Numerical investigation of the influence of coastal structure removal on sand spit morphology

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, OCEAN
Shanhang Chi , Chi Zhang , Weiqiu Chen , Yuan Li , Ping Wang , Dongfang Liang , Jinhai Zheng
{"title":"Numerical investigation of the influence of coastal structure removal on sand spit morphology","authors":"Shanhang Chi ,&nbsp;Chi Zhang ,&nbsp;Weiqiu Chen ,&nbsp;Yuan Li ,&nbsp;Ping Wang ,&nbsp;Dongfang Liang ,&nbsp;Jinhai Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.apor.2025.104560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The application of hard engineering solutions in coastal protection has been controversial because of their potential environmental impacts. Selective removal of intrusive coastal structures offers an alternative to address the coastal erosion problem. The key idea is to remove the erosion-causing structures on highly artificial coasts, triggering the natural recovery of eroded shorelines. However, the effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of this approach in real coastal environments remain poorly understood. This study investigates the influence of coastal structure removal on coastal evolution using a computationally efficient coastline model ShorelineS. The analysis focuses on the sand spit at the Fudu Estuary in Liaoning Province, China, which is a stretch of morphologically complex coast suffering from erosion due to intense coastal engineering. An estuary jetty, an attached breakwater, an artificial island, and cofferdams were constructed along the 2 km coast between 2010 and 2015. Validated by annual satellite-derived shorelines and hourly hindcast wave data, the model can well reproduce the morphological change of the sand spit both in the natural state and under the influence of man-made structures. Post-removal shoreline evolutions are quantitatively analyzed in nine coastal structure removal scenarios, so that the optimal removal scheme and the shoreline recovery mechanisms can be identified. The results demonstrate that rational removal of coastal structures can reverse shoreline erosion and landform degradation by changing nearshore wave conditions, regulating sediment transport paths, and increasing sediment inputs. The present study suggests that the general principle of removing coastal structures to enhance coastal resilience in a broader coastal setting is to restore the balance between sediment loss and input, basing on understanding of sediment transport mechanisms and impacts of structures on coastal morphology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8261,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ocean Research","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 104560"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ocean Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141118725001476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of hard engineering solutions in coastal protection has been controversial because of their potential environmental impacts. Selective removal of intrusive coastal structures offers an alternative to address the coastal erosion problem. The key idea is to remove the erosion-causing structures on highly artificial coasts, triggering the natural recovery of eroded shorelines. However, the effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of this approach in real coastal environments remain poorly understood. This study investigates the influence of coastal structure removal on coastal evolution using a computationally efficient coastline model ShorelineS. The analysis focuses on the sand spit at the Fudu Estuary in Liaoning Province, China, which is a stretch of morphologically complex coast suffering from erosion due to intense coastal engineering. An estuary jetty, an attached breakwater, an artificial island, and cofferdams were constructed along the 2 km coast between 2010 and 2015. Validated by annual satellite-derived shorelines and hourly hindcast wave data, the model can well reproduce the morphological change of the sand spit both in the natural state and under the influence of man-made structures. Post-removal shoreline evolutions are quantitatively analyzed in nine coastal structure removal scenarios, so that the optimal removal scheme and the shoreline recovery mechanisms can be identified. The results demonstrate that rational removal of coastal structures can reverse shoreline erosion and landform degradation by changing nearshore wave conditions, regulating sediment transport paths, and increasing sediment inputs. The present study suggests that the general principle of removing coastal structures to enhance coastal resilience in a broader coastal setting is to restore the balance between sediment loss and input, basing on understanding of sediment transport mechanisms and impacts of structures on coastal morphology.
海岸结构拆除对沙粒形态影响的数值研究
在海岸保护中采用硬性工程解决方案一直存在争议,因为它们可能对环境造成影 响。有选择地拆除侵蚀性海岸结构为解决海岸侵蚀问题提供了另一种选择。其主要思路是在高度人工化的海岸上拆除造成侵蚀的建筑 物,促使被侵蚀海岸线的自然恢复。然而,人们对这种方法在实际海岸环境中的效果和内在机理仍然知之甚少。本研究利用计算效率高的海岸线模型 ShorelineS,研究了海岸结构移除对海岸演化的影响。分析的重点是中国辽宁省于都河口的沙嘴,这是一片形态复杂的海岸,由于海岸工程的实施而遭受侵蚀。2010 年至 2015 年期间,在 2 公里长的海岸线上修建了河口防波堤、附属防波堤、人工岛和围堰。通过年度卫星海岸线和每小时波浪后报数据的验证,该模型可以很好地再现沙嘴在自然状态和人工结构影响下的形态变化。定量分析了 9 种海岸建筑物拆除后的海岸线演变,从而确定了最佳拆除方案和海岸线恢复机制。研究结果表明,合理地拆除海岸构筑物,可以通过改变近岸波浪条件、调节泥沙输移路径和增加泥沙输入,扭转海岸线侵蚀和地貌退化的趋势。本研究表明,在更广泛的沿岸环境中,移除海岸建筑物以提高海岸韧性的一般原则是, 在了解沉积物输运机制和建筑物对海岸形态影响的基础上,恢复沉积物流失和输入之间的平 衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Ocean Research
Applied Ocean Research 地学-工程:大洋
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
7.00%
发文量
316
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Applied Ocean Research is to encourage the submission of papers that advance the state of knowledge in a range of topics relevant to ocean engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信