Effects of Organic and Synthetic Fertiliser on Insect Herbivore Populations in Quinoa

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Liesl Oeller, Benjamin W. Lee, Saumik Basu, Kevin M. Murphy, David W. Crowder
{"title":"Effects of Organic and Synthetic Fertiliser on Insect Herbivore Populations in Quinoa","authors":"Liesl Oeller,&nbsp;Benjamin W. Lee,&nbsp;Saumik Basu,&nbsp;Kevin M. Murphy,&nbsp;David W. Crowder","doi":"10.1111/jen.13398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fertilisers are used in agriculture to promote crop productivity. There are many nutrient sources in fertilisers, and different sources cause variation in plant defence and pest tolerance. Assessing how pests respond to different types of fertilisers is key to develop integrated pest management programs. Here, we assessed how two fertilisers applied to quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd.) affected cowpea aphid (<i>Aphis craccivora</i> Koch<i>.</i>) and <i>Lygus spp.</i> survival and reproduction. Quinoa is a newly introduced crop in the USA, and fertiliser regimes using organic or synthetic nitrogen sources are being evaluated. We quantified growth and survival of each pest on organic- and synthetic-fertilised quinoa for two varieties in cages and the open field. We also quantified gene expression associated with three phytohormones involved in chemical defence to identify potential mechanisms of treatment effects. In cages, organic-fertilised quinoa had the fewest aphids and lowest <i>Lygus</i> survival. However, the effects were weaker in the open field, where aphids were marginally less abundant on organic-fertilised plants and no effects of fertiliser on <i>Lygus</i> were observed. There was also evidence for fertiliser altering defence gene expression, suggesting a possible mechanism impacting pest behaviour and fitness. Overall, our study shows that fertilisers from different sources may provide varying levels of pest control in quinoa crops.</p>","PeriodicalId":14987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Entomology","volume":"149 4","pages":"515-523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jen.13398","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jen.13398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fertilisers are used in agriculture to promote crop productivity. There are many nutrient sources in fertilisers, and different sources cause variation in plant defence and pest tolerance. Assessing how pests respond to different types of fertilisers is key to develop integrated pest management programs. Here, we assessed how two fertilisers applied to quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) affected cowpea aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch.) and Lygus spp. survival and reproduction. Quinoa is a newly introduced crop in the USA, and fertiliser regimes using organic or synthetic nitrogen sources are being evaluated. We quantified growth and survival of each pest on organic- and synthetic-fertilised quinoa for two varieties in cages and the open field. We also quantified gene expression associated with three phytohormones involved in chemical defence to identify potential mechanisms of treatment effects. In cages, organic-fertilised quinoa had the fewest aphids and lowest Lygus survival. However, the effects were weaker in the open field, where aphids were marginally less abundant on organic-fertilised plants and no effects of fertiliser on Lygus were observed. There was also evidence for fertiliser altering defence gene expression, suggesting a possible mechanism impacting pest behaviour and fitness. Overall, our study shows that fertilisers from different sources may provide varying levels of pest control in quinoa crops.

Abstract Image

有机肥料和合成肥料对藜麦中食草昆虫种群的影响
肥料用于农业,以提高作物产量。肥料中有许多养分来源,不同的养分来源会导致植物防御能力和害虫耐受能力的差异。评估害虫对不同类型肥料的反应是制定害虫综合治理计划的关键。在此,我们评估了施用在藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)上的两种肥料如何影响豇豆蚜(Aphis craccivora Koch.)和Lygus spp.的生存和繁殖。藜麦是美国新引进的作物,目前正在评估使用有机氮源或合成氮源的施肥方案。我们对笼养和露地栽培的两个品种的有机肥和合成肥藜麦上每种害虫的生长和存活情况进行了量化。我们还量化了参与化学防御的三种植物激素的相关基因表达,以确定处理效果的潜在机制。在笼中,有机施肥藜麦的蚜虫数量最少,Lygus存活率最低。然而,在露天田野中的效果较弱,有机施肥植物上的蚜虫数量略少,而且没有观察到肥料对枸杞的影响。还有证据表明,肥料会改变防御基因的表达,这可能是影响害虫行为和生存能力的一种机制。总之,我们的研究表明,不同来源的肥料可为藜麦作物提供不同程度的害虫控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Entomology publishes original articles on current research in applied entomology, including mites and spiders in terrestrial ecosystems. Submit your next manuscript for rapid publication: the average time is currently 6 months from submission to publication. With Journal of Applied Entomology''s dynamic article-by-article publication process, Early View, fully peer-reviewed and type-set articles are published online as soon as they complete, without waiting for full issue compilation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信