Mapping Peatland Distribution and Quantifying Peatland Below-Ground Carbon Stocks in Colombia's Eastern Lowlands

IF 3.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
A. Uhde, A. M. Hoyt, L. Hess, C. Schmullius, E. Mendoza, J. C. Benavides, S. Trumbore, J. M. Martín-López, P. N. Skillings-Neira, R. S. Winton
{"title":"Mapping Peatland Distribution and Quantifying Peatland Below-Ground Carbon Stocks in Colombia's Eastern Lowlands","authors":"A. Uhde,&nbsp;A. M. Hoyt,&nbsp;L. Hess,&nbsp;C. Schmullius,&nbsp;E. Mendoza,&nbsp;J. C. Benavides,&nbsp;S. Trumbore,&nbsp;J. M. Martín-López,&nbsp;P. N. Skillings-Neira,&nbsp;R. S. Winton","doi":"10.1029/2024JG008505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The extent and distribution of tropical peatlands, and their importance as a vulnerable carbon (C) store, remain poorly quantified. Although large peatland complexes in Peru, the Congo basin, and Southeast Asia have been mapped in detail, information on many other tropical areas is uncertain. In the Eastern Colombian lowlands, peatland area estimates range from 700 km<sup>2</sup> to nearly 60,000 km<sup>2</sup>, leading to highly uncertain C stocks. Using new field data, high-resolution Earth observation (EO), and a random forest approach, we mapped peatlands across Colombian territory East of the Andes below 400 m elevation. We estimated peatland extent using two approaches: a conservative method focused on medium-to-high peat probability areas and a more inclusive one accounting for large low-probability areas. Multiplying these extents by below-ground carbon density yields a conservative estimate of 0.95 (0.6–1.39 Pg C, 95% confidence interval) over 9,391 km<sup>2</sup> (7,369–11,549 km<sup>2</sup>) and up to 2.86 Pg C (1.76–4.22 Pg C) across 29,069 km<sup>2</sup> (22,429–36,238 km<sup>2</sup>). Among four potentially peat-forming ecosystems identified, palm swamps and floodplain forests contributed most to the peat extent and C stock. We found that most peatland patches were relatively small, covering less than 100 ha. We compared our map to previously published global and pan-tropical peat maps and found low spatial overlap among them, suggesting that peat maps uninformed by local field information may not precisely specify which landscape areas within a peatland-rich region are actually peatlands. We further assessed the suitability of different EO and climate variables, highlighting the need for high-resolution data to capture local heterogeneities in the landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":16003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JG008505","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JG008505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extent and distribution of tropical peatlands, and their importance as a vulnerable carbon (C) store, remain poorly quantified. Although large peatland complexes in Peru, the Congo basin, and Southeast Asia have been mapped in detail, information on many other tropical areas is uncertain. In the Eastern Colombian lowlands, peatland area estimates range from 700 km2 to nearly 60,000 km2, leading to highly uncertain C stocks. Using new field data, high-resolution Earth observation (EO), and a random forest approach, we mapped peatlands across Colombian territory East of the Andes below 400 m elevation. We estimated peatland extent using two approaches: a conservative method focused on medium-to-high peat probability areas and a more inclusive one accounting for large low-probability areas. Multiplying these extents by below-ground carbon density yields a conservative estimate of 0.95 (0.6–1.39 Pg C, 95% confidence interval) over 9,391 km2 (7,369–11,549 km2) and up to 2.86 Pg C (1.76–4.22 Pg C) across 29,069 km2 (22,429–36,238 km2). Among four potentially peat-forming ecosystems identified, palm swamps and floodplain forests contributed most to the peat extent and C stock. We found that most peatland patches were relatively small, covering less than 100 ha. We compared our map to previously published global and pan-tropical peat maps and found low spatial overlap among them, suggesting that peat maps uninformed by local field information may not precisely specify which landscape areas within a peatland-rich region are actually peatlands. We further assessed the suitability of different EO and climate variables, highlighting the need for high-resolution data to capture local heterogeneities in the landscape.

Abstract Image

绘制哥伦比亚东部低地泥炭地分布和量化泥炭地地下碳储量
热带泥炭地的范围和分布,以及它们作为脆弱碳(C)储存的重要性,仍然缺乏量化。虽然秘鲁、刚果盆地和东南亚的大型泥炭地复合体已被详细绘制,但许多其他热带地区的信息尚不确定。在哥伦比亚东部低地,泥炭地面积估计在700平方公里至近6万平方公里之间,导致碳储量高度不确定。利用新的野外数据、高分辨率地球观测(EO)和随机森林方法,我们绘制了安第斯山脉以东400米海拔以下哥伦比亚境内的泥炭地。我们使用两种方法来估计泥炭地的范围:一种保守的方法侧重于中到高泥炭概率区域,另一种更具包容性的方法考虑大的低概率区域。将这些范围乘以地下碳密度,保守估计在9,391平方公里(7,369-11,549平方公里)上为0.95 (0.6-1.39 Pg C, 95%置信区间),在29,069平方公里(22,429-36,238平方公里)上为2.86 Pg C (1.76-4.22 Pg C)。在确定的四个可能形成泥炭的生态系统中,棕榈沼泽和洪泛区森林对泥炭范围和碳储量贡献最大。我们发现,大多数泥炭地斑块相对较小,覆盖面积不到100公顷。我们将我们的地图与之前出版的全球和泛热带泥炭地地图进行了比较,发现它们之间的空间重叠程度很低,这表明没有当地实地信息的泥炭地地图可能无法精确地指定泥炭地丰富区域内的哪些景观区域实际上是泥炭地。我们进一步评估了不同EO和气候变量的适用性,强调需要高分辨率数据来捕捉景观的局部异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: JGR-Biogeosciences focuses on biogeosciences of the Earth system in the past, present, and future and the extension of this research to planetary studies. The emerging field of biogeosciences spans the intellectual interface between biology and the geosciences and attempts to understand the functions of the Earth system across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Studies in biogeosciences may use multiple lines of evidence drawn from diverse fields to gain a holistic understanding of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems and extreme environments. Specific topics within the scope of the section include process-based theoretical, experimental, and field studies of biogeochemistry, biogeophysics, atmosphere-, land-, and ocean-ecosystem interactions, biomineralization, life in extreme environments, astrobiology, microbial processes, geomicrobiology, and evolutionary geobiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信