Risk factors for unintended discontinuation of tumor-specific treatment after tumor surgery in glioblastoma patients aged 70 or older

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Thomas Eibl, Franziska Goschütz, Adrian Liebert, Leonard Ritter, Hans-Herbert Steiner, Karl-Michael Schebesch, Markus Neher
{"title":"Risk factors for unintended discontinuation of tumor-specific treatment after tumor surgery in glioblastoma patients aged 70 or older","authors":"Thomas Eibl,&nbsp;Franziska Goschütz,&nbsp;Adrian Liebert,&nbsp;Leonard Ritter,&nbsp;Hans-Herbert Steiner,&nbsp;Karl-Michael Schebesch,&nbsp;Markus Neher","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The most beneficial treatment option for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is maximum safe resection and adjuvant therapy. Elderly patients carry a higher perioperative risk for complications, thus, predictors of unfavorable surgical outcome must be evaluated more intensively. Consequently, we sought to evaluate surgery-related paradigms leading to discontinuation of adjuvant treatment after initial neurosurgical resection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients receiving microsurgical tumor resection for newly diagnosed glioblastoma CNS WHO grade 4 were evaluated. Further inclusion criteria was age &gt;70 years. Comorbidities were summarized using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the 5 and 11 item modified frailty index (mFI-5 and mFI-11) and the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc Score. Primary endpoint was discontinuation of tumor-specific before completion of adjuvant radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>102 patients were included, mean age was 76.2 ± 4.2 years. The median extent of contrast-enhancing tumor volume was 99.1 ± 5.9 %. Surgical morbidity and mortality prohibited beginning of adjuvant treatment in 19 patients (18.6 %) and overall discontinuation of treatment before completion of radiotherapy was observed in 26/87 patients (29.9 %). Treatment failure was associated with increasing patient age (p = 0.04) and greater comorbidity scores. The mFI-5 and mFI-11 outperformed the CCI and the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc Score. Two or more points in the 5- and 11-item mFI were significantly associated with increased risk of treatment failure (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In Glioblastoma patients, advanced age and comorbidities are relevant confounders and put patients at risk for surgery-related morbidity. Nevertheless, it can be aimed at a maximum safe resection with acceptable surgical morbidity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 104253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425000724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The most beneficial treatment option for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is maximum safe resection and adjuvant therapy. Elderly patients carry a higher perioperative risk for complications, thus, predictors of unfavorable surgical outcome must be evaluated more intensively. Consequently, we sought to evaluate surgery-related paradigms leading to discontinuation of adjuvant treatment after initial neurosurgical resection.

Methods

Patients receiving microsurgical tumor resection for newly diagnosed glioblastoma CNS WHO grade 4 were evaluated. Further inclusion criteria was age >70 years. Comorbidities were summarized using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the 5 and 11 item modified frailty index (mFI-5 and mFI-11) and the CHA2DS2-VASc Score. Primary endpoint was discontinuation of tumor-specific before completion of adjuvant radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy.

Results

102 patients were included, mean age was 76.2 ± 4.2 years. The median extent of contrast-enhancing tumor volume was 99.1 ± 5.9 %. Surgical morbidity and mortality prohibited beginning of adjuvant treatment in 19 patients (18.6 %) and overall discontinuation of treatment before completion of radiotherapy was observed in 26/87 patients (29.9 %). Treatment failure was associated with increasing patient age (p = 0.04) and greater comorbidity scores. The mFI-5 and mFI-11 outperformed the CCI and the CHA2DS2-VASc Score. Two or more points in the 5- and 11-item mFI were significantly associated with increased risk of treatment failure (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

In Glioblastoma patients, advanced age and comorbidities are relevant confounders and put patients at risk for surgery-related morbidity. Nevertheless, it can be aimed at a maximum safe resection with acceptable surgical morbidity.
70岁及以上胶质母细胞瘤患者手术后意外停止肿瘤特异性治疗的危险因素
目的对新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤最有利的治疗选择是最大限度的安全切除和辅助治疗。老年患者围手术期发生并发症的风险较高,因此,对手术预后不利的预测因素必须进行更深入的评估。因此,我们试图评估导致初始神经外科切除后停止辅助治疗的手术相关范例。方法对新诊断的CNS WHO 4级胶质母细胞瘤患者行显微外科手术治疗。进一步的纳入标准是年龄70岁。采用Charlson共病指数(CCI)、5项和11项修正衰弱指数(mFI-5和mFI-11)和CHA2DS2-VASc评分对合并症进行总结。主要终点是在辅助放疗或放化疗完成前停止肿瘤特异性治疗。结果纳入102例患者,平均年龄76.2±4.2岁。肿瘤体积增强的中位范围为99.1%±5.9%。手术发病率和死亡率禁止开始辅助治疗的患者19例(18.6%),在放疗完成前全面停止治疗的患者26例(29.9%)。治疗失败与患者年龄增加(p = 0.04)和更高的合并症评分相关。mFI-5和mFI-11优于CCI和CHA2DS2-VASc评分。5项和11项mFI评分中的2分或2分以上与治疗失败风险增加显著相关(分别为p = 0.004和p = 0.001)。结论在胶质母细胞瘤患者中,高龄和合并症是相关的混杂因素,使患者有手术相关发病率的风险。然而,它的目的是在可接受的手术发病率的最大安全切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信