Are Retail Consumers Willing to Pay for All Circular Products? A Study on Consumer Perception of the Circular Economy in Retail

IF 12.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Agnes Toth‐Peter, Sadia Cheema, Rui Torres de Oliveira, Tam Nguyen
{"title":"Are Retail Consumers Willing to Pay for All Circular Products? A Study on Consumer Perception of the Circular Economy in Retail","authors":"Agnes Toth‐Peter, Sadia Cheema, Rui Torres de Oliveira, Tam Nguyen","doi":"10.1002/bse.4269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The planetary crisis, stemming from overconsumption and unsustainable production patterns, necessitates a shift towards balanced economic, environmental and social growth. The circular economy presents a promising solution by promoting material recirculation. While its success relies on collaboration among various stakeholders, consumers are crucial for accepting circular economy products and business models. However, despite increasing environmental awareness, the literature shows that many consumers resist purchasing previously used products due to perceived inferiority, risk and low quality, which could hinder the adoption of circular economy products. Understanding consumer behaviour, particularly their willingness to buy and pay for circular economy products, is essential for businesses seeking to promote sustainable consumption and achieve market growth. This study investigates consumer perceptions of circular economy, using simplified terms of reused, recycled and recovered, across 11 product categories through a quantitative survey of 607 Australian respondents. The results indicate that personal financial benefits are prioritised over ecological reasons, and there is variability in perceived product performance across categories. Additionally, price sensitivity and affordability play a key role in consumer decision‐making. Notably, while younger and male consumers show a greater inclination to purchase circular economy products, the broader consumer base remains unwilling to pay a premium. These insights can guide businesses and policymakers in developing targeted strategies emphasising price, functionality and quality to enhance consumer acceptance and adoption of circular economy products. We advance theory by demonstrating that consumer decisions are primarily driven by personal financial savings, rather than ecological or social benefits, challenging the prevailing assumption in literature that environmental and social motivations are the key drivers of sustainable consumption, even in developed economies. We also emphasise the need for theories to account for significant variability in perceived product performance across categories when investigating willingness to pay for circular economy products.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4269","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The planetary crisis, stemming from overconsumption and unsustainable production patterns, necessitates a shift towards balanced economic, environmental and social growth. The circular economy presents a promising solution by promoting material recirculation. While its success relies on collaboration among various stakeholders, consumers are crucial for accepting circular economy products and business models. However, despite increasing environmental awareness, the literature shows that many consumers resist purchasing previously used products due to perceived inferiority, risk and low quality, which could hinder the adoption of circular economy products. Understanding consumer behaviour, particularly their willingness to buy and pay for circular economy products, is essential for businesses seeking to promote sustainable consumption and achieve market growth. This study investigates consumer perceptions of circular economy, using simplified terms of reused, recycled and recovered, across 11 product categories through a quantitative survey of 607 Australian respondents. The results indicate that personal financial benefits are prioritised over ecological reasons, and there is variability in perceived product performance across categories. Additionally, price sensitivity and affordability play a key role in consumer decision‐making. Notably, while younger and male consumers show a greater inclination to purchase circular economy products, the broader consumer base remains unwilling to pay a premium. These insights can guide businesses and policymakers in developing targeted strategies emphasising price, functionality and quality to enhance consumer acceptance and adoption of circular economy products. We advance theory by demonstrating that consumer decisions are primarily driven by personal financial savings, rather than ecological or social benefits, challenging the prevailing assumption in literature that environmental and social motivations are the key drivers of sustainable consumption, even in developed economies. We also emphasise the need for theories to account for significant variability in perceived product performance across categories when investigating willingness to pay for circular economy products.
零售消费者是否愿意为所有循环产品付费?关于消费者对零售业循环经济看法的研究
由于过度消费和不可持续的生产模式造成的全球危机,需要转向平衡的经济、环境和社会增长。通过促进材料再循环,循环经济提供了一个很有前途的解决方案。虽然它的成功依赖于各利益相关者之间的合作,但消费者对于接受循环经济产品和商业模式至关重要。然而,尽管环保意识不断增强,但文献显示,许多消费者由于自卑、风险和低质量而拒绝购买以前使用过的产品,这可能会阻碍循环经济产品的采用。了解消费者的行为,特别是他们购买和支付循环经济产品的意愿,对于寻求促进可持续消费和实现市场增长的企业至关重要。本研究通过对607名澳大利亚受访者的定量调查,调查了消费者对循环经济的看法,使用了重复使用、回收和回收的简化术语,涉及11个产品类别。结果表明,个人经济利益优先于生态原因,并且不同类别的感知产品性能存在差异。此外,价格敏感性和可承受性在消费者决策中起着关键作用。值得注意的是,尽管年轻和男性消费者更倾向于购买循环经济产品,但更广泛的消费者群体仍然不愿意支付溢价。这些见解可以指导企业和政策制定者制定有针对性的战略,强调价格、功能和质量,以提高消费者对循环经济产品的接受和采用。我们通过证明消费者的决定主要是由个人财务储蓄驱动的,而不是由生态或社会利益驱动的,从而推进了理论,挑战了文献中普遍存在的假设,即环境和社会动机是可持续消费的关键驱动因素,即使在发达经济体也是如此。我们还强调,在调查购买循环经济产品的意愿时,需要理论来解释不同类别的感知产品性能的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信