Seismic performance and repairability assessment of resilient RAC frame structures employing UHSB in columns

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Weiheng Liu, Jianwei Zhang, Man Zhang, Lin Tang
{"title":"Seismic performance and repairability assessment of resilient RAC frame structures employing UHSB in columns","authors":"Weiheng Liu,&nbsp;Jianwei Zhang,&nbsp;Man Zhang,&nbsp;Lin Tang","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02126-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To investigate the influence of ultra-high strength steel bars (UHSB) on the seismic performance and repairability of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) frame structures, low cyclic loading tests were conducted on two frame structures. HRB600-grade steel bars were used as the longitudinal reinforcement in columns of HRB600-reinforced frame structure (HFS), while UHSB were employed as the longitudinal reinforcement in columns of UHSB-reinforced frame structure (UFS). The experimental results indicated that the damage evolution of specimens was similar. However, there was no plastic hinge forming at the column ends in the UFS. The plastic hinge at the column ends in the HFS led to a greater energy dissipation capacity compared to the UFS, particularly beyond 2.0% drift. At a horizontal drift of 1.0%, the HFS and UFS can be reused without any repair. However, at a horizontal drift of 2.5%, the HFS can be reused after repair. The residual drift of UFS was within 0.5%, indicating that UFS can be reused after simple repair. When the horizontal drift reached 3.5%, the HFS was difficult to repair, whereas the residual drift of the UFS was still less than 1.0% and able to repair. Additionally, finite element models, considering the bond-slip behavior between weakly bonded UHSB and RAC, were established by setting nonlinear springs. The influences of varying UHSB ratios and axial compression ratios of columns were analyzed. It is recommended to control both the UHSB ratio and the axial compression ratio in resilient RAC frame structures to mitigate the risk of progressive collapse.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 5","pages":"2017 - 2045"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02126-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the influence of ultra-high strength steel bars (UHSB) on the seismic performance and repairability of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) frame structures, low cyclic loading tests were conducted on two frame structures. HRB600-grade steel bars were used as the longitudinal reinforcement in columns of HRB600-reinforced frame structure (HFS), while UHSB were employed as the longitudinal reinforcement in columns of UHSB-reinforced frame structure (UFS). The experimental results indicated that the damage evolution of specimens was similar. However, there was no plastic hinge forming at the column ends in the UFS. The plastic hinge at the column ends in the HFS led to a greater energy dissipation capacity compared to the UFS, particularly beyond 2.0% drift. At a horizontal drift of 1.0%, the HFS and UFS can be reused without any repair. However, at a horizontal drift of 2.5%, the HFS can be reused after repair. The residual drift of UFS was within 0.5%, indicating that UFS can be reused after simple repair. When the horizontal drift reached 3.5%, the HFS was difficult to repair, whereas the residual drift of the UFS was still less than 1.0% and able to repair. Additionally, finite element models, considering the bond-slip behavior between weakly bonded UHSB and RAC, were established by setting nonlinear springs. The influences of varying UHSB ratios and axial compression ratios of columns were analyzed. It is recommended to control both the UHSB ratio and the axial compression ratio in resilient RAC frame structures to mitigate the risk of progressive collapse.

采用UHSB柱的弹性RAC框架结构抗震性能及可修性评估
为研究超高强度钢筋(UHSB)对再生骨料混凝土(RAC)框架结构抗震性能和可修复性的影响,对两个框架结构进行了低循环加载试验。hrb600加筋框架结构柱纵向钢筋采用hrb600级钢筋,UHSB加筋框架结构柱纵向钢筋采用UHSB级钢筋。试验结果表明,试件的损伤演化过程相似。然而,在UFS中,柱端没有塑性铰形成。与UFS相比,HFS中柱端塑性铰的耗能能力更大,特别是在2.0%漂移以上。在水平漂移1.0%时,HFS和UFS可以重复使用,无需任何修复。然而,在水平漂移2.5%时,修复后的HFS可以重复使用。UFS的残余漂移在0.5%以内,说明UFS经过简单修复后可以重复使用。当水平漂移达到3.5%时,HFS难以修复,而UFS的残余漂移仍小于1.0%,能够修复。此外,通过设置非线性弹簧,建立了考虑弱键合UHSB与RAC粘结滑移行为的有限元模型。分析了不同UHSB比和柱轴压比的影响。建议控制弹性RAC框架结构的UHSB比和轴压比,以减轻其逐渐倒塌的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信