Xuan Wang , Jingyu Li , Xueying Hu , Yueyuan Chen , Chunlu Li , Zhifang Cui
{"title":"A comparative life cycle assessment of novel technologies: Extraction of essential oils from rosemary leaves","authors":"Xuan Wang , Jingyu Li , Xueying Hu , Yueyuan Chen , Chunlu Li , Zhifang Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prior to industrial-scale implementation, a multidimensional evaluation of extraction efficiency, environmental impacts, and cost-effectiveness is critical for identifying optimal extraction techniques. This study systematically compared four rosemary essential oil extraction methods—deep eutectic solvent-assisted hydrodistillation (DES-HD), ultrasound-assisted hydrodistillation (UA-HD), cellulase-assisted hydrodistillation (CA-HD), and conventional hydrodistillation (HD)—by integrating yield analysis, life cycle assessment (LCA), and economic feasibility. DES-HD achieved the highest yield (0.78 %), then followed by UA-HD, CA-HD and HD. The antioxidant activity of DES-HD essential oil was 1.5 times that of HD, and it was attributed to its elevated total monoterpene/oxygenated monoterpene content (91.37 % for DES-HD vs. 81.40 % for HD), which also enhanced its antimicrobial performance. However, LCA revealed DES-HD as the least sustainable option due to energy-intensive DES synthesis and significant toxicity impacts, challenging its designation as a “green solvent.” To offset its ecological footprint, DES-HD would require a yield exceeding 1.78× that of UA-HD. In contrast, UA-HD emerged as the most sustainable and economically viable method, with the lowest standardized environmental impact and industrial energy consumption (2.07 kWh/kg), minimal selling price ($17.51/kg), and shortest payback period (4.46 years). Sensitivity analysis identified electricity consumption and solvent production were the dominant factors causing environmental burden, which can be mitigated by improving energy efficiency and solvent recovery, reducing extraction time, and attempting low-carbon transition of electricity generation mix. These findings highlight UA-HD as the optimal technique for rosemary essential oil production, while cautioning against the uncritical adoption of “green” solvents without holistic environmental and economic validation. The study provides a framework for advancing sustainable essential oil extraction by aligning solvent selection with rigorous multidisciplinary evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"56 ","pages":"Pages 328-342"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925000806","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prior to industrial-scale implementation, a multidimensional evaluation of extraction efficiency, environmental impacts, and cost-effectiveness is critical for identifying optimal extraction techniques. This study systematically compared four rosemary essential oil extraction methods—deep eutectic solvent-assisted hydrodistillation (DES-HD), ultrasound-assisted hydrodistillation (UA-HD), cellulase-assisted hydrodistillation (CA-HD), and conventional hydrodistillation (HD)—by integrating yield analysis, life cycle assessment (LCA), and economic feasibility. DES-HD achieved the highest yield (0.78 %), then followed by UA-HD, CA-HD and HD. The antioxidant activity of DES-HD essential oil was 1.5 times that of HD, and it was attributed to its elevated total monoterpene/oxygenated monoterpene content (91.37 % for DES-HD vs. 81.40 % for HD), which also enhanced its antimicrobial performance. However, LCA revealed DES-HD as the least sustainable option due to energy-intensive DES synthesis and significant toxicity impacts, challenging its designation as a “green solvent.” To offset its ecological footprint, DES-HD would require a yield exceeding 1.78× that of UA-HD. In contrast, UA-HD emerged as the most sustainable and economically viable method, with the lowest standardized environmental impact and industrial energy consumption (2.07 kWh/kg), minimal selling price ($17.51/kg), and shortest payback period (4.46 years). Sensitivity analysis identified electricity consumption and solvent production were the dominant factors causing environmental burden, which can be mitigated by improving energy efficiency and solvent recovery, reducing extraction time, and attempting low-carbon transition of electricity generation mix. These findings highlight UA-HD as the optimal technique for rosemary essential oil production, while cautioning against the uncritical adoption of “green” solvents without holistic environmental and economic validation. The study provides a framework for advancing sustainable essential oil extraction by aligning solvent selection with rigorous multidisciplinary evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.