Exploring Site-Specific Carbon Dioxide Removal Options With Storage or Sequestration in the Marine Environment – The 10 Mt CO2 yr−1 Removal Challenge for Germany

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Earths Future Pub Date : 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1029/2024EF004902
W. Yao, T. M. Morganti, J. Wu, M. Borchers, A. Anschütz, L.-K. Bednarz, K. A. Bhaumik, M. Böttcher, K. Burkhard, T. Cabus, A. S. Chua, I. Diercks, M. Esposito, M. Fink, M. Fouqueray, F. Gasanzade, S. Geilert, J. Hauck, F. Havermann, I. Hellige, S. Hoog, M. Jürchott, H. T. Kalapurakkal, J. Kemper, I. Kremin, I. Lange, J. M. Lencina-Avila, M. Liadova, F. Liu, S. Mathesius, N. Mehendale, T. Nagwekar, M. Philippi, G. L. N. Luz, M. Ramasamy, F. Stahl, L. Tank, M.-E. Vorrath, L. Westmark, H.-W. Wey, R. Wollnik, M. Wölfelschneider, W. Bach, K. Bischof, M. Boersma, U. Daewel, M. Fernández-Méndez, J. K. Geuer, D. P. Keller, A. Kopf, C. Merk, N. Moosdorf, N. Oppelt, A. Oschlies, J. Pongratz, A. Proelss, G. J. Rehder, L. Rüpke, N. Szarka, D. Thraen, K. Wallmann, N. Mengis
{"title":"Exploring Site-Specific Carbon Dioxide Removal Options With Storage or Sequestration in the Marine Environment – The 10 Mt CO2 yr−1 Removal Challenge for Germany","authors":"W. Yao,&nbsp;T. M. Morganti,&nbsp;J. Wu,&nbsp;M. Borchers,&nbsp;A. Anschütz,&nbsp;L.-K. Bednarz,&nbsp;K. A. Bhaumik,&nbsp;M. Böttcher,&nbsp;K. Burkhard,&nbsp;T. Cabus,&nbsp;A. S. Chua,&nbsp;I. Diercks,&nbsp;M. Esposito,&nbsp;M. Fink,&nbsp;M. Fouqueray,&nbsp;F. Gasanzade,&nbsp;S. Geilert,&nbsp;J. Hauck,&nbsp;F. Havermann,&nbsp;I. Hellige,&nbsp;S. Hoog,&nbsp;M. Jürchott,&nbsp;H. T. Kalapurakkal,&nbsp;J. Kemper,&nbsp;I. Kremin,&nbsp;I. Lange,&nbsp;J. M. Lencina-Avila,&nbsp;M. Liadova,&nbsp;F. Liu,&nbsp;S. Mathesius,&nbsp;N. Mehendale,&nbsp;T. Nagwekar,&nbsp;M. Philippi,&nbsp;G. L. N. Luz,&nbsp;M. Ramasamy,&nbsp;F. Stahl,&nbsp;L. Tank,&nbsp;M.-E. Vorrath,&nbsp;L. Westmark,&nbsp;H.-W. Wey,&nbsp;R. Wollnik,&nbsp;M. Wölfelschneider,&nbsp;W. Bach,&nbsp;K. Bischof,&nbsp;M. Boersma,&nbsp;U. Daewel,&nbsp;M. Fernández-Méndez,&nbsp;J. K. Geuer,&nbsp;D. P. Keller,&nbsp;A. Kopf,&nbsp;C. Merk,&nbsp;N. Moosdorf,&nbsp;N. Oppelt,&nbsp;A. Oschlies,&nbsp;J. Pongratz,&nbsp;A. Proelss,&nbsp;G. J. Rehder,&nbsp;L. Rüpke,&nbsp;N. Szarka,&nbsp;D. Thraen,&nbsp;K. Wallmann,&nbsp;N. Mengis","doi":"10.1029/2024EF004902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) and geological carbon storage in the marine environment (mCS) promise to help mitigate global climate change alongside drastic emission reductions. However, the implementable potential of mCDR and mCS depends, apart from technology readiness, also on site-specific conditions. In this work, we explore different options for mCDR and mCS, using the German context as a case study. We challenge each option to remove 10 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup>, accounting for 8%–22% of projected hard-to-abate and residual emissions of Germany in 2045. We focus on the environmental, resource, and infrastructure requirements of individual mCDR and mCS options at specific sites, within the German jurisdiction when possible. This serves as an entry point to discuss main uncertainty factors and research needs beyond technology readiness, and, where possible, cost estimates, expected environmental effects, and monitoring approaches. In total, we describe 10 mCDR and mCS options; four aim at enhancing the chemical carbon uptake of the ocean through alkalinity enhancement, four aim at enhancing blue carbon ecosystems' sink capacity, and two employ geological off-shore storage. Our results indicate that five out of 10 options would potentially be implementable within German jurisdiction, and three of them could potentially meet the challenge. Our exercise serves as an example on how the creation of more tangible and site-specific CDR options can provide a basis for the assessment of socio-economic, ethical, political, and legal aspects for such implementations. The approach presented here can easily be applied to other regional or national CDR capacity considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF004902","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF004902","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) and geological carbon storage in the marine environment (mCS) promise to help mitigate global climate change alongside drastic emission reductions. However, the implementable potential of mCDR and mCS depends, apart from technology readiness, also on site-specific conditions. In this work, we explore different options for mCDR and mCS, using the German context as a case study. We challenge each option to remove 10 Mt CO2 yr−1, accounting for 8%–22% of projected hard-to-abate and residual emissions of Germany in 2045. We focus on the environmental, resource, and infrastructure requirements of individual mCDR and mCS options at specific sites, within the German jurisdiction when possible. This serves as an entry point to discuss main uncertainty factors and research needs beyond technology readiness, and, where possible, cost estimates, expected environmental effects, and monitoring approaches. In total, we describe 10 mCDR and mCS options; four aim at enhancing the chemical carbon uptake of the ocean through alkalinity enhancement, four aim at enhancing blue carbon ecosystems' sink capacity, and two employ geological off-shore storage. Our results indicate that five out of 10 options would potentially be implementable within German jurisdiction, and three of them could potentially meet the challenge. Our exercise serves as an example on how the creation of more tangible and site-specific CDR options can provide a basis for the assessment of socio-economic, ethical, political, and legal aspects for such implementations. The approach presented here can easily be applied to other regional or national CDR capacity considerations.

Abstract Image

探索在海洋环境中储存或封存特定地点的二氧化碳去除方案--德国每年去除 1000 万吨二氧化碳的挑战
海洋二氧化碳去除(mCDR)和海洋环境地质碳储存(mCS)有望在大幅减排的同时,帮助缓解全球气候变化。然而,mCDR和mCS的可实施潜力除了取决于技术准备情况外,还取决于具体地点的条件。在这项工作中,我们以德国为例,探讨了mCDR和mCS的不同选择。我们对每一种方案都提出了挑战,即每年减排1000万吨二氧化碳,占德国2045年预计难以减排和剩余排放量的8%-22%。在可能的情况下,我们关注德国管辖范围内特定地点的单个mCDR和mCS选项的环境、资源和基础设施要求。这可以作为一个切入点,讨论主要的不确定性因素和技术准备之外的研究需求,并在可能的情况下,讨论成本估算、预期的环境影响和监测方法。我们总共描述了10种mCDR和mCS选项;其中四个旨在通过增强碱度来增强海洋的化学碳吸收,四个旨在增强蓝碳生态系统的汇容量,两个采用地质离岸储存。我们的研究结果表明,10个选项中有5个可能在德国管辖范围内实施,其中3个可能会面临挑战。我们的实践作为一个例子,说明如何创建更具体和具体的CDR选项,为此类实施的社会经济、道德、政治和法律方面的评估提供基础。这里提出的方法可以很容易地应用于其他区域或国家CDR能力考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信