Rishika Chakraborty , Yan Li , Yan Wang , Carla Berg , Sabrina Zhang , Debra Bernat , Y. Tony Yang
{"title":"Associations between state tobacco control measures and cigarette purchases by U.S. households, 2015–2021","authors":"Rishika Chakraborty , Yan Li , Yan Wang , Carla Berg , Sabrina Zhang , Debra Bernat , Y. Tony Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>While effects of key tobacco control policies are well-documented, limited research has explored their varying associations across different policy contexts over time. This is crucial given the diverse and evolving tobacco control contexts across states and over time. We evaluated the association between state-level tobacco control measures and cigarette purchases in the US from 2015 to 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed NielsenIQ Consumer Panel data from 10,187 households that purchased cigarettes in 2015–2021. State-level tobacco control policy scores for smoke-free laws, taxes, prevention/control funding, and cessation services were obtained from the American Lung Association's State of Tobacco Control reports. Censored regression models, reporting adjusted beta estimates and 95 % confidence intervals (CI), estimated the associations between each tobacco control measure and annual household cigarette purchases, adjusting for sociodemographics (household composition, marital status, age, education, race/ethnicity, annual income, and internet connection) and accounting for clustering within households and states.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Higher scores for smoke-free laws (adjusted beta = −1.00, 95 % CI = -1.73, −0.27), taxes (adjusted beta = −1.23, 95 % CI = -1.88, −0.58), and prevention/control funding (adjusted beta = −0.22, 95 % CI = -0.38, −0.06) were associated with fewer cigarette purchases over time. In the model considering all four measures together, higher tax score was associated with fewer cigarette purchases over time (adjusted beta = −0.96, 95 % CI = -1.73, −0.87).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Smoke-free laws, taxation, and prevention/control funding play critical roles in lowering cigarette purchases, while access to cessation services alone may not drive behavioral change. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive tobacco control efforts and renewed policy action to curb cigarette use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 108291"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009174352500074X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
While effects of key tobacco control policies are well-documented, limited research has explored their varying associations across different policy contexts over time. This is crucial given the diverse and evolving tobacco control contexts across states and over time. We evaluated the association between state-level tobacco control measures and cigarette purchases in the US from 2015 to 2021.
Methods
We analyzed NielsenIQ Consumer Panel data from 10,187 households that purchased cigarettes in 2015–2021. State-level tobacco control policy scores for smoke-free laws, taxes, prevention/control funding, and cessation services were obtained from the American Lung Association's State of Tobacco Control reports. Censored regression models, reporting adjusted beta estimates and 95 % confidence intervals (CI), estimated the associations between each tobacco control measure and annual household cigarette purchases, adjusting for sociodemographics (household composition, marital status, age, education, race/ethnicity, annual income, and internet connection) and accounting for clustering within households and states.
Results
Higher scores for smoke-free laws (adjusted beta = −1.00, 95 % CI = -1.73, −0.27), taxes (adjusted beta = −1.23, 95 % CI = -1.88, −0.58), and prevention/control funding (adjusted beta = −0.22, 95 % CI = -0.38, −0.06) were associated with fewer cigarette purchases over time. In the model considering all four measures together, higher tax score was associated with fewer cigarette purchases over time (adjusted beta = −0.96, 95 % CI = -1.73, −0.87).
Conclusions
Smoke-free laws, taxation, and prevention/control funding play critical roles in lowering cigarette purchases, while access to cessation services alone may not drive behavioral change. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive tobacco control efforts and renewed policy action to curb cigarette use.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.