Shen Qu , Yuanzhen Zhao , Muhan Li , Xiaohui Ren , Chenyu Wang , Xu Yang , Yanling Hao , Shaogang Dong , Ruihong Yu
{"title":"Unveiling sources and fate of sulfate in lake-groundwater system combined Bayesian isotope mixing model with radon mass balance model","authors":"Shen Qu , Yuanzhen Zhao , Muhan Li , Xiaohui Ren , Chenyu Wang , Xu Yang , Yanling Hao , Shaogang Dong , Ruihong Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The role of various natural and anthropogenic factors in controlling sulfate behavior in lake-groundwater system is not fully understood. In this study, a hybrid isotopic approach incorporating multi-isotopes (D/<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub>/<sup>34</sup>S/<sup>18</sup>O<sub>SO4</sub>/<sup>222</sup>Rn) and quantitative models was used to reveal and quantify the sources and fate of sulfate in two lake-groundwater systems (Daihai and Ulansuhai Lake basins) in Inner Mongolia, China. In the Daihai Lake basin, dissolved sulfate was mainly derived from evaporite dissolution (> 50 %) and sulfide oxidation (10 % ∼ 30 %; including mineralization and pyrite oxidation). In contrast, the main dissolved sulfate sources in the Ulansuhai Lake basin included evaporite dissolution (40 % ∼ 60 %) and sewage and manure (20 % ∼ 40 %) accompanied by the bacterial sulfate reduction process. Notably, the sulfate flux associated with lacustrine groundwater discharge in the Ulansuhai Lake basin (2.77 × 10<sup>8</sup> g/L) was significantly greater than that in the Daihai Lake basin (1.63 × 10<sup>6</sup> g/L). However, the contribution of groundwater-derived sulfate showed the opposite result. Differences in hydrogeological conditions and human activities in the two basins were the dominant factors controlling the variability in sulfate sources and fate. The approaches and findings of this study can enhance the ability to identify sulfate sources and fate in lake-groundwater systems in similar regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"282 ","pages":"Article 123648"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135425005585","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The role of various natural and anthropogenic factors in controlling sulfate behavior in lake-groundwater system is not fully understood. In this study, a hybrid isotopic approach incorporating multi-isotopes (D/18OH2O/34S/18OSO4/222Rn) and quantitative models was used to reveal and quantify the sources and fate of sulfate in two lake-groundwater systems (Daihai and Ulansuhai Lake basins) in Inner Mongolia, China. In the Daihai Lake basin, dissolved sulfate was mainly derived from evaporite dissolution (> 50 %) and sulfide oxidation (10 % ∼ 30 %; including mineralization and pyrite oxidation). In contrast, the main dissolved sulfate sources in the Ulansuhai Lake basin included evaporite dissolution (40 % ∼ 60 %) and sewage and manure (20 % ∼ 40 %) accompanied by the bacterial sulfate reduction process. Notably, the sulfate flux associated with lacustrine groundwater discharge in the Ulansuhai Lake basin (2.77 × 108 g/L) was significantly greater than that in the Daihai Lake basin (1.63 × 106 g/L). However, the contribution of groundwater-derived sulfate showed the opposite result. Differences in hydrogeological conditions and human activities in the two basins were the dominant factors controlling the variability in sulfate sources and fate. The approaches and findings of this study can enhance the ability to identify sulfate sources and fate in lake-groundwater systems in similar regions.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.