Stained glass ceilings: Gender and race in accounting academia in Brazil

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Sandra Maria Cerqueira da Silva, Silvia Pereira de Castro Casa Nova
{"title":"Stained glass ceilings: Gender and race in accounting academia in Brazil","authors":"Sandra Maria Cerqueira da Silva,&nbsp;Silvia Pereira de Castro Casa Nova","doi":"10.1111/gwao.13201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Brazil is divided into five large regions marked by profound economic and social inequalities. Such vast differences can make people feel like “foreigners”, even though they live in the same country. Here, meritocracy is seen as the criterion for assessing and promoting people, which is conflicting given the absurdly unequal contexts in the country. This choice widens inequalities of gender, race and, above all, social class. Between 2000 and 2018, Brazil experienced profound social transformations. Female participation in the labor market grew, although there were still barriers to access and professional advancement for women, which were exacerbated in the case of black women. When it came to leadership positions, they were almost always blocked by processes which depended on subjective decisions from evaluators. These circumstances occur through daily confrontations with processes of sexualisation and racialisation. These transformations were followed in the most recent period by clear setbacks, deepened by the COVID-19 pandemic and intense political polarization. A milestone in terms of <i>Esperançar</i>, a verb proposed by Paulo Freire (1992), were the 2022 presidential elections, understood as a process of re-democratisation. The social achievements that have been maintained, however, are ‘advances’ that work differently when the diversity of the population and regional differences are taken into account. With this particular context in mind, the aim of this study is to investigate how the “glass ceiling” phenomenon has been present in the daily interactions and academic trajectory of black women in the accounting field. The question that underpinned this study was: how can the academic accounting environment, considering practice and discourse, boost or hinder the “glass ceiling” phenomenon in the professional career of black female academics? This is a qualitative study with a post-structuralist approach, based on the adoption of auto-ethnographic and oral history techniques. The evidence was built up through semi-structured, in-depth interviews with female academics who had graduated from postgraduate programmes. This corpus was analyzed from an interpretivist perspective and the findings reveal that the “glass ceiling” phenomenon is present in accounting academia in Brazil and is expressed in barriers specific to the field. Barriers are erected in processes of closure, blocking the path of black women who aim to succeed in prestigious academic spaces, regardless of their level of qualification. In this way, they are conceptualized as “stained glass ceilings”, because the barriers become visible and concrete in a country where racism is a structuring element of social relations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48128,"journal":{"name":"Gender Work and Organization","volume":"32 3","pages":"1263-1288"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Work and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.13201","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brazil is divided into five large regions marked by profound economic and social inequalities. Such vast differences can make people feel like “foreigners”, even though they live in the same country. Here, meritocracy is seen as the criterion for assessing and promoting people, which is conflicting given the absurdly unequal contexts in the country. This choice widens inequalities of gender, race and, above all, social class. Between 2000 and 2018, Brazil experienced profound social transformations. Female participation in the labor market grew, although there were still barriers to access and professional advancement for women, which were exacerbated in the case of black women. When it came to leadership positions, they were almost always blocked by processes which depended on subjective decisions from evaluators. These circumstances occur through daily confrontations with processes of sexualisation and racialisation. These transformations were followed in the most recent period by clear setbacks, deepened by the COVID-19 pandemic and intense political polarization. A milestone in terms of Esperançar, a verb proposed by Paulo Freire (1992), were the 2022 presidential elections, understood as a process of re-democratisation. The social achievements that have been maintained, however, are ‘advances’ that work differently when the diversity of the population and regional differences are taken into account. With this particular context in mind, the aim of this study is to investigate how the “glass ceiling” phenomenon has been present in the daily interactions and academic trajectory of black women in the accounting field. The question that underpinned this study was: how can the academic accounting environment, considering practice and discourse, boost or hinder the “glass ceiling” phenomenon in the professional career of black female academics? This is a qualitative study with a post-structuralist approach, based on the adoption of auto-ethnographic and oral history techniques. The evidence was built up through semi-structured, in-depth interviews with female academics who had graduated from postgraduate programmes. This corpus was analyzed from an interpretivist perspective and the findings reveal that the “glass ceiling” phenomenon is present in accounting academia in Brazil and is expressed in barriers specific to the field. Barriers are erected in processes of closure, blocking the path of black women who aim to succeed in prestigious academic spaces, regardless of their level of qualification. In this way, they are conceptualized as “stained glass ceilings”, because the barriers become visible and concrete in a country where racism is a structuring element of social relations.

彩色玻璃天花板:巴西会计学术界的性别与种族
巴西分为五大地区,经济和社会不平等现象严重。如此巨大的差异会让人们觉得自己是“外国人”,即使他们生活在同一个国家。在这里,任人唯贤被视为评估和提升人才的标准,鉴于这个国家荒谬的不平等背景,这是相互矛盾的。这种选择扩大了性别、种族,尤其是社会阶层的不平等。2000年至2018年,巴西经历了深刻的社会变革。妇女对劳动力市场的参与有所增加,尽管在进入劳动力市场和职业晋升方面仍然存在障碍,黑人妇女的情况更加严重。当涉及到领导职位时,他们几乎总是被依赖于评估者主观决定的过程所阻碍。这些情况发生在每天与性化和种族化过程的对抗中。在这些转变之后,在最近一段时期出现了明显的挫折,COVID-19大流行和政治两极分化加剧了这种挫折。就世界语而言,一个里程碑是2022年的总统选举,这是保罗·弗莱雷(1992年)提出的一个动词,被理解为一个重新民主化的过程。然而,维持的社会成就是“进步”,如果考虑到人口的多样性和区域差异,这些进步就会产生不同的效果。考虑到这一特殊背景,本研究的目的是调查“玻璃天花板”现象在会计领域黑人女性的日常互动和学术轨迹中是如何存在的。支撑本研究的问题是:考虑到实践和话语,学术会计环境如何促进或阻碍黑人女性学者职业生涯中的“玻璃天花板”现象?这是一项基于采用自我民族志和口述历史技术的后结构主义方法的定性研究。这些证据是通过对毕业于研究生课程的女性学者进行半结构化的深入访谈建立起来的。从解释主义的角度对该语料库进行了分析,结果表明,巴西会计学术界存在“玻璃天花板”现象,并表现为该领域特有的障碍。在关闭的过程中竖起了障碍,阻碍了黑人女性的道路,她们的目标是在著名的学术空间取得成功,无论她们的资格水平如何。通过这种方式,它们被概念化为“彩色玻璃天花板”,因为在一个种族主义是社会关系结构因素的国家,这些障碍变得可见和具体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Gender, Work & Organization is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal was established in 1994 and is published by John Wiley & Sons. It covers research on the role of gender on the workfloor. In addition to the regular issues, the journal publishes several special issues per year and has new section, Feminist Frontiers,dedicated to contemporary conversations and topics in feminism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信