Steric and Energetic Characterization of Advanced Glauconite Based Silicate Nanosheets and Nano-Rods as Deliveries of Cisplatin Chemotherapy: Loading, Release, and Anticancer Activities
Haifa E. Alfassam, Nourhan Nasser, Sarah I. Othman, Hanan M. Alharbi, Hassan A. Rudayni, Ahmed A. Allam, Mostafa R. Abukhadra
{"title":"Steric and Energetic Characterization of Advanced Glauconite Based Silicate Nanosheets and Nano-Rods as Deliveries of Cisplatin Chemotherapy: Loading, Release, and Anticancer Activities","authors":"Haifa E. Alfassam, Nourhan Nasser, Sarah I. Othman, Hanan M. Alharbi, Hassan A. Rudayni, Ahmed A. Allam, Mostafa R. Abukhadra","doi":"10.1007/s10876-025-02809-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Natural glauconite (GN) underwent facile exfoliation and scrolling modifications, resulting in two advanced structural derivatives with distinct morphologies: exfoliated glauconite nanosheets (Si-EXGN) and silicate nanorods (Si-GNRs). These derivatives exhibited enhanced physicochemical properties and were evaluated as both anticancer agents and delivery systems for cisplatin (CSPL). Compared to raw GN (119.3 mg/g), the modified derivatives exhibited significantly higher CSPL loading capacities: 309.4 mg/g for GNRs and 202.4 mg/g for EXGN. The loading behaviors were well-described by pseudo-first-order kinetics (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.94) and Langmuir isotherms (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.99). Advanced isotherm modeling highlighted the enriched interfaces of GNRs with a higher active site density (50.64 mg/g) compared to EXGN (38.4 mg/g) and GN (26.3 mg/g), allowing each GNR site to accommodate up to 7 CSPL molecules versus 5 for EXGN and 4 for GN. The loading process, governed by multimolecular physical interactions, was validated through loading energy values (<11 kJ/mol). The CSPL release profiles from EXGN and GNRs were continuous and prolonged, achieving 97.8% release after 200 hr and 100% release after 110 hr at physiological pH (7.4), respectively. Kinetic modeling revealed that the release process followed a non-Fickian transport mechanism, regulated primarily by diffusion and erosion. Specifically, release kinetics adhered to first-order (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.91–0.99), Hixson-Crowell (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.85–0.96), and Higuchi models (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.80–0.89). As standalone agents, EXGN (cell viability = 36.2%; IC50 = 230 µg/mL) and GNRs (cell viability = 22.4%; IC50 = 189.7 µg/mL) exhibited notable anticancer effects against human cervical cancer (HeLa) cells. Furthermore, when utilized as carriers for CSPL, their therapeutic efficacy was significantly enhanced. The CSPL-loaded EXGN system reduced cell viability to 2.3% (IC50 = 5.4 µg/mL), while the CSPL-loaded GNRs achieved superior cytotoxicity with a cell viability of 0.87% (IC50 = 1.6 µg/mL). The study underscores the potential of Si-EXGN and Si-GNRs as highly efficient drug delivery systems and anticancer agents. However, further in-depth in vivo evaluations are recommended to confirm the safety and biocompatibility of these materials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":618,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cluster Science","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cluster Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10876-025-02809-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Natural glauconite (GN) underwent facile exfoliation and scrolling modifications, resulting in two advanced structural derivatives with distinct morphologies: exfoliated glauconite nanosheets (Si-EXGN) and silicate nanorods (Si-GNRs). These derivatives exhibited enhanced physicochemical properties and were evaluated as both anticancer agents and delivery systems for cisplatin (CSPL). Compared to raw GN (119.3 mg/g), the modified derivatives exhibited significantly higher CSPL loading capacities: 309.4 mg/g for GNRs and 202.4 mg/g for EXGN. The loading behaviors were well-described by pseudo-first-order kinetics (R2 > 0.94) and Langmuir isotherms (R2 > 0.99). Advanced isotherm modeling highlighted the enriched interfaces of GNRs with a higher active site density (50.64 mg/g) compared to EXGN (38.4 mg/g) and GN (26.3 mg/g), allowing each GNR site to accommodate up to 7 CSPL molecules versus 5 for EXGN and 4 for GN. The loading process, governed by multimolecular physical interactions, was validated through loading energy values (<11 kJ/mol). The CSPL release profiles from EXGN and GNRs were continuous and prolonged, achieving 97.8% release after 200 hr and 100% release after 110 hr at physiological pH (7.4), respectively. Kinetic modeling revealed that the release process followed a non-Fickian transport mechanism, regulated primarily by diffusion and erosion. Specifically, release kinetics adhered to first-order (R2 > 0.91–0.99), Hixson-Crowell (R2 = 0.85–0.96), and Higuchi models (R2 = 0.80–0.89). As standalone agents, EXGN (cell viability = 36.2%; IC50 = 230 µg/mL) and GNRs (cell viability = 22.4%; IC50 = 189.7 µg/mL) exhibited notable anticancer effects against human cervical cancer (HeLa) cells. Furthermore, when utilized as carriers for CSPL, their therapeutic efficacy was significantly enhanced. The CSPL-loaded EXGN system reduced cell viability to 2.3% (IC50 = 5.4 µg/mL), while the CSPL-loaded GNRs achieved superior cytotoxicity with a cell viability of 0.87% (IC50 = 1.6 µg/mL). The study underscores the potential of Si-EXGN and Si-GNRs as highly efficient drug delivery systems and anticancer agents. However, further in-depth in vivo evaluations are recommended to confirm the safety and biocompatibility of these materials.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes the following types of papers: (a) original and important research;
(b) authoritative comprehensive reviews or short overviews of topics of current
interest; (c) brief but urgent communications on new significant research; and (d)
commentaries intended to foster the exchange of innovative or provocative ideas, and
to encourage dialogue, amongst researchers working in different cluster
disciplines.