Pascal Bodmer, Christoph Bors, Liu Liu, Andreas Lorke
{"title":"Large sediment methane production potential in reservoirs compared to lakes and rivers","authors":"Pascal Bodmer, Christoph Bors, Liu Liu, Andreas Lorke","doi":"10.1002/lno.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inland waters emit a globally significant amount of methane (CH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub>) into the atmosphere. Measurements of potential CH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> production rates in the sediment can help constrain the magnitude of CH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> sources and time‐averaged emission rates. We explored the magnitude, variability, and drivers of potential CH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> production rates in the sediment, based on compiled measurements (238 sediment cores from 72 aquatic systems) following a standardized laboratory incubation procedure. The data reveal > 4‐fold higher potential CH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> production rates in reservoir sediments than lakes and > 14‐fold higher than rivers after being standardized for temperature. Sediment organic carbon content and depth below the sediment–water interface are universal drivers for potential CH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> production rates across freshwater ecosystems. The disproportional high CH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> production rate in sediments from human‐made water bodies calls for more comprehensive monitoring of their CH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> emissions to inform carbon footprint and inventory efforts. This first meta‐analysis of potential CH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> production rates in sediments from different types of freshwater aquatic systems may help with process‐based modeling of CH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> emissions from individual water bodies in larger‐scale assessments.","PeriodicalId":18143,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.70063","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Inland waters emit a globally significant amount of methane (CH4) into the atmosphere. Measurements of potential CH4 production rates in the sediment can help constrain the magnitude of CH4 sources and time‐averaged emission rates. We explored the magnitude, variability, and drivers of potential CH4 production rates in the sediment, based on compiled measurements (238 sediment cores from 72 aquatic systems) following a standardized laboratory incubation procedure. The data reveal > 4‐fold higher potential CH4 production rates in reservoir sediments than lakes and > 14‐fold higher than rivers after being standardized for temperature. Sediment organic carbon content and depth below the sediment–water interface are universal drivers for potential CH4 production rates across freshwater ecosystems. The disproportional high CH4 production rate in sediments from human‐made water bodies calls for more comprehensive monitoring of their CH4 emissions to inform carbon footprint and inventory efforts. This first meta‐analysis of potential CH4 production rates in sediments from different types of freshwater aquatic systems may help with process‐based modeling of CH4 emissions from individual water bodies in larger‐scale assessments.
期刊介绍:
Limnology and Oceanography (L&O; print ISSN 0024-3590, online ISSN 1939-5590) publishes original articles, including scholarly reviews, about all aspects of limnology and oceanography. The journal''s unifying theme is the understanding of aquatic systems. Submissions are judged on the originality of their data, interpretations, and ideas, and on the degree to which they can be generalized beyond the particular aquatic system examined. Laboratory and modeling studies must demonstrate relevance to field environments; typically this means that they are bolstered by substantial "real-world" data. Few purely theoretical or purely empirical papers are accepted for review.