gully and assess susceptibility. ME and CNN models revealed drainage density and distance to rivers as primary drivers, distinguishing this region from others. These factors represent the degree of hydrological connectivity and energy accumulation, which trigger the occurrence and development of permanent gully when reaching a threshold value. CF model highlighted areas within specific distance to rivers and drainage density threshold are more susceptible to gully erosion. Evaluation using ROC curves showed the CNN model outperformed ME model (AUC = 0.83) and CF model (AUC = 0.77), attributed to its ability to integrate multi-scale environmental factors. The gully erosion susceptibility mapping also revealed high-risk areas in the watershed, which were mostly found in the drainage density of 0.42–0.51 km/km<sup>2</sup> and distance of 2244 m to rivers. These research results assist in preventing permanent gully to protect land resources health and underscore the importance of prioritizing high-risk areas for conservation efforts, such as implementing vegetation buffers to mitigate the development of permanent gully.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 106595"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725001497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Permanent gully caused by high-intensity agricultural activities and water erosion have severely degraded croplands in the Northeast China, a global critical black soil regions. The precise differential characteristics of the primary factors contributing to the formation of permanent gully across diverse regions and at varying scales remain unclear. It is necessary to select representative regions and scale effect models to reveal dominant factors and their influencing scales. This study selected certain permanent gully influencing factors and built three models (CF, ME, and CNN) to identify dominant controlling factors of permanent gully and assess susceptibility. ME and CNN models revealed drainage density and distance to rivers as primary drivers, distinguishing this region from others. These factors represent the degree of hydrological connectivity and energy accumulation, which trigger the occurrence and development of permanent gully when reaching a threshold value. CF model highlighted areas within specific distance to rivers and drainage density threshold are more susceptible to gully erosion. Evaluation using ROC curves showed the CNN model outperformed ME model (AUC = 0.83) and CF model (AUC = 0.77), attributed to its ability to integrate multi-scale environmental factors. The gully erosion susceptibility mapping also revealed high-risk areas in the watershed, which were mostly found in the drainage density of 0.42–0.51 km/km2 and distance of 2244 m to rivers. These research results assist in preventing permanent gully to protect land resources health and underscore the importance of prioritizing high-risk areas for conservation efforts, such as implementing vegetation buffers to mitigate the development of permanent gully.
中国东北黑土区永久性冲沟易发性评价模型及主要控制因素分析
中国东北是全球重要的黑土区,由于高强度的农业活动和水土流失而形成的永久性沟壑导致了严重的耕地退化。在不同区域、不同尺度上形成永久沟的主要因素的确切差异特征尚不清楚。有必要选择具有代表性的区域和尺度效应模型来揭示主导因素及其影响尺度。本研究选取一定的永久性沟壑影响因素,建立CF、ME、CNN三种模型,确定永久性沟壑的显性控制因素并评估易感性。ME和CNN模型显示,排水密度和到河流的距离是主要驱动因素,将该地区与其他地区区分开来。这些因子代表了水文连通性和能量积累的程度,当达到一定阈值时,触发永久沟的发生和发展。CF模型突出了与河流特定距离和排水密度阈值范围内的区域更容易受到沟蚀的影响。ROC曲线评价表明,CNN模型的综合多尺度环境因子的能力优于ME模型(AUC = 0.83)和CF模型(AUC = 0.77)。沟壑区侵蚀敏感性图也显示了流域内的高发区,主要分布在流域密度为0.42 ~ 0.51 km/km2和距离河流2244 m的区域。这些研究结果有助于预防永久性沟壑以保护土地资源健康,并强调了优先考虑高风险地区进行保护工作的重要性,例如实施植被缓冲以减缓永久性沟壑的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信